I was listening to DIY Tech Talk#2 on Greengenes Youtube channel with Greengene, Growmau5 and Robin. I found out that i prob should have went with the 80CRI instead of the 90CRI because i was looking at the calculator on Citizen and i actually lost like 27-30 Lumens/watt by going with the 90CRI because of the added phosphor in the 90CRI chip. I guess they were saying that the added little bit of far red is not worth the loss. It makes sense after i went and looked at the numbers. The 90CRI chip only adds a sliver of extra red at the end of the spectrum but at a bigger loss in Lumens/watt. Also causes a pretty substantial loss in the 620-630nm range from the spectrum chart they were showing. What is your take on it
@CobKits?
Without reading further, we all know that it isn't lumens we care about, it is PPFD. For light sources, we are looking for PPF which is just a raw count of photons. Lumens is a weighted measurement giving increased values for certain wavelengths so it means very little for us.
Lumens do provide a bit of guidance but that is about it. As long as you have something that appears somewhat decently efficient then you look into the SPD and figure out what you will have to work with in your environment.
CRI is a quality measurement in respect to lumens. It may or may not have an impact on the number of photons a light source produces but the simplest answer is whichever CRI produces the highest PPF.