All I'm trying to do is establish the parameters of the debate to determine whether they're fair. If you're the kind of person who doesn't take ownership of making a fallacious argument after it's been pointed out to you, you're likely to keep making them. At best, that makes you ignorant. At worst, that makes you disingenuous. Either way, you'll struggle to share your values convincingly with anyone of any intellectual credibility.
To reiterate: "
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while refuting an argument that was not presented by that opponent."
You gave the impression (based on your assumptions) that SneekyNinja was for something in particular. Then you gave the impression (based on more of your own assumptions) that he was against something in particular. To complete the straw man, you gave the impression he had presented both conflicting ideas which, by your own admission, he didn't. Refute?