I'm only in a 4 x 4 and when I run a full canopy even under a 600w HID I need to add a small dehumidifier.Bit I'm not running immature plants either. I set it on auto so it doesn't use to much power. Being able to then safety get the 1g per W easily pays for the small cost of running it. Not to mention the piece of mind that having one brings.
Everything is my friends this and I visited this de grow once but nothing of yours so yes you are making shit up because none of what you speak is based off your own experience. I could sit here and post pics of me or a buddy at someone's grow doesn't mean it's mine. You're a data sheet Nazi and you've been exposed and still continue to try and advise people on lights etc. Put up your own grow man even if it's a tomato but you can't because you don't have one. You haven't even used an hlg light or a gavita and you're in here trying to advise on both. Do i really need to go so far as to link your thread asking what hlg light to buy.......?I've been in a lot of decent sized grows using dehps here in colorado. My friend actually runs a DEHPS + CMH setup in his basement and his colas are redicuolously huge, but arent as dense as my LED grown buds grown under similar PPFD levels.
It's basic plant biology that longer internodal distance would cause the flowers to be less dense, as the internodes are where the buds start stacking from.
Im not making up shit bud. It's well known LEDs tend to grow denser flowers than HPS for this very reason. Why do you think sativa dominant plants don't have buds as dense as indicas? Because the internodes are more spread on sativas.
My led buds have been consistently smaller and denser than my hps buds with the same strain. Yields have been on par once I learned the nuances of led growing. If I was still growing in an outbuilding i think I'd probably be running hps because the IR put off by them mitigates some of the need to heat the building during cold months.
This is a production environment. The 4x4s are alternating to mix the led spectrum with the HPS spectrum. You can try and blame it on growing conditions but I won't because except for the large warehouse grows I grow strictly leds and build all of my own lights. Leds are my forte and so far I think even with the top tier leds with over 2.0 ppf, 500 watts isn't quite enough to fully replace a SE HPS. We are redesigning our led lights for ~600 watts.
So have mine I never said the info was incorrect I said we have a poser in here
Lol alright bud. I'm not here to argue with you. Don't know why you're so triggered. This is common knowledge for us LED growers, so if you don't want to listen to it then that's just fine
I'm sorry, i am not trying to be mean, but that bud looks like absolute shit, it looks like a mold fest waiting to happen. not sure what strain, but yuck.I've been in a lot of decent sized grows using dehps here in colorado. My friend actually runs a DEHPS + CMH setup in his basement and his colas are redicuolously huge, but arent as dense as my LED grown buds grown under similar PPFD levels.
It's basic plant biology that longer internodal distance would cause the flowers to be less dense, as the internodes are where the buds start stacking from.
Im not making up shit bud. It's well known LEDs tend to grow denser flowers than HPS for this very reason. Why do you think sativa dominant plants don't have buds as dense as indicas? Because the internodes are more spread on sativas.
It is common knowledge for "us" led growers problem is you ain't one of the led growers. And you keep trying to twist that I'm saying your info is wrong to cover the fact that you're speaking out your ass because you have not done a comparison grow between de and led .You're still shopping for a light. You're a poser, a wanna be, and you're in here running your mouth like you know everything and all your doing is reading data sheets and repeating what you see other people say ..........Lol alright bud. I'm not here to argue with you. Don't know why you're so triggered. This is common knowledge for us LED growers, so if you don't want to listen to it then that's just fine
I agree. My personal experiences so far leads me to believe that I'd want a minimum of 600 w of led to really see 1000w SE yeild numbers.
I agree, not my pic though. It's from some DEHPS grower here on these forums. Just put it there for context. Just asking for mold
Again because you have no experience with the topic at hand. Posting someone else's pic to try and argue on a subject you know nothing about.
Possible. I don't know the guy so I'll politely refrain from getting involved.
correction ... hps does not have very much red relative to the big fat yellow spike. Its that big fat yellow spike that gives hps its deep penetration through the canopy.
Lol how fucking high are you bro?
You have never used a gavita or an hlg light. You even admitted so earlier in this thread don't start back tracking now......
You're right. I never said I did. I was providing info on them, that is all. We already went over this, but you're bringing it back up to make me look like I'm a poser that doesnt know anything about growing. Whatever makes you feel good about yourself....
I mean considering i've pulled as much as 501 grams from 400 watts of blurples (1.25 grams per watt), yes I would count those grows. And no, that isn't including larf, because I didnt have any. I remove any buds that would be larf early on in flowering. For LEDs that are less efficient than HPS, I was plenty impressed, especially considering I paid only $130.
