WaPo, CNN Virtually Silent After NYT Reveals 2nd FBI Spy Sent To Infiltrate Trump Campaign

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
So you think that's even germane to the discussion of the accusation that a legally authorized FBI investigation based upon evidence was an illegal act? OK, have a nice day.
Nope, but that was the discussion I was having that you replied to. Now picture an emoji of me sending you love.
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Nope, but that was the discussion I was having that you replied to. Now picture an emoji of me sending you love.
You may argue the minutia to an uninterested lay-public but the fact remains the FBI was authorized in a legal manner by a judge to conduct the investigation that Trumpkins are so upset about. Because they have no good reason to object, they make up shit to deflect.

Imagine me sending you an emoji that indicates you have no leg to stand on.
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
You may argue the minutia to an uninterested lay-public but the fact remains the FBI was authorized in a legal manner by a judge to conduct the investigation that Trumpkins are so upset about. Because they have no good reason to object, they make up shit to deflect.

Imagine me sending you an emoji that indicates you have no leg to stand on.
Perhaps you are correct! Time will tell if the FISA court agrees with you, my sources say they do not.
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
It was a legal authorization to conduct an FBI investigation. This is settled.
Yes, it was authorized and now those applications are being reviewed to see if they met the legal standard. I say they did not and will be proven right or wrong when investigation is concluded. Enough word games for today,
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Yes, it was authorized and now those applications are being reviewed to see if they met the legal standard. I say they did not and will be proven right or wrong when investigation is concluded. Enough word games for today,
You’ve already been proven wrong on your whole “no collusion!!!!” Spamfest


What does it hurt you now to be wrong about one more thing?
 

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Yes, it was authorized and now those applications are being reviewed to see if they met the legal standard. I say they did not and will be proven right or wrong when investigation is concluded. Enough word games for today,
It was already investigated and the finding was that the process and authorizations were all legal.

I'm sorry that it hurtz your Nazi's feelings that facts and following legal procedures are important when making decisions about conducting FBI investigations but that's the way it goes in the US.
 

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
Yes, it was authorized and now those applications are being reviewed to see if they met the legal standard. I say they did not and will be proven right or wrong when investigation is concluded. Enough word games for today,
This orange embarrassment violates laws daily and you are concerned if his investigation "oranges" are valid ?
Who cares, why are you his Roy Cohn ?
 

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
It was already investigated and the finding was that the process and authorizations were all legal.

I'm sorry that it hurtz your Nazi's feelings that facts and following legal procedures are important when making decisions about conducting FBI investigations but that's the way it goes in the US.
Tell that to Horowitz.
 
Last edited:

Bugeye

Well-Known Member
This orange embarrassment violates laws daily and you are concerned if his investigation "oranges" are valid ?
Who cares, why are you his Roy Cohn ?
What one party can do, both can do. I’m actually looking out for you. No thanks needed.
 
Top