bigger than watergate?

OGEvilgenius

OGEvilgenius

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
nice meltdown, but the question still remains.

if it was about simply exposing corruption, as you claimed, why did they not expose the RNC hacks?

MORON.

still waiting for a single example of pay to play too.

racist shithead.
Click to expand...
RNC leaks would have helped Trump given most of the leadership hated him and they were corrupt like he was claiming anyway.

BTW, 3rd hand anonymous CIA sources - which multiple alphabet agencies including the FBI dispute - making more bullshit to attempt a coup in their own country. Pretty god damn low IMO. Assange has repeatedly stated the source is a leak. No doubt upset with DNC corruption given how blatant and widespread it was.

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/2016/12/cias-absence-conviction/

The CIA’s Absence of Conviction 279
11 Dec, 2016 in Uncategorized by craig

I have watched incredulous as the CIA’s blatant lie has grown and grown as a media story – blatant because the CIA has made no attempt whatsoever to substantiate it. There is no Russian involvement in the leaks of emails showing Clinton’s corruption. Yes this rubbish has been the lead today in the Washington Post in the US and the Guardian here, and was the lead item on the BBC main news. I suspect it is leading the American broadcasts also.

A little simple logic demolishes the CIA’s claims. The CIA claim they “know the individuals” involved. Yet under Obama the USA has been absolutely ruthless in its persecution of whistleblowers, and its pursuit of foreign hackers through extradition. We are supposed to believe that in the most vital instance imaginable, an attempt by a foreign power to destabilise a US election, even though the CIA knows who the individuals are, nobody is going to be arrested or extradited, or (if in Russia) made subject to yet more banking and other restrictions against Russian individuals? Plainly it stinks. The anonymous source claims of “We know who it was, it was the Russians” are beneath contempt.

As Julian Assange has made crystal clear, the leaks did not come from the Russians. As I have explained countless times, they are not hacks, they are insider leaks – there is a major difference between the two. And it should be said again and again, that if Hillary Clinton had not connived with the DNC to fix the primary schedule to disadvantage Bernie, if she had not received advance notice of live debate questions to use against Bernie, if she had not accepted massive donations to the Clinton foundation and family members in return for foreign policy influence, if she had not failed to distance herself from some very weird and troubling people, then none of this would have happened.

The continued ability of the mainstream media to claim the leaks lost Clinton the election because of “Russia”, while still never acknowledging the truths the leaks reveal, is Kafkaesque.

I had a call from a Guardian journalist this afternoon. The astonishing result was that for three hours, an article was accessible through the Guardian front page which actually included the truth among the CIA hype:

The Kremlin has rejected the hacking accusations, while the WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has previously said the DNC leaks were not linked to Russia. A second senior official cited by the Washington Post conceded that intelligence agencies did not have specific proof that the Kremlin was “directing” the hackers, who were said to be one step removed from the Russian government.
Craig Murray, the former UK ambassador to Uzbekistan, who is a close associate of Assange, called the CIA claims “bullshit”, adding: “They are absolutely making it up.”
“I know who leaked them,” Murray said. “I’ve met the person who leaked them, and they are certainly not Russian and it’s an insider. It’s a leak, not a hack; the two are different things.
“If what the CIA are saying is true, and the CIA’s statement refers to people who are known to be linked to the Russian state, they would have arrested someone if it was someone inside the United States.
“America has not been shy about arresting whistleblowers and it’s not been shy about extraditing hackers. They plainly have no knowledge whatsoever.”

But only three hours. While the article was not taken down, the home page links to it vanished and it was replaced by a ludicrous one repeating the mad CIA allegations against Russia and now claiming – incredibly – that the CIA believe the FBI is deliberately blocking the information on Russian collusion. Presumably this totally nutty theory, that Putin is somehow now controlling the FBI, is meant to answer my obvious objection that, if the CIA know who it is, why haven’t they arrested somebody. That bit of course would be the job of the FBI, who those desperate to annul the election now wish us to believe are the KGB.
Click to expand...
 
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
OGEvilgenius said:
RNC leaks would have helped Trump
Click to expand...
so you believe the lamestream media? you think that the intelligence reports, which show that the russians also hacked the RNC, are actually true?

well, if the russians hacked him too, then they probably have information against him. they can probably use him as a puppet if that is true.

imagine the horror if we all find out that the trump campaign directly colluded with vladimir putin. that would be treason, punishable by death.

that would be horrible. a terrible day.
 
H

Hands Bud

Member
"UncleBuck, post: 13199124, member: 251367"]without hillary to beat up, they now have to focus on defending the indefensible: their own savior.

Hillary has a lot more to come [without a pardon] 200,000+ years jail time on the emails alone.


he and he alone will now be the focus of every news report. every scandal, every misdeed, every bit of corruption,
That's not a change, and 90% has been heavy spin or bullshit. They will need to lighten up as their bullshit will wear thin after he's potus.

every national election thrown due to influence of foreign voters

Don't forget ALL the foreign money that she also got.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top