Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
As a breeder you should care the most
To stay on track though I just wanted to play devil's advocate. Felt bad for the dude who removed his avatar.
I'm too stoned for this
Last edited:
FlushingVsNotFlushing & Chlorophyll Breakdown (Help a fellow Newbie/wanabie Gromie)
- Thread starter The Florist
- Start date
To stay on track though I just wanted to play devil's advocate. Felt bad for the dude who removed his avatar.
I'm too stoned for this
Precisely there are a ton of stupid people that can be swindled away from their hard earned money because of advertising. Just because something is popular doesn't mean it is good.
Science is about proving a hypothesis. Science isn't sold it's funded. Anyway you do you.
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
I appreciate that. There is no swindling though because the quality is there.
I am curious if there is an science experiment out there that tests the flowers under combustion; and measures / compares the rate of combustion rather than fertilizer content in dead plant tissue
Prove it, objectively.
So are you saying that there's some accelerant in some cannabis and not others? I'm f'n howling here.
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
How about instead, you prove the opposite objectively? I know and can tell by your posts that you have been growing for a long time. So you can tell me about the side by side comparisons? It is kind of funny when people say it... Almost a denial of sorts... When they have truly ran it.
"Statistical analysis determined that personal preferences did not influence taste test outcomes (data not shown). "
That bit is pretty funny there also. From your paper on the nutrient company.
What I am suggesting is that maybe you're wrong about quality in relation to the 'feeding to the end' zombie apocalypses.
This is the good things about science is that it can always be proven wrong/ right
Nope burden of proof is on you. How about you do it and stop trolling
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
Well I am. This is my job.
I'll make sure to link you when I make enough money to pay a scientist to prove the facts
Last edited:
Singlemalt
Well-Known Member
Why would anyone care about rates of combustion? Tell me please what possible conclusions you could draw from that exercise?
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
I mean.. People be lighting the weed on fire to smoke it...
"The combustion of tobacco results in the formation of smoke (that contains a range of chemical constituents), heat, and ash. The high heat associated with combustion leads to the thermal breakdown of the tobacco when it is burned, resulting in the production of many of the toxicants found in cigarette smoke."
I guess what I meant to say was about the smoke not dead plant tissue
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
Umm question.....how stoned at you from a scale from 1 to 10?.........jc
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Keep it moist.... it burns slow, dry it out... it burns fast. What more do you want to know?
Singlemalt
Well-Known Member
Ok and you would relate variances in combustion to mineral content?
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
No I would be curious to find out if they appear in different forms under combustion// free radicals causing flavor changes or curing changes. I suppose 'rate of' was dumb... Don't care about the speed of the bun - My bad
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Do you enjoy smoking weed?
Alter Jean
Well-Known Member
Singlemalt
Well-Known Member
So you are interested in organic combustion products? Not just the CO, CO2,various nitrogenous compounds?
Hollatchaboy
Well-Known Member
Then why question it?Only if it's denk
BudmanTX
Well-Known Member
What in the hell is 187 weed......bet it smoke like trash......