outlier
Well-Known Member
Interested to hear everyone's opinion on this statement from Canna (http://www.canna-uk.com/problem_solving_coco). Thanks again @Cl@rksville for posting this site on another thread. Some great info on there especially for deficiencies. Just type the nutrient name in the search box (top right). Clarko recommended it to a soil grower. So bookmark it
So here's what they say about Problem Solving in Coco...
My nutes already have everything that calmag has. My coco is House & Garden and I was told by the local hydro store guy I bought it from that it is good quality, buffered, washed, ready to go. My water is rain water stored in a tank and the base ppm is anywhere between 18 and 28. If we get heavy/lots of rain, it must stir up the tank because I always see the ppm rise a bit when it does. Either way it's pretty soft to start with so I have lots of ec to play with. If I full dose on calmag, it takes well over 1/2 the ppm's I can give. Considering that my calmag only has a few nutrients, and my nutes have everything, it makes sense to use that instead. Right??? Cost I see as no issue because the calmag is about the same price (per volume) as my nutes. The calmag route may well cost more because I can add less nutes to achieve the same ppm result.
Thanks to the internecks, newbie growers trying to do the right thing and reading all you can can actually be detrimental to the learning process. Putting all the crap you have to wade through aside, there's so much conflicting info out there. In the end, you just have to find out the hard way and experience it first-hand. Canna seem to be in the game of coco. Yeah they sell coco products, but you don't just go throwing shit like that out there. They must be one of the better sources for accurate info on coco. Their whole business model depends on it. If you buy their coco, they want to teach you how to properly grow in it so that you come back and do it again.
The problem I see is that everyone is banging out the use calmag mantra, when a more educated (you would hope) source says what I believe to be more common sense. Give the plants all nutrients and let it sort out what it does and does not need. Coco robs nutes, yeah they said that, so just give it more nutes! Trying to pinpoint what the plants are and are not using seems pointless to me. Unless you have some serious lab shit going on to find out what molecules are being used and which ones aren't. Don't we just have to sorta wing it and give everything it may need and let nature take its course??
Let me state that I have no opinion either way {yet}. So any attacks should be directed at CANNA and not me. I read that from Canna, it made sense. I'm now putting it to the test. I could have done this the whole time. I found when using calmag, I could only ever get 1/2 the recommended dose of nutes to start with which to be honest has always concerned me. The calcium and magnesium deficiencies do seem to be borderline an issue/not an issue for me so the bit about making it worse over time sort of resonates with me a bit. It may have appeared to subsided but for all I know, it could well be making it worse like they say.
I still see the problems if you fine tooth comb and I'm stumped because I am already full dosing with calmag. The only logical answer is that I can only ever 1/2 dose on the nutes when I use calmag so I never really sorted the problem to begin with. All roads seem to be pointing towards the fact I indeed only band-aided the problem. If that's the case then a lot of other people are doing the same
So here's what they say about Problem Solving in Coco...
I have only just started doing this myself (first grow in coco). If I give the full dose of calmag (which I thought I had to because of c and mg deficiencies), it takes up a boatload of ppm's I can give the plants. If I remove it completely, I would be able to use an aggressive formula of my nutes. I can't add back unfiltered water like they suggest, because I have none.If the water used to mix the nutrients is very soft, the concentration of nutrients will need to be higher or the coco will rob the nutrients and calcium deficiency will begin to occur. This is precisely because of these issues. With the popularity of reverse osmosis systems sky-rocketing, this issue is seen more and more often. Growers plan to use pure water, feed lightly to avoid burn and feed often to keep things pumping. This can be avoided, however, by adding back some of the original water to buffer the water once more. There is no other effective cure and throwing a calcium or magnesium product at the problem will just make it worse over time. Adding a higher concentration of nutrients is a better and safer option.
My nutes already have everything that calmag has. My coco is House & Garden and I was told by the local hydro store guy I bought it from that it is good quality, buffered, washed, ready to go. My water is rain water stored in a tank and the base ppm is anywhere between 18 and 28. If we get heavy/lots of rain, it must stir up the tank because I always see the ppm rise a bit when it does. Either way it's pretty soft to start with so I have lots of ec to play with. If I full dose on calmag, it takes well over 1/2 the ppm's I can give. Considering that my calmag only has a few nutrients, and my nutes have everything, it makes sense to use that instead. Right??? Cost I see as no issue because the calmag is about the same price (per volume) as my nutes. The calmag route may well cost more because I can add less nutes to achieve the same ppm result.
Thanks to the internecks, newbie growers trying to do the right thing and reading all you can can actually be detrimental to the learning process. Putting all the crap you have to wade through aside, there's so much conflicting info out there. In the end, you just have to find out the hard way and experience it first-hand. Canna seem to be in the game of coco. Yeah they sell coco products, but you don't just go throwing shit like that out there. They must be one of the better sources for accurate info on coco. Their whole business model depends on it. If you buy their coco, they want to teach you how to properly grow in it so that you come back and do it again.
The problem I see is that everyone is banging out the use calmag mantra, when a more educated (you would hope) source says what I believe to be more common sense. Give the plants all nutrients and let it sort out what it does and does not need. Coco robs nutes, yeah they said that, so just give it more nutes! Trying to pinpoint what the plants are and are not using seems pointless to me. Unless you have some serious lab shit going on to find out what molecules are being used and which ones aren't. Don't we just have to sorta wing it and give everything it may need and let nature take its course??
Let me state that I have no opinion either way {yet}. So any attacks should be directed at CANNA and not me. I read that from Canna, it made sense. I'm now putting it to the test. I could have done this the whole time. I found when using calmag, I could only ever get 1/2 the recommended dose of nutes to start with which to be honest has always concerned me. The calcium and magnesium deficiencies do seem to be borderline an issue/not an issue for me so the bit about making it worse over time sort of resonates with me a bit. It may have appeared to subsided but for all I know, it could well be making it worse like they say.
I still see the problems if you fine tooth comb and I'm stumped because I am already full dosing with calmag. The only logical answer is that I can only ever 1/2 dose on the nutes when I use calmag so I never really sorted the problem to begin with. All roads seem to be pointing towards the fact I indeed only band-aided the problem. If that's the case then a lot of other people are doing the same