Anti government in the politics section

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Correct. You democrats making everyone put up a wall to segregate the black folks was, in fact, not a good idea. Your democrat KKK wasn't a good idea either.
democrats, later known as dixiecrats, were conservative southerners. conservative southerners are now known as republicans. the KKK endorsed trump.

any other lame ass nonsense you wish to regurgitate now?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
nope, the electoral history of the south in the last 50 or so years.

you are rather dumb, but you seem to regard yourself as smart. this is not healthy. seek mental therapy.
Really. So the white electorate in the south switched to Republican in the 70's-80's with Regan just as the rest of the country did. Gonna stick with that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Really. So the white electorate in the south switched to Republican in the 70's-80's with Regan just as the rest of the country did. Gonna stick with that?
you are quite the lame ass at trying to tell me the sky isn't blue.

the south used to be friendly to democrats. and dixiecrats. now it is republican territory. this is basic history.

are you denying basic history?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
you are quite the lame ass at trying to tell me the sky isn't blue.

the south used to be friendly to democrats. and dixiecrats. now it is republican territory. this is basic history.

are you denying basic history?
No, I just pointed to a fact of when in the history you drew a parameter for that you deflected as not to refute.

So when did this Strom Thurmond theory of yours happen? He's the only one that actually switched sides you know.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
No, I just pointed to a fact of when in the history you drew a parameter for that you deflected as not to refute.

So when did this Strom Thurmond theory of yours happen? He's the only one that actually switched sides you know.
first of all, your repeated attempt to deflect to some strom thurmond theory is not the issue here. you cannot refute that the south used to be democrat territory, and by large margins. now it belongs to the republicans, ever since that civil rights bill passed. the one that would just make you hate 'em more if you had to serve purples.

second, strom thurmond was not the only person to ever change sides. jesse helms was an avowed opponent of civil rights, like you. and he switched from democrat/dixiecrat to republican. some went the other way, like robert byrd. byrd hated his racist past, so he renounced it, voted yes on civil rights, became a democrat, and earned a 100% NAACP rating. his tale was a tale of redemption.

so you are just plainly false on all counts and an abject moron.

when someone denies basic history like you do, it opens the door to deny events like the holocaust, which i have no doubt that you do.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
first of all, your repeated attempt to deflect to some strom thurmond theory is not the issue here. you cannot refute that the south used to be democrat territory, and by large margins. now it belongs to the republicans, ever since that civil rights bill passed.
I already covered that in part, about half actually in the Souf. Are you coherent? Oh wait no real debates here just name calling and shit. Forgot the "rules" of political discourse here.
Really. So the white electorate in the south switched to Republican in the 70's-80's with Regan just as the rest of the country did. Gonna stick with that?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
I already covered that in part, about half actually in the Souf. Are you coherent? Oh wait no real debates here just name calling and shit. Forgot the "rules" of political discourse here.
i don't know who regan is, but i do know that what "the rest of the country" does is unique whereas the south showed a habit.

this is basic history. you are mentally ill, and you enable holocaust denial.

for 20 elections in a row dating from reconstruction to civil rights, the south was almost 100% democrat. then, once civil rights passed, the south voted for goldwater. then they voted for the racial segregationist george wallace. then they voted for nixon. then reagan. then bush, and dole, and bush again, and mccain, and romney, and trump.

please tell me more about your strom thurmond theory, which contradicts the republican and racial segregation voting habits of the south for the last 50 years, civil rights hater.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
i don't know who regan is, but i do know that what "the rest of the country" does is unique whereas the south showed a habit.

this is basic history. you are mentally ill, and you enable holocaust denial.

for 20 elections in a row dating from reconstruction to civil rights, the south was almost 100% democrat. then, once civil rights passed, the south voted for goldwater. then they voted for the racial segregationist george wallace. then they voted for nixon. then reagan. then bush, and dole, and bush again, and mccain, and romney, and trump.

please tell me more about your strom thurmond theory, which contradicts the republican and racial segregation voting habits of the south for the last 50 years, civil rights hater.
Only one state did not vote for Regan, that's a fact.
So once the Republicans passed civil rights, they were infiltrated at the Goldwater election by Democrat Strom Thurmond, sticking with that?

Strom Thurmond btw I said that many posts back but I guess you are slow.
 
Top