Obama's VP

Cr8z13

Well-Known Member
1. For our Jewish friends who usually vote for the Dems: During the speech O'Bama gave in Berlin, in front of 200,000 cheering Germans, he made the statement: "The individual must sacrifice for the good of society." Jewish people ... please revisit the history of your people and remember the millions of murders that took place because of that political philosophy.
You know a person has no arguement when they invoke the Nazis or the Holocaust. Conservatives must really consider those events the gift that keeps on giving.
2. For our Black friends: Joe Biden led the attempt at the "High-Tech lynching" of Clarence Thomas during Thomas' supreme court hearings. If you watched the hearings, you'll remember the shit-eating grin on Biden's face as Thomas completely destroyed him. Biden is nothing more than a gas-bag that has occupied his senate seat since 1972. He's a Washington insider, a power monger and a first class, egotistical, political slut.
High-tech lynching, my ass. Biden tried to block Thomas because he was an incompetent boob that simply did not measure up as jurist or legal mind. He was an ideologue. That was his purpose. Still is. I'm willing to vote for Obama for the single reason that he will prevent more conservatives from ascending to the Supreme Court. One has to admit that despite Bush's colossal failures as president, he still gave his base Alito and Roberts. For people that want to see their civil liberties erode some more, vote McCain. If discriminating against gays, and taking away a woman's reproductive rights is important to you, vote McCain.
 

HotNSexyMILF

Well-Known Member
i hate both mccain and oboma... and there running mates... i used to be for oboma but after looking into him more i can see hes just as flip flopping and two faced as any other democratic or republican presidential candidate

makes me wish we as a people could nominate who we want our candidates to be... we just trust our corrupt parties to pick the people we get to vote on... it dosnt make sense at all
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." ~John Quincy Adams.

We have the right to vote for whoever we want, our forefathers died for that right, write in who you believe the best person is for the job. No one makes us vote for anyone- they lie and tell us we only have two choices and people buy into it.. the people willingly give up their right to choose..

As for Biden.. he goes in the shit pile from my perspective.. along with everyone else trying to take my guns. :finger:
 

medicineman

New Member
"Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost." ~John Quincy Adams.

We have the right to vote for whoever we want, our forefathers died for that right, write in who you believe the best person is for the job. No one makes us vote for anyone- they lie and tell us we only have two choices and people buy into it.. the people willingly give up their right to choose..

As for Biden.. he goes in the shit pile from my perspective.. along with everyone else trying to take my guns. :finger:
They'll never get the guns in Nevada, I hope. Nevadans are pretty serious about their gun rights.
 

GrowRebel

Well-Known Member
Biden is a piece of shit as far as I'm concerned ... him and Obama are nothing but fucking corporatists ... corporate amerika once again makes sure the people have no real choice this Nov.

But to consider McSame ... and approve the last 8 years ... well you are completely fucked in the head ... :spew:
 

HotNSexyMILF

Well-Known Member
Biden is a piece of shit as far as I'm concerned ... him and Obama are nothing but fucking corporatists ... corporate amerika once again makes sure the people have no real choice this Nov.

But to consider McSame ... and approve the last 8 years ... well you are completely fucked in the head ... :spew:
:hump: My thoughts exactly..
 

Microdizzey

Well-Known Member
goodbye middle class!

you know... it's pretty sad. America was suppose to be controlled by the people. look what happened to it! the people have no control anymore. the majority adults work for companies owned by the rich. the entire country has been screwed over by these absurdly rich fucks and their insane hunger for more wealth. and now they want more land for their families, more wealth and fame. but the unworthy, poor Americans are taking up the land they want...
 

ViRedd

New Member
You know a person has no arguement when they invoke the Nazis or the Holocaust. Conservatives must really consider those events the gift that keeps on giving.

High-tech lynching, my ass. Biden tried to block Thomas because he was an incompetent boob that simply did not measure up as jurist or legal mind. He was an ideologue. That was his purpose. Still is. I'm willing to vote for Obama for the single reason that he will prevent more conservatives from ascending to the Supreme Court. One has to admit that despite Bush's colossal failures as president, he still gave his base Alito and Roberts. For people that want to see their civil liberties erode some more, vote McCain. If discriminating against gays, and taking away a woman's reproductive rights is important to you, vote McCain.
The slaughter of six million people in the name of "sacrificing the individual for the good of society" is hardly a gift. It is, what it is ... a bankrupt philosophy. And here we are again, hearing the very same words, spoken from the very same place, by a candidate for the highest office in America. Sig- Heil Comrade!

Clarence Thomas is a constructionist (see the Lopez case) and THAT'S why he was opposed by Leftists such as yourself and the esteemed Mr. Biden and Kennedy. "Progressives" cannot get their fascist agenda passed through the legislature and then get reelected in a predominately conservative/libertarian America, so they rely on collectivist ideologues like Ginsberg to legislate from the bench. In doing so, they are destroying our system of checks and balances. There are very few areas in which I agree with president Bush, but his Supreme Court selections is one area where I agree completely.

Vi
 

medicineman

New Member
The slaughter of six million people in the name of "sacrificing the individual for the good of society" is hardly a gift. It is, what it is ... a bankrupt philosophy. And here we are again, hearing the very same words, spoken from the very same place, by a candidate for the highest office in America. Sig- Heil Comrade!

Clarence Thomas is a constructionist (see the Lopez case) and THAT'S why he was opposed by Leftists such as yourself and the esteemed Mr. Biden and Kennedy. "Progressives" cannot get their fascist agenda passed through the legislature and then get reelected in a predominately conservative/libertarian America, so they rely on collectivist ideologues like Ginsberg to legislate from the bench. In doing so, they are destroying our system of checks and balances. There are very few areas in which I agree with president Bush, but his Supreme Court selections is one area where I agree completely.

Vi
Sig heil is right, if McSame gets in.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Sig heil is right, if McSame gets in.
Thank you for your in depth commentary, Med. :roll:

I agree that McCain has his fascistic tendencies too. But ... in comparison to O'Bama's agenda (which he is very reluctant to reveal), McCain is Thomas Jefferson. ~lol~


Vi
 

Cr8z13

Well-Known Member
Clarence Thomas is a constructionist (see the Lopez case) and THAT'S why he was opposed by Leftists such as yourself and the esteemed Mr. Biden and Kennedy. "Progressives" cannot get their fascist agenda passed through the legislature and then get reelected in a predominately conservative/libertarian America, so they rely on collectivist ideologues like Ginsberg to legislate from the bench. In doing so, they are destroying our system of checks and balances. There are very few areas in which I agree with president Bush, but his Supreme Court selections is one area where I agree completely.
Don't even try to speak to me about checks and balances when this administration has been above the law at every turn. Whether it's obstructing congressional investigations by invoking executive privilege, conveniently "losing" several months of emails that would have actually provided some transparency, spying on Americans without warrants, or that comedy involving Cheney where he argued that he was his own autonomous branch of government. This group of thugs is hardly the model for rule of law. McCain will be no different.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Don't even try to speak to me about checks and balances when this administration has been above the law at every turn. Whether it's obstructing congressional investigations by invoking executive privilege, conveniently "losing" several months of emails that would have actually provided some transparency, spying on Americans without warrants, or that comedy involving Cheney where he argued that he was his own autonomous branch of government. This group of thugs is hardly the model for rule of law. McCain will be no different.
What does "this administration" have to do with collectivist ideologues like Ginsberg legislating from the bench and fascists like Biden trying to destroy Clarence Thomas? Nice attempt at side-stepping the issue though. :blsmoke:

You're not making the common mistake that if one isn't in support of the Democrat Party menu, that one is automatically supporting the Republican Party menu are you?

And, let's say for argument that you are spot on regarding your alleged corruption in the Bush administration ... did you also speak out against the most corrupt administration in the history of the U.S. ... the Clinton administration, or are you a typical Democrat ... stone-blind to the abuses wrought upon the country by Clinton thuggery?

I think you write well, Cr8z, so I'd love to see your comments on the horribly corrupt Clintons. Thanks ...

Vi
 

Cr8z13

Well-Known Member
Thank you for the complement, but I think I'll end my comments here. Clinton had a majority Republican congress that went over his every move with a fine-toothed comb. Everything is on the record. He's been out of office since 2001. Why can't the right-wing stop talking about him? You don't hear me invoking Reagan every time my position is challenged. Still, I never get tired of the old Republican mantra of "blame Clinton". Cracks me up every time. Me, I'll focus on the issues of the day(and tomorrow's) and continue to criticize those in power, REGARDLESS of which party is holding the strings.
 

mockingbird131313

Well-Known Member
Are you willing to put you money where your mouth is Vi, you see my job does drug screening and I can't recieve cookies these days.
Remember last election I was correct and you were out of touch with reality.
Let's say $100 bet? It would be an honor to take your money.

I think there is a serious chance that the popular vote and the Electorial College vote may differ. What happens then, with your proposed wager?
 

ViRedd

New Member
Thank you for the complement, but I think I'll end my comments here. Clinton had a majority Republican congress that went over his every move with a fine-toothed comb. Everything is on the record. He's been out of office since 2001. Why can't the right-wing stop talking about him? You don't hear me invoking Reagan every time my position is challenged. Still, I never get tired of the old Republican mantra of "blame Clinton". Cracks me up every time. Me, I'll focus on the issues of the day(and tomorrow's) and continue to criticize those in power, REGARDLESS of which party is holding the strings.
Umm-Hmmm ... I know, I know ... Clinton is "old news." ~lol~

If ... O'Bama is elected in November, I'll be looking forward to your balanced critique of his administration. You KNOW I'll be here pointing out every step in the Democrat Party's march toward the Reich. :blsmoke:

Democrats ... Marching in lock-step in honor of sacrificing the individual for the greater good of society:


Vi
 

Bongulator

Well-Known Member
I don't see anything wrong with a little patriotism. You know, "Ask not what your country can do for you..."

If more people would do more for their fellow man, and for their government in general, the world would be a lot nicer. I do my part. I've never collected unemployment, even when I could have. I have never accepted a stimulus check from the government, even though I was eligible. (Like the one this past summer, I purposely skipped it.) I have never used an emergency room. I have served in our military, fought in combat, befriended another nation. Even when eligible for Social Security, I will not accept it. I give to several charities every year, and purposely do not ask for any tax breaks because of my charity. I've never availed myself of any VA benefits. I give, not take. I'm more concerned with our collective future; I'm not focused solely on my own needs.

These are all little things, of course. And yet, think what our country might be if more people would make such little sacrifices. My premise is, don't take from the government just because you *can*, but take from the government only when you *must*. I'm a big proponent of self-sufficiency.

Republicans are the "Me Party" and Democrats are the "We Party". Republicans espouse working hard and getting as much as you can for yourself. Democrats espouse working hard, but looking beyond your own personal needs and seeing what people other than yourself need. We've had almost a decade of the "Me Party", and I wasn't really impressed. The last time we had a balanced budget was when the "We Party" led the nation, and I'm ready for that again. Too much "me me me" seems to have a devastating effect on our society.

We're not animals, that we can only care about ourselves. While I'm not in any way religious, Jesus' preaching to help the poor strikes a chord with me. I would rather help pull two or three people out of poverty than achieve wealth for myself. I think if there was a Jesus, he would approve of my life and the way I have lived it.

I'm a Democrat, and proud of it. I'm definitely more about we than I am about me.
 

medicineman

New Member
I'm a Democrat, and proud of it. I'm definitely more about we than I am about me.
Hear hear, I'm liking this philosophy. If more people were like this, the world would be a much better place. Take Note Vi!
 

medicineman

New Member
Thank you for your in depth commentary, Med. :roll:

I agree that McCain has his fascistic tendencies too. But ... in comparison to O'Bama's agenda (which he is very reluctant to reveal), McCain is Thomas Jefferson. ~lol~


Vi
Been hitting the Jug too much eh vi. Someone would have to be drunk to say that, Thomas Jefferson my ass. Maybe Pol-Pot would be more like it. He is for unending war, and for the rich, which is probably why you'll sneak off to the polling booth and vote for him, then claim you voted for Ron Paul. I'm getting wise to your ways.
 

ViRedd

New Member
Bongulator sez ...

"I'm a Democrat, and proud of it. I'm definitely more about we than I am about me."

I suspect that you haven't been mugged yet. :blsmoke:

Vi
 
Top