twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
You view government as a parent?Didn't your mom and dad give you a gentle nudge? Maybe not.
You view government as a parent?Didn't your mom and dad give you a gentle nudge? Maybe not.
No, I have never fucked your government. Say hi to your mom for me.You view government as a parent?
No, I have never fucked your government. Say hi to your mom for me.
Ssssh. He doesn't know about his dad.But your government has fucked you.
You in fucking 2nd grade or what?I wonder if you could define charity please.
While you are at it, would you please define theft too?
Thanks.
Tough not to marginalized these types. They kind of force it upon you and self-marginalize.You in fucking 2nd grade or what?
Play your goddamn word games with someone else.
You are supposedly a member of society in 2017. You want society defined too?
Our laws and constitution trump (no pun intended) what you may find self-evident. Get over yourself, Yukon John.It is self evident. For instance if I told a neutral person they were going to associate with me and threatened the use of force to make that happen, would you say that person has the right to refuse my "offer" ?
Where did you learn that forcing a person to associate with you against their will is an acceptable thing, Ted Bundy or The Candy Plantation?
Lol. A point for the Yukon John snipe.Our laws and constitution trump (no pun intended) what you may find self-evident. Get over yourself, Yukon John.
While you may be correct when it comes to personal associations (although your remedies seem oddly paranoid and reactionary), when you decide to form an entity that interacts with the public you are not permitted by law to exclude classes of people from associating with that entity based on certain protected characteristics of those people. Don't like it? Then don't form a public entity that is so constrained. It's as simple as you are.
Viewing government as the parent as you do, to follow this logic the People children gave birth to the Federal parent. Sort of a silly position to take don't you think? I will take your next insult as agreement.No, I have never fucked your government. Say hi to your mom for me.
government as a parental figure is probably more inspiring than a parent who lives in a trailer out in the woods running a knife sharpening biz and arguing that the political shift of the south is all imaginary because it hurts his poor wittle neo-confederate feelings.Viewing government as the parent as you do, to follow this logic the People children gave birth to the Federal parent. Sort of a silly position to take don't you think? I will take your next insult as agreement.
You argue the political shift in the south after civil rights was racism based and cannot name any legislators that voted against that legislation that "switched sides" besides Strom Thurmond.arguing that the political shift of the south is all imaginary
lie some more to cover your lies, liar.You cannot name any legislators that voted against that legislation that "switched sides" besides Strom Thurmond.
So all the white racists switched after civil rights?lie some more to cover your lies, liar.
nice projection, liar.So all the white racists switched after civil rights?
Failure to simply answer yes or no basically means you lie more than a Persian Rug on a rich man's floor.
How does it help your position that the south became less racist as it shifted Republican?nice projection, liar.
what percentage of southern state legislatures were republican before the civil rights vote? how about now?
try not to lie when you answer that one, liar.
demonstrate your thesis with a vinn diagram, fucking half witHow does it help your position that the south became less racist as it shifted Republican?
So you say civil rights vote is what drove racist whites to be Republicans in the mid-late 60's. So naturally the black vote shifted to Democrat about this time correct?
all you ever do is lie.the south became less racist as it shifted Republican
I was raised by wolves.Didn't your mom and dad give you a gentle nudge? Maybe not.
I think any society which tries to justify one person being able to force another person to associate with them is on the wrong track. Do you disagree?Not much on society? I think I understand now.
Oh, clever. Okay, how about for a change you answer a question for me?what's the most voluntary and peaceful part about kicking black people out of stores, bobby? ya fucking neo-nazi bitch.
Tough not to marginalized these types. They kind of force it upon you and self-marginalize.