Kamala Harris will announce her bid for 2020 on Jan 21

Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
ttystikk said:
They were lifelong Democrats who were shocked to discover they're been purged from the rolls just in time to be unable to vote in the 2016 primary.

You have no grasp of the facts because you run your mouth instead of actually digging for the truth.

You're the worst kind of false intellectual; just like flat earthers, you decide your conclusions ahead of time and then only look for evidence that supports them. All else is discarded.

The stench of intellectual dishonesty oozes from nearly every one of your posts.
Click to expand...
What is the election official supposed to do on election day when a voter isn't on the roll? According to their rolls, the person isn't a Democrat. Yes, you are right, people were purged from the rolls without their knowledge and that's not right. In fact it was illegal. It's also a fact that New York is plagued with elections issues just like Florida is. I don't know why the people of that state don't demand this shit be stopped. Maybe the settlement arrived at last year and signed off on this year will begin this process.

There has been no official explanation of what happened other than the admission of guilt that 200,000 voters in New York were illegally purged from the rolls. So, neither you nor I can really know what happened. But I'll go with you on this. As you and others say, skullduggery took place in three districts in New York that skewed those districts to Clinton. Those districts were Brooklyn, Queens and Manhattan. Is it your claim that those three districts is why Sanders lost the Democratic Primary?

Some simple arithmetic will prove you wrong if that's what you are saying. Sanders' campaign was the walking dead before the New York primary even took place.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:

I don't disagree with Harris based on policy. I disagree with Harris based on trust.

I don't trust you to be honest because you're not
Click to expand...
Just yesterday you said you disagreed with her on policy. So, thanks for admitting you simply didn't know what you were talking about.

I'm not going argue with your opinion if you base it upon a subjective gut feeling. I'm simply saying that we should not be slinging about falsehoods as if they were facts.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Remember, guys.. He says he doesn't have a dog in the fight..
Click to expand...
Padawanbater2 said:
I can't imagine being so defensive of someone I didn't support..
Click to expand...
The only dog I have in this fight is accuracy. Challenge what I said based upon the facts.

Sanders supporters have so few facts to cling to that they just make shit up, not different from Trumpkins.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
The only dog I have in this fight is accuracy. Challenge what I said based upon the facts.

Sanders supporters have so few facts to cling to that they just make shit up, not different from Trumpkins.
Click to expand...
So by your own definition you're a proud Trumpkin.

Look, you just made up some facts right here.
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
The only dog I have in this fight is accuracy. Challenge what I said based upon the facts.

Sanders supporters have so few facts to cling to that they just make shit up, not different from Trumpkins.
Click to expand...
ttystikk said:
So by your own definition you're a proud Trumpkin.

Look, you just made up some facts right here.
Click to expand...
The jab I made calling you a Trumpkin cut deep.

Thought so.

Thanks for the confirmation that it did.
 
ttystikk

ttystikk

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
naked capitalism is a propaganda site that supports the right wing agenda. Anything that comes from them is suspect.
Click to expand...
You're a know nothing loudmouth who wouldn't know real journalism if you were forced to confront it.

And your cheap attempts at propaganda are laughable.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
I've said all along, I'm going to make up my mind after the debates are over. Other than Sanders. I'd only vote for him in the general if he won the Democratic primary.

You said you disagree with Harris because of her policies and haven't said what policies you disagree with.
Click to expand...
Harris says she's progressive. She vocally supports a progressive agenda.

The problem I have with her is that I don't believe what she says. I think she says she supports a progressive agenda because it's politically beneficial for her. Knowing she is running for president in 2020 kind of confirms that. I think she's lying to garner progressive support. The reason I think she's lying is because her voting record in congress does not reflect a progressive. It reflects someone vying for power. Playing the political game.
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
Harris says she's progressive. She vocally supports a progressive agenda.

The problem I have with her is that I don't believe what she says. I think she says she supports a progressive agenda because it's politically beneficial for her. Knowing she is running for president in 2020 kind of confirms that. I think she's lying to garner progressive support. The reason I think she's lying is because her voting record in congress does not reflect a progressive. It reflects someone vying for power. Playing the political game.
Click to expand...
Why did Bernie vote for the war he was against ?
Why did Bernie vote for " bring them to heal " ?
Why did Bernie vote AGAINST the Brady Bill ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top