Trump's gonna smash the golden calf

[UncleBuck]

look at this dumb neo-nazi bump his pathetic thread with laughable propaganda.

and his dick doesn't even work. LOL

 

[ArcticGranite]

500 peer reviewed papers is kinda hard on the MMGW theory dontcha think.

 

[abe supercro]

Lol, are trying to tell me that you suck at trolling, Justin case owned me and now I'll tuck my tail and run.

Do you consider yourself a professional troll? Is that why you decide to create a second account, for that purpose?

 

[Justin-case]

Do you consider yourself a professional troll? Is that why you decide to create a second account, for that purpose?

I'm actually being a decent guyattacking or fukn with bigots, phobes or racists. That's how the out of context shit canwork w y'alls gamification.

 

[UncleBuck]

500 peer reviewed papers is kinda hard on the MMGW theory dontcha think.

"notrickszone.com" is almost as credible as NASA and NOAA.



you're a neo-nazi and your dick doesn't work.

 

[abe supercro]

I'm actually being a decent guyattacking or fukn with bigots, phobes or racists. That's how the out of context shit canwork w y'alls gamification.

Alright, maybe you're half-right, a percentage of the time.

 

[UncleBuck]

I highly doubts no tricks is as credible as NASA and noaa.

But hey, those papers in the unread link. 500 peer reviewed published papers. Start discrediting them and you've got something worth posting. Message dipshit. Focus

list those papers then.

let's make sure they actually say what the hack you are relying on says they say.

10 at a time will be good to start.

thanks, jew hater.

 

[Justin-case]

Alright, maybe you're half-right, a percentage of the time.

Context man figure out yourself, don't cry

 

[ArcticGranite]

They're listed in the post already. But...for you. And I wouldn't do this for everyone.

http://notrickszone.com/skeptic-papers-2016-1/#sthash.NBvEOTQ6.dpbs
Part 1. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
I. Solar Influence On Climate (132)
II. Natural Oceanic/Atmospheric Oscillation (ENSO, NAO, AMO, PDO, AMOC) Influence On Climate (45)
III. Natural Ozone Variability and Climate (3)
IV. A Questionable To Weak Influence Of Humans, CO2 On Climate (11)
V. Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity (4)
VI. Modern Climate In Phase With Natural Variability (17)
VII. Cloud/Aerosol Climate Influence (14)
VII. Volcanic/Tectonic Climate Forcing (9)

 

[ArcticGranite]

http://notrickszone.com/skeptic-papers-2016-2/#sthash.3ZyEyw6g.dpbs

Part 2. Natural Climate Change Observation, Reconstruction
I. Lack Of Anthropogenic/CO2 Signal In Sea Level Rise/Mid-Holocene Sea Levels Meters Higher (34)
II. Warmer Holocene Climate, Non-Hockey Sticks (40)
III. No Net Regional Warming Since Early- Mid-20th Century (15)
IV. Abrupt, Degrees-Per-Decade Natural Global Warming (D-O Events) (
V. The Uncooperative Cryosphere: Polar Ice Sheets, Sea Ice (34)
VI. Ocean Acidification? (14)
VII. Natural Climate Catastrophes – Without CO2 Changes (4)
VIII. Recent Cooling In The North Atlantic (3)

 

[UncleBuck]

They're listed in the post already. But...for you. And I wouldn't do this for everyone.

http://notrickszone.com/skeptic-papers-2016-1/#sthash.NBvEOTQ6.dpbs
Part 1. Natural Mechanisms Of Weather, Climate Change
I. Solar Influence On Climate (132)
II. Natural Oceanic/Atmospheric Oscillation (ENSO, NAO, AMO, PDO, AMOC) Influence On Climate (45)
III. Natural Ozone Variability and Climate (3)
IV. A Questionable To Weak Influence Of Humans, CO2 On Climate (11)
V. Low CO2 Climate Sensitivity (4)
VI. Modern Climate In Phase With Natural Variability (17)
VII. Cloud/Aerosol Climate Influence (14)
VII. Volcanic/Tectonic Climate Forcing (9)

that's only 8 and there's only text, no link to the studies.

 

[iHearAll]

well i definitely don't care about any of this. this is a comment stating this.

 

[ArcticGranite]

http://notrickszone.com/skeptic-papers-2016-3/#sthash.g3qhaaqy.dpbs

Part 3. Unsettled Science, Ineffective Climate Modeling
I. Failing/Failed Renewable Energy, Climate Policies (10)
II. Climate Model Unreliability/Biases and the Pause (34)
III. Elevated CO2 Greens Planet, Raises Crop Yields (10)
IV. Wind Turbines, Solar Utilities Endangering Wildlife (7)
V. Less Extreme, Unstable Weather With Warming (15)
VI. Heat Not Hazardous To Polar Bears, Humans (3)
VII. No Increasing Trends In Intense Hurricanes (3)
VIII. No Increasing Trends In Drought Frequency, Severity (7)
IX. Urban Surfaces Cause (Artificial) Warming (4)
X. ‘Settled’ Science Dismantled (3)
XI. Natural CO2, Methane Sources Out-Emit Humans (3)
XII. Fires, Anthropogenic Climate Change Disconnect (5)
XIII. Miscellaneous (4)
XIV. Scientists: We Don’t Know (4)
- See more at: http://notrickszone.com/#sthash.WrXGEFpN.xq1Rwylw.dpuf

 

[ArcticGranite]

list those papers then.

let's make sure they actually say what the hack you are relying on says they say.

10 at a time will be good to start.

thanks, jew hater.

Done. No problem hater. Cogent arguments please. Thanks

 

[UncleBuck]

Done. No problem hater. Cogent arguments please. Thanks

you're just copying and pasting text.

you have no idea what's even in your own bullshit.

 

[abe supercro]

Do you even Global Warming bro?

 

[UncleBuck]

http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016EGUGA..18.3411H

you realize this paper admits the reality of manmade global warming right in the abstract, don't you?

 

[UncleBuck]

Dipshit-open the link. Synopsis is posted under it. Reviled knowledge is only one click away. You can do this!

http://www.tsijournals.com/abstract/sea-level-risesarguing-the-nano-metre-to-defocus-from-the-missedmeter-2941.html

you realize this guy is arguing that manmade climate change is real, but will somehow be beneficial, right?

you're not this fucking dumb to put your blind faith into a goddamn blog, are you?

 

[UncleBuck]

http://www.sciencedirect.com.sci-hub.cc/science/article/pii/S0960077915004233

i'm gonna need you to tell me what this paper says.



thanks, limp dick.

 

[ArcticGranite]

What I'm sure of is the 97% consensus of which there are four of them and all discredited are political constructs that mean zilch.

Presented here are 500 peer reviewed published papers from just 2016 alone that further call that consensus into question. Expect more after 1/20/17