How do these Social based countries keep doing it?

Anyone notice the fuckers that talk the most about freedoms and guns never served? They just run their fucking mouths. If gunplay breaks out they're the first to run or go down. Like the fat worm Rob Roy. A misappropriation of a name if ever there was one. Smack talking sissies.
 
hotrodharley said:
Anyone notice the fuckers that talk the most about freedoms and guns never served? They just run their fucking mouths. If gunplay breaks out they're the first to run or go down. Like the fat worm Rob Roy. A misappropriation of a name if ever there was one. Smack talking sissies.
Click to expand...


Gun play? About how many times a day to you play with your gun, Gomer?
 
Unclebaldrick said:
Soros must have been busy framing the Saudis.
Click to expand...


th
 
Rob Roy said:
Australia is predominately populated by white Christians who are not allowed to have guns unless they ask and are granted permission from the ruling organization which only exists by maintaining it's policies thru threats of gun use.

The government of Australia loves using guns, that's how they ensure some white people there make most of the money. That's how "Australia" does it...with guns.

I hope that answers the question.
Click to expand...
So your saying that gun control makes the population more wealthy? Interesting but just doesn't make sense.
Mandatory Employer paid superannuation seems to have helped a great deal.
 
Lucky Luke said:
So your saying that gun control makes the population more wealthy? Interesting but just doesn't make sense.
Mandatory Employer paid superannuation seems to have helped a great deal.
Click to expand...

No, I'm not saying that.

I was scoffing at your apparent utilitarian point of view which seemed devoid of any concern with HOW things are done.
 
Rob Roy said:
No, I'm not saying that.

I was scoffing at your apparent utilitarian point of view which seemed devoid of any concern with HOW things are done.
Click to expand...
How things are done?
Its a democracy. Everyone who chooses to enrol to vote has to vote . If the people wanted more lax gun laws then we would have it. if we wanted more strict gun laws then we would have it. I think people are fairly happy with the laws as is. They seem sensible.
Switzerland I believe has a large firearm per household % so I think we can totally discount your very strange reasoning its firearm related or even that firearms are or are not part of social countries.
 
Lucky Luke said:
How things are done?
Its a democracy. Everyone who chooses to enrol to vote has to vote . If the people wanted more lax gun laws then we would have it. if we wanted more strict gun laws then we would have it. I think people are fairly happy with the laws as is. They seem sensible.
Switzerland I believe has a large firearm per household % so I think we can totally discount your very strange reasoning its firearm related or even that firearms are or are not part of social countries.
Click to expand...


So, if a democratic decision to enslave people, (force them to use the fruit of their labor to satisfy another person(s) whims ) passed, you'd be okay with that ?
 
Rob Roy said:
So, if a democratic decision to enslave people, (force them to use the fruit of their labor to satisfy another person(s) whims ) passed, you'd be okay with that ?
Click to expand...
Like the prisons in America do with slave labour?

I think the question was: How do these social based countries keep doing it, is it the universal healthcare or the nearly liveable minimum wages or ?
 
Lucky Luke said:
Like the prisons in America do with slave labour?

I think the question was: How do these social based countries keep doing it, is it the universal healthcare or the nearly liveable minimum wages or ?
Click to expand...


They do it with a gun, which is what the legislation really amounts to I already answered that earlier in this thread.

You are either ignorant of the entire process or chose not to look at how things are really done. Utilitarian arguments often ignore the means used, and the unintended consequences of those means. Apparently you do too.
 
TacoMac said:
They also have the luxury of not having to spend 62 cents of every dollar in their economy on machines of war.
Click to expand...


In order to keep FEDERAL RESERVE debt notes powerful on a global scale, the machines of war come in handy. They are intertwined. Both should be done away with.
 
Lucky Luke said:
Like the prisons in America do with slave labour?

I think the question was: How do these social based countries keep doing it, is it the universal healthcare or the nearly liveable minimum wages or ?
Click to expand...


Some prisons have walls you can see. Some, psychological prisons, feature mental barriers and false dichotomy.
 
Rob Roy said:
They do it with a gun, which is what the legislation really amounts to I already answered that earlier in this thread.

You are either ignorant of the entire process or chose not to look at how things are really done. Utilitarian arguments often ignore the means used, and the unintended consequences of those means. Apparently you do too.
Click to expand...
You sure do talk about guns allot. Think of all the extra guns you could buy with the extra money you might have if you had a more social country.
 
Lucky Luke said:
You sure do talk about guns allot. Think of all the extra guns you could buy with the extra money you might have if you had a more social country.
Click to expand...


You sure do ignore the obvious a lot. Think of all the people you could violate if you used laws (backed by government guns) to force people to buy things they are inclined not to buy.

So would you force your neighbors to buy something from you, even if they weren't interested in buying it? Would that be an example of a "social country" ?
 
Do you think it starts at home? Parents talking about fairness and helping those less fortunate than themselves, that kind of stuff.
 
Rob Roy said:
So, if a democratic decision to enslave people, (force them to use the fruit of their labor to satisfy another person(s) whims ) passed, you'd be okay with that ?
Click to expand...
doesn't our government take our money to fund wars to help wallstreet gain control of other countries wealth. I don't like my money being taken to kill woman and children on the alter of corporate greed. I would prefer my taxes be spent on education and healthcare . socialist believe that workers should be allowed to keep a fair share of the wealth they produce. conservatives believe that workers should only be paid enough to create the next generation of workers and throw out when they are no longer productive. I prefer socialism to the fascism and racism that conservatives embrace
 

Attachments

  • what marxist told you trickle down does not work.jpg
    what marxist told you trickle down does not work.jpg
    40.4 KB · Views: 1
Rob Roy said:
I'm not sure where to start to dismantle your weak and flaccid argument.

Okay, please define "get better results" and why you think that's the only thing that counts.
Click to expand...
No is disputing your personal experiences with the weak and flaccid... Nevermind your arguments.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top