I'm voting for McCain....

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
I don't think any of the usual characters who are always shouting about the "liberal media" ever addressed any of posts about the "liberal media'" wonder why? They never stop complaining about it any other time.
Good point. They can't refute it because it is simply not true. I put a lot of time into those posts, gave folks the quotes from their superheroes, and yet I got silence.

Oh well. Silence is at least more civilized than the mental breakdown we have seen on this thread and on the other one :roll:
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
o and ps
Nader took plenty of votes from Kerry in 2000
thats pretty much why we got Bush
That and a few other factors but pretty much third partys caused the election swing
...take away? why couldn't these people smiply wanted nader as potus?
could I say that every repuke vote, takes away a demorat vote?

Forget all that noise about swing votes....
check into who can best run this country, today.
I personaly feel we need someone A: need miliarty Experience, so he's not a puppet:ergo george bush. potus title is commander-in-chief.
the commander of a nation's military forces.
B: Somekind of a economic back ground, otherwise potus is just a puppet:ergo george bush.
c: lowering the deficit:both parties have left this subject out with reason.

Importent issues and somehow this country ends up with two men
who lack the skills needed. that's being pretty honest.

Your dam right my vote is anti republican and democrat, both hands are dirty, right and left. enough is enough is enough...
 

joepro

Well-Known Member
Good point. They can't refute it because it is simply not true. I put a lot of time into those posts, gave folks the quotes from their superheroes, and yet I got silence.

Oh well. Silence is at least more civilized than the mental breakdown we have seen on this thread and on the other one :roll:
odd how nobody replys to you.:lol:;-)
so sad.
tip: don't come off as a blind asshole with internet muscles.
Thanks for the -rep :finger:..making friends huh?
DORK!:lol:
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Good point. They can't refute it because it is simply not true. I put a lot of time into those posts, gave folks the quotes from their superheroes, and yet I got silence.

Oh well. Silence is at least more civilized than the mental breakdown we have seen on this thread and on the other one :roll:
Personally, I don't really care which way the media is slanted, because both sides are slanted the same way, towards BIG government.

Though, Leilani, did you hear Obama's little Nazi-esque State Police Rant? How any one can vote for him after that kind of idiotic comment is beyond me. I can't vote for some one that is arguing that we need to establish a State Police or a State Security Force.

There was this mad man who did that back in the thirties, and from what I understand it didn't work out too well for Germany.

Then again, I think you were showing us that you would be the perfect candidate for that kind of position with one of your posts that contained some comment along the lines of ,"On your way," or whatever it was that you said.

I think that democrats are blind to the flaws of their demagogue and are too busy attacking McCain to realize that there are more flaws in their president-elect than there are in McCain. Which is really damn amazing in away...

No, given a choice between Obama and McCain there is no ands ifs or buts about the way any one with any understanding of history will vote.

And what's this about your ranting to people not responding to your posts. I responded, and you never replied.
 

undertheice

Well-Known Member
I think that democrats are blind to the flaws of their demagogue and are too busy attacking McCain to realize that there are more flaws in their president-elect than there are in McCain. Which is really damn amazing in a way...
the hatred flies from both sides and neither seems to cared how flawed their own position is. obama's pie in the sky deceptions combined with his obvious disgust aimed at those who don't cater to the whims of the jealous masses and mccain's embrace of an american way that he has no intention of supporting, both are just playing to the ignorant crowd. when times seem bad the political animals promise change, when times are good they invent threats to spread the fear that keeps us under their thumb.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
the hatred flies from both sides and neither seems to cared how flawed their own position is. obama's pie in the sky deceptions combined with his obvious disgust aimed at those who don't cater to the whims of the jealous masses and mccain's embrace of an american way that he has no intention of supporting, both are just playing to the ignorant crowd. when times seem bad the political animals promise change, when times are good they invent threats to spread the fear that keeps us under their thumb.
Would that people learn to go forward with both eyes wide open, instead of half shut.
 

PoliticalHippy

Active Member
There was this mad man who did that back in the thirties, and from what I understand it didn't work out too well for Germany.
Obama hasnt been pointing fingers tho unlike a certain somone we all know.

i dont think hes suddenly going to be like " GET WHITEY HE DID THIS TO US"
even if we all know its rich white males that run everything, both infront and behind the screen

Forget all that noise about swing votes....
sorry but when you hear a sound that might cause problems in your car you dont say to yourself to forget the noise do you
 

PoliticalHippy

Active Member
...take away? why couldn't these people smiply wanted nader as potus?
could I say that every repuke vote, takes away a demorat vote?
of course they wanted nader thats why they voted, but its a popularity contest in the end.

voting for third partys is like nominating the kid with a pizza face as prom king
hes just not going to get the votes, and he takes eyes off the real question of who is going to be running the show.

Nader voters caused bush

what a shitty beer
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
Personally, I don't really care which way the media is slanted, because both sides are slanted the same way, towards BIG government.

Though, Leilani, did you hear Obama's little Nazi-esque State Police Rant? How any one can vote for him after that kind of idiotic comment is beyond me. I can't vote for some one that is arguing that we need to establish a State Police or a State Security Force.

There was this mad man who did that back in the thirties, and from what I understand it didn't work out too well for Germany.

Then again, I think you were showing us that you would be the perfect candidate for that kind of position with one of your posts that contained some comment along the lines of ,"On your way," or whatever it was that you said.

I think that democrats are blind to the flaws of their demagogue and are too busy attacking McCain to realize that there are more flaws in their president-elect than there are in McCain. Which is really damn amazing in away...

No, given a choice between Obama and McCain there is no ands ifs or buts about the way any one with any understanding of history will vote.

And what's this about your ranting to people not responding to your posts. I responded, and you never replied.
Brutal, no, I've missed whatever this police state thing is that you are talkinga bout. I googled it, but all I found was the stuff about the Obama camp talking about so-called truth squads, with regard to untrue things being aired about political candidates. And honestly, if we can insist on truth in advertising for consumer products and services, then I think we can hold that same standard for political advertising.

If there is something that I am missing, feel free to point it out.

Have I read you correctly here? You are comparing me to Hitler? Wow.

Re my "ranting" about people not responding to my posts. I'm talking about a certain person here, who stated on the Karl Rove thread that Obama's campaign was taking illegal donations from gift cards. I asked for some back up on that claim, because it's kind of a biggie. When that person did so, I found a lot of flaws in the assertion, and for that, at first, I got silence, despite being ridiculed as a dunce in this person's post, and then, when i asked again: hey, you gave me a bunch of flawed links, failed to read the entire article, posted the same articles under different links, etc, then I was really insulted. So? That's what that is all about. Maybe you can figure that out yourself?

So. I'm just like Hitler now, huh? Well, that's one hell of a statement. Explain if you dare.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Brutal, no, I've missed whatever this police state thing is that you are talkinga bout. I googled it, but all I found was the stuff about the Obama camp talking about so-called truth squads, with regard to untrue things being aired about political candidates. And honestly, if we can insist on truth in advertising for consumer products and services, then I think we can hold that same standard for political advertising.

If there is something that I am missing, feel free to point it out.

Have I read you correctly here? You are comparing me to Hitler? Wow.

Re my "ranting" about people not responding to my posts. I'm talking about a certain person here, who stated on the Karl Rove thread that Obama's campaign was taking illegal donations from gift cards. I asked for some back up on that claim, because it's kind of a biggie. When that person did so, I found a lot of flaws in the assertion, and for that, at first, I got silence, despite being ridiculed as a dunce in this person's post, and then, when i asked again: hey, you gave me a bunch of flawed links, failed to read the entire article, posted the same articles under different links, etc, then I was really insulted. So? That's what that is all about. Maybe you can figure that out yourself?

So. I'm just like Hitler now, huh? Well, that's one hell of a statement. Explain if you dare.
No, I'm not comparing you to Hitler, I'm comparing Obama's calling for a Civilian National Security Force of equal size to the military to Hitler.
 

Leilani Garden

Well-Known Member
Okay, Brutal, I'll check that out, but would you please explain this comment to me? This is from your post up there directed at me, specifically:

Then again, I think you were showing us that you would be the perfect candidate for that kind of position with one of your posts that contained some comment along the lines of ,"On your way," or whatever it was that you said.



So, is there something I am missing or is this a typo, or what? This sure does read as though you are saying I'm the perfect candidate for a Hitleresque position, based on some post I made. If I'm wrong, please explain. Thanks.
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Okay, Brutal, I'll check that out, but would you please explain this comment to me? This is from your post up there directed at me, specifically:

Then again, I think you were showing us that you would be the perfect candidate for that kind of position with one of your posts that contained some comment along the lines of ,"On your way," or whatever it was that you said.



So, is there something I am missing or is this a typo, or what? This sure does read as though you are saying I'm the perfect candidate for a Hitleresque position, based on some post I made. If I'm wrong, please explain. Thanks.
Perfect candidate for his Civilian National Security Force.
 

PoliticalHippy

Active Member
So, is there something I am missing or is this a typo, or what? This sure does read as though you are saying I'm the perfect candidate for a Hitleresque position, based on some post I made. If I'm wrong, please explain. Thanks.
somehow i just dont see you as an evil jew blaming genocidal maniac

but thats just me
 
Top