ttystikk
Well-Known Member
And that's good for commercial grade; nothing wrong with it.Winter is for basking in the sun in the tropics with harvest done
one grow yearly and thousands of pounds
And that's good for commercial grade; nothing wrong with it.Winter is for basking in the sun in the tropics with harvest done
one grow yearly and thousands of pounds
all wrong, its orange inside and white outside.I'll stick with the nothing will ever compete with it View attachment 3704669
....yeah except for the fact that it gets cloudy in many places...obstructions like surrounding trees, etc. Realistically-speaking, gigantic grows are just not applicable to most growers. But yeah, if I could run the Sun at my will the way I wanted to....can't beat the price, either!I'll stick with the nothing will ever compete with it View attachment 3704669
Larry Niven to the rescue!A little engineering can help nature out...
Kinda irrelevant in the led section lol.Winter is for basking in the sun in the tropics with harvest done
one grow yearly and thousands of pounds
sure if you send me oneBobby_g
Great work men can you do a 1212 3000k cri 70 ? I think thats a very good flowering cob
Plus cob spectrum vs Apogee response curve. Adjusting for that would move accuracy a little more in the right direction too.1825 with BJB holder VS 3590 on Ideal holder is slightly biased in favor of 1825. This is because the BJB holder acts as a small reflector.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/lens-and-reflector-optics-for-cob.893660/page-7#post-12229578
So the test does not give the 1825 COB to 3590 COB comparison but more like 1825 COB/Holder Combo VS 3590 COB/Holder Combo
CLU 048 has a ideal holder so both 3590 and 1818 can be tested with Ideal cob holder.
In my test of CLU1818 BJB vs Ideal i see 1.75% to 1.9% gain with BJB holder.
Tested the new vero 29 sample. Looks like ew vero 29 beats 3590CD.1818 also beats 3590CD. New Vero is very close to 1818 and not enough accuracy to tell which one is better.
Will test some more and share data.