Bernies Core Group.

I told you. Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Londonfrog is a known liar, more of a dispute than a confirmation. Lets not pretend you proved anything but that you know how to take a picture or that Londonfrog has any credibility at all. And insinuating you showed a deed and a lease was just dishonest. My point was that you are stupid and dishonest. So far, you have only supported my contention.
 
Londonfrog is a known liar, more of a dispute than a confirmation. Lets not pretend you proved anything but that you know how to take a picture or that Londonfrog has any credibility at all. And insinuating you showed a deed and a lease was just dishonest. My point was that you are stupid and dishonest. So far, you have only supported my contention.
While I have lied about nothing. You have made rediculous demands when proved wrong Time and again to grasp on to some kind of argument you've made totally unrelated to the original point when you're proven wrong. Your reading comprehension has been shown to be on par with that of a 3rd grader, and you use personal attacks to try and drive points through.

Then, you have the audacity to call anyone stupid...

You seem real bright dude. I quit arguing because usually there's other people you say dumb shit to so I don't even need to attempt at proving your incompetence, because you do a good job of that all on your own. Which is sweet because at least you're doing a good job of something...right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Londonfrog is a known liar, more of a dispute than a confirmation. Lets not pretend you proved anything but that you know how to take a picture or that Londonfrog has any credibility at all. And insinuating you showed a deed and a lease was just dishonest. My point was that you are stupid and dishonest. So far, you have only supported my contention.
What's wrong Red. New girlfriend piss you off again. Feeling the need to gas up and flame on ?
 
While I have lied about nothing. You have made rediculous demands when proved wrong Time and again to grasp on to some kind of argument you've made totally unrelated to the original point when you're proven wrong.you use personal attacks, and you use personal attacks to try and drive points through.

Then, you have the audacity to call anyone stupid...

You seem real bright dude. I quit arguing because usually there's other people you say dumb shit to so I don't even need to attempt at proving your incompetence, because you do a good job of that all on your own. Which is sweet because at least you're doing a good job of something...right?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
"While I have lied about nothing. You have made rediculous demands when proved wrong" < A lie, you proved nothing.
" I quit arguing" Another lie, you're STILL arguing
"you use personal attacks" coupled with " don't even need to attempt at proving your incompetence".
PS You are stupid. And dishonest.
 
"While I have lied about nothing. You have made rediculous demands when proved wrong" < A lie, you proved nothing.
" I quit arguing" Another lie, you're STILL arguing
"you use personal attacks" coupled with " don't even need to attempt at proving your incompetence".
PS You are stupid. And dishonest.
A. Stating that I don't have to prove you are incompetent because you do a good job is a fact, not a personal attack nor an argument.

B. One thing you do have to admit is that I didn't steal any photos off Facebook. You made that claim and were proven wrong. Fact. So I've proven you wrong at least once with physical evidence on here.

Refer to point a.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Stating that I don't have to prove you are incompetent is a fact, not a personal attack nor an argument.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Still a lie and an attack. Claiming it is a fact is another lie and an attack.
 
Once again, you can not dispute my statements so you resort to slander.
dispute what??? that you are a professional arsonist. Did you not tell us all the best way to start a fire with the people inside not knowing before it is to late ? Or am I lying. I fear you not. I live very close to a fire department and my home is insured.
 
Still a lie and an attack. Claiming it is a fact is another lie and an attack.
A. Stating that I don't have to prove you are incompetent because you do a good job is a fact, not a personal attack nor an argument.

B. One thing you do have to admit is that I didn't steal any photos off Facebook. You made that claim and were proven wrong. Fact. So I've proven you wrong at least once with physical evidence on here.

Refer to point a.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Here's evidence of my statement being fact. Saying McDonalds is bad for you isn't attacking McDonald's. That shot is tasty sometimes.

But it's proven to be terrible for you. Just like you show just how incompetent you are.

Again with your reading comprehension because I've never stated how incompetent you are. Just stated that you show that on your own.


....


Apparently you showing your intelligence is a personal attack

...


Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Two really lame replies repeating the same attacks and slander, while denying they are attacks and slander. Arguing with is like arguing with a fencepost. Sure, one always wins, but what has one accomplished? I'll leave you two to your two man circle jerk.
 
Two really lame replies repeating the same attacks and slander, while denying they are attacks and slander. Arguing with is like arguing with a fencepost. Sure, one always wins, but what has one accomplished? I'll leave you two to your two man circle jerk.
Here's you proving exactly what I said.
Make an argument.
8a3e365d181fbef418e67e21ba0ce396.jpg

Proven wrong
dd556f493243b5cd28d0e6107cab2f8c.jpg

New argument.
c28dd9dbf5c53867fbc9764df5096bec.jpg

Bingo.

Rinse


Repeat.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Two really lame replies repeating the same attacks and slander, while denying they are attacks and slander. Arguing with is like arguing with a fencepost. Sure, one always wins, but what has one accomplished? I'll leave you two to your two man circle jerk.
Are you saying you didn't tell us how to start a fire before the people inside would even know ? I remember this quite well. This you cannot deny.
 
Two really lame replies repeating the same attacks and slander, while denying they are attacks and slander. Arguing with is like arguing with a fencepost. Sure, one always wins, but what has one accomplished? I'll leave you two to your two man circle jerk.
Here's evidence of my statement being fact. Saying McDonalds is bad for you isn't attacking McDonald's. That shot is tasty sometimes.

But it's proven to be terrible for you. Just like you show just how incompetent you are.

Again with your reading comprehension because I've never stated how incompetent you are. Just stated that you show that on your own.


....


Apparently you showing your intelligence is a personal attack

...


Lol.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Can

You

Not

Read

Whole

Sentences

?

Serious question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Can

You

Not

Read

Whole

Sentences

?

Serious question.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Red is a master at believing what he wants. No matter. If he decides to believe 2+2= 15 he will convince himself that it is so. It helps with the pain, also makes him a better arsonist.
 
Red is a master at believing what he wants. No matter. If he decides to believe 2+2= 15 he will convince himself that it is so. It helps with the pain, also makes him a better arsonist.
I told him he proves his own intelligence.

Apparently that's a personal attack/argument.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top