Is any war worth being fought?
- Thread starter Spitzered
- Start date
Florida Girl
Well-Known Member
I would say the Revolutionary War was WELL worth being fought 
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
Your really not THAT sick are you? 
^^YouTube - WAR - What Is It Good For
I believe in FREEDOM FIGHTERS! I believe we should fight for FREEDOM! Do you guys know that we are being taxed (proportionally) more NOW than before the Revolutionary War? Yes, we are now (proportionally) being taxed MORE than when the Brits were taxing the colonies!
The REVOLUTION has begun!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
sidngroovennude
Well-Known Member
we will be fighting wars until everyone comes to america's way of thinking...
High4Life
Well-Known Member
The British Empire controled nearly 3/4 of the world at one stage Only the Zulus and Irish and the yanks paused them. The world would be one british empire
Who knows what would of happened if no one fought back in world war 1 or 2
If your only surival is to fight back then war is worth being fought
Who knows what would of happened if no one fought back in world war 1 or 2
If your only surival is to fight back then war is worth being fought
High4Life
Well-Known Member
Mybe they should go home then every 1s happy
Or do they not want them back home eather .. ?
greenhorn08
Well-Known Member
War and genocide are as natural to this world as flowers. War is an important part of human evolution. Nature is violent, and we are nature.
tampicos
Well-Known Member
nah, its not that natural. it's inevitable at times, maybe even neccesarry sometimes but i think that might be pushing it. And an even bigger part of human evolution is conscience and understanding, as well as free will. Nature doesn't have the will to choose to be violent, it merely acts on balance.
wwII was inevitable, maybe even justifiable.
when leaders and figureheads are assassinated to push war, we are lead to believe retribution is a just cause and those who disagree are branded with shame. if everyone agrees that retaliation is a must, well then you have war. although the agreement steps are no longer even required because nowadays war is fought between individuals with soldiers. the generals and leaders of before were followed eagerly by their men because they believed in the same cause of liberation and freedom. now, the true agenda might be in the dark hidden from their soldiers, leaving them to fight because its their job, not neccesarily because they agree to. War's a last ditch effort to maintain sovereignty when all other politics have failed, not a quick fix because talking failed. In the case of the genocide in africa, i don't know if anyone has issued a statement telling those tribes and factions doing all the killing to stop. a little force might go a long way here without requiring an all out war, if its agreed upon not by just one country.
flowers dont kill people btw(unless you are allergic, then you are screwed)
We TaRdED
Well-Known Member
What a more noble cause than "FREEDOM"?
The REVOLUTION has begun!
RON PAUL REVOLUTION
~PEACE~
tampicos
Well-Known Member
are you fighting with fist's, swords, guns, missiles? to the death or for your cause? does the other have to die for it? or cant you win by fighting in a different way?
fighting does not equate violence, and war very much does.
ccodiane
New Member
..........it was a rhetorical question. The answer, of course, is, of course. If someone bitch slaps your mom, for no good reason, or even a good one, I don't think words would sufficiently express your, dismay. I could be wrong. Maybe there are some real peaceniks left, but I doubt it. They are the, until it happens to them, crowd. Then, when it happens to them, "Kill that motherfucker!".
(How about, someone beheads your mom, for no good reason, or even a good one, and sticks her head on a pike?)
violence=real world
peace=turning a blind eye to violence
Maybe there are some real peaceniks left, but I doubt it. They are the, until it happens to them, crowd. Then, when it happens to them, "Kill that motherfucker!".(How about, someone beheads your mom, for no good reason, or even a good one, and sticks her head on a pike?)
violence=real world
peace=turning a blind eye to violence
ccodiane
New Member
medicineman
New Member
We can always blame a terrorist. No matter what happens accross the globe, there will always be terrorists to blame. The Pentagon aced that one.Nature is life, and life is ultimately a struggle for survival.
ccodiane
New Member
Blame me......I'd kill every last one if I could. "I'm a self described terrorist! Allah AKBAR"........BOOM!
Jihad Watch: "Marauding youths" in France shout "Allahu Akbar"
Spitzered
Well-Known Member
You are right. Their is no terrorism, its a creation of the Pentagon, and Bush of course.
Nobody uses violence or murder to achieve their goals except the US.
Its really US Marines dressed up commiting genocide in Darfur. Actually their is no genocide, it was a creation of MSM and the Zionist's.
We were really responsible for Lockerbie.
The '72 Olympics was just a hoax.
The Moscow Theater and the Russian school was staged (with the help of the Pentagon and Bush) to garner sympathy for Russia.
Some have a closed and one track mind. But is their any reason 'in your advanced stage of reasoning' to justify war? The loss of life, destruction of property and all the evils that come with it?
Its a tough question. So the blame game is much easier.
Nobody uses violence or murder to achieve their goals except the US.
Its really US Marines dressed up commiting genocide in Darfur. Actually their is no genocide, it was a creation of MSM and the Zionist's.
We were really responsible for Lockerbie.
The '72 Olympics was just a hoax.
The Moscow Theater and the Russian school was staged (with the help of the Pentagon and Bush) to garner sympathy for Russia.
Some have a closed and one track mind. But is their any reason 'in your advanced stage of reasoning' to justify war? The loss of life, destruction of property and all the evils that come with it?
Its a tough question. So the blame game is much easier.
