Anyone else watching the Kyle Rittenhouse trial?

hanimmal

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
im not being racist. the dude screaming the n word was WHITE. If its racist, then your dead pedo hero Rosenbaum is a racist too i guess. im only quoting the dead criminal man.
Click to expand...
Now you are projecting.

BodegaBud said:
Picking a fight would show intent and entrapment. You guys are making it personal and nobody should be looking at anything but the facts
Click to expand...
You seem so into this trial for some reason, but you didn't see all the videos of them telling these buddies of the domestic terrorists who shot up and set fire to the police department to get out of their city?

How is that not picking a fight?

BodegaBud said:
He couldn’t turn himself in at the police station in Kenosha because it was fenced off due to unrest. It can also be argued it would be unsafe to do so. I would definitely drive to a different town and turn myself in far away the angry mob. The fact is he did in fact turn himself in.
Click to expand...
Yeah because there were not all types of cops there that he could have gotten down on his knees and put his gun down to be taken in.

You are reaching man.

But I guess that is the point of this thread right?
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
He couldn’t turn himself in at the police station in Kenosha because it was fenced off due to unrest. It can also be argued it would be unsafe to do so. I would definitely drive to a different town and turn myself in far away the angry mob. The fact is he did in fact turn himself in.
Click to expand...
he ran home and went to bed actually
 
madvillian420

madvillian420

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
blah blah blah

And the same assholes defending Rittenhouse never let up, just like they did over Chauvin, even after the unanimous jury verdict they bellowed:

"Floyd was already forcibly resisting his arrest by Kueng and Lane when Chauvin arrived on the scene with officer Tou Thao, his Asian-American partner — then an eleven-year MPD veteran, who is fluent in Hmong (a language spoken in parts of China, Vietnam, Laos, and Thailand). Before Chauvin ever intervened, Floyd was already complaining that he could not breathe — at a time when his breathing was obviously not being impeded by police.

According to the prosecution’s evidence, which the jury must be presumed to have credited, Floyd died because his lungs were constricted. To be very specific, Floyd was never placed in a choke hold. That Chauvin did not choke him is not merely a defense contention. It is the prosecution’s evidence. Floyd’s airway was never constricted by the placement of police hands or knees on his throat."

www.nationalreview.com

What the Media Didn’t Tell You about the Chauvin Case | National Review

George Floyd should not have died, but the case does not stand as a totem of systemic racism. Here are the facts.
www.nationalreview.com www.nationalreview.com

You guys never stop lying. Your lying only works on people already convinced by previous lies but like a sea lion, you walk up to people and bellow, expecting them to give you something nice.
Click to expand...
Chauvin should get the death penalty. fuck that dude. different case, different circumstances.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
fleeing the state? i thought he "didnt live there and wasnt supposed to be there"????Isnt that the narrative? kid travels across state lines to play cops and pedos?
Click to expand...
He fled the state after he killed three people, one of whom he shot in the back. This is a fact. He killed a man in Wisconsin and was arrested in Illinois after he had been put on a list of fugitives of justice.

www.independent.co.uk

17-year-old arrested for murder and fleeing state after Kenosha shootings that left two dead

Kyle Rittenhouse of Antioch, Illinois, faces charges of first-degree intentional homicide
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk

What is not certain is why would an innocent person do that? The police were right there. He walked right past them just minutes after his last victim was shot. He even said something to them. All he needed to do was tell them what happened and let them do their jobs. Maybe he wouldn't be on trial if he had done that, maybe he would . At least he wouldn't have been extradited and dragged to justices as a fugitive. That makes him look guilty, don't you agree?
 
BodegaBud

BodegaBud

Well-Known Member
hanimmal said:
You seem so into this trial for some reason, but you didn't see all the videos of them telling these buddies of the domestic terrorists who shot up and set fire to the police department to get out of their city?

How is that not picking a fight?
Click to expand...
This trial is extremely interesting because it’s not only a hot topic but also will set a precedent and set an example for many laws on the books.
What are you talking about burning police stations???? That never happened in Kenosha
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
madvillian420 said:
Chauvin should get the death penalty. fuck that dude. different case, different circumstances.
Click to expand...
Just pointing out that the same arguments used by right wing radicals to defend Chauvin are showing up in your posts. Compare that with @schuylaar 's perceptive note that it seems fishy -- if Rittenhouse were as innocent as he said he was, why would he flee the scene and escape across the state border to avoid arrest.

Did you know that he later lied about what happened? He said the first guy he shot -- hit him with a baseball bat. Records show that never happened. If he's as innocent as you and he say, why did he lie about what happened?
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
He couldn’t turn himself in at the police station in Kenosha because it was fenced off due to unrest. It can also be argued it would be unsafe to do so. I would definitely drive to a different town and turn myself in far away the angry mob. The fact is he did in fact turn himself in.
Click to expand...
^^disrespect. There is video of him walking right past police officers You guys lie even when it's easy to show that you lied.

www.nytimes.com

Tracking the Suspect in the Fatal Kenosha Shootings (Published 2020)

Footage appears to show a teenager shooting three people during protests in Wisconsin. We tracked his movements that night.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

Police response
As this happens, police vehicles just one block away remain stationary during the gunfire.

Mr. Rittenhouse walks with his hands up toward the police vehicles. Bystanders call out to the officers that he had just shot people.

The police drive by him without stopping, on their way to assist the victims.

They were right there at the scene. Laughing at your obvious attempt at a lie. It is a fact that Rittenhouse fled across state border and was arrested the next day in Illinois as a fugitive from justice.
 
BodegaBud

BodegaBud

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Just pointing out that the same arguments used by right wing radicals to defend Chauvin are showing up in your posts. Compare that with @schuylaar 's perceptive note that it seems fishy -- if Rittenhouse were as innocent as he said he was, why would he flee the scene and escape across the state border to avoid arrest.

Did you know that he later lied about what happened? He said the first guy he shot -- hit him with a baseball bat. Records show that never happened. If he's as innocent as you and he say, why did he lie about what happened?
Click to expand...


Lying does not prove guilt nor does bad judgement. I can see where it would hurt his testimony if it was strictly he said/she said but with all the video footage and documentation by cinematographers and private citizens it’s clear the dude was attacked. All the people testifying also confirmed this even though you can tell they didn’t want to be involved. The only people contradicting are the guys that own the dealership and it’s obviously done to avoid a lawsuit. It will be interesting regardless of outcome.
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
Lying does not prove guilt nor does bad judgement. I can see where it would hurt his testimony if it was strictly he said/she said but with all the video footage and documentation by cinematographers and private citizens it’s clear the dude was attacked. All the people testifying also confirmed this even though you can tell they didn’t want to be involved. The only people contradicting are the guys that own the dealership and it’s obviously done to avoid a lawsuit. It will be interesting regardless of outcome.
Click to expand...
Give it up you guys have no morals or issues lying
 
M

mooray

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
Lying does not prove guilt nor does bad judgement. I can see where it would hurt his testimony if it was strictly he said/she said but with all the video footage and documentation by cinematographers and private citizens it’s clear the dude was attacked. All the people testifying also confirmed this even though you can tell they didn’t want to be involved. The only people contradicting are the guys that own the dealership and it’s obviously done to avoid a lawsuit. It will be interesting regardless of outcome.
Click to expand...
Evidence is cumulative. Lying isn't everything, but it's certainly not nothing, as you're trying to convey.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
Lying does not prove guilt nor does bad judgement. I can see where it would hurt his testimony if it was strictly he said/she said but with all the video footage and documentation by cinematographers and private citizens it’s clear the dude was attacked. All the people testifying also confirmed this even though you can tell they didn’t want to be involved. The only people contradicting are the guys that own the dealership and it’s obviously done to avoid a lawsuit. It will be interesting regardless of outcome.
Click to expand...
Just saying, at the time of the crime, he acted like he was guilty. This is an objective and verifiable fact. He fled the scene and got across the state border. This is an objective and verifiable fact. He was a fugitive from justice when he was arrested. This is an objective and verifiable fact.

All the crap about video showing this or that. What you say is an opinion. Given the lies you've been caught at, you pretty much killed your credibility. Other than being a known liar, you are repeating all the same crap we heard during the Chauvin trial. All of it. And in the end, Chauvin was given a unanimous guilty verdict. Guilty on all charges. That didn't stop the lying naysayers. So your opinion is just more crap. But you are free to form whatever opinion you like.

So, pardon me if I unfairly labelled you as a lying right wing menace to our society. In my defense, you sound like one and this post carries no legal weight. It's just my opinion.
 
BodegaBud

BodegaBud

Well-Known Member
mooray said:
Evidence is cumulative. Lying isn't everything, but it's certainly not nothing, as you're trying to convey.
Click to expand...

Again if it was solely based on his testimony it might hurt him but with all of the witnesses and footage available it’s pretty easy to see what happened. You try and jump anyone they are likely going to defend themselves. One thing never brought up is why did the others get involved after he shot Rosenbaum? He was running towards the police. The crowd had no idea the police would just drive by. Why engage? Why not follow and point him out? I think the only reason the cops didn’t engage because of all the shooting which wouldn’t of happened in the second incident had they followed from a distance. Again just what I observed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top