rosswaa
Well-Known Member
Breathes fine (when it works lol) we don't need 6l v8s, we don't have the roads for thatwow thats pretty but how does it breathe with those puny pipes?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Rollitup mobile app
Breathes fine (when it works lol) we don't need 6l v8s, we don't have the roads for thatwow thats pretty but how does it breathe with those puny pipes?
where i live roads blow. you can go looking for a good road butnot many near here.Breathes fine (when it works lol) we don't need 6l v8s, we don't have the roads for that
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Rollitup mobile app
Bikes are where its at for pure fun, corners are your friend!where i live roads blow. you can go looking for a good road butnot many near here.
also i Never see an expensive car really cruising. you might see a random nercedes ir jag coming up on 100mph. But in warm weather bikes at 150 + isnt super uncommon.
the likelihood of catching a skilled driver taking a cornering at competeive speed is wicked rare
EDIT:Sorry i have corrupted this thread.
except that with a cheap driver I may have to change them out 2 or 3 times as often as a 5 year plus driver. trust me you do not want to be around me when I have to break the grow down to service a light.If a driver goes it goes, you still have to climb in and replace it. There's also an expectancy there. I know mine could go at any time so have backups, where as someone might think it'll last so won't need a backup
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Rollitup mobile app
Which is why I said for someone on a budget that's going to be upgrading later on they're fine and get the job done.except that with a cheap driver I may have to change them out 2 or 3 times as often as a 5 year plus driver. trust me you do not want to be around me when I have to break the grow down to service a light.
B, when using a basic lux meter to examine intensity at canopy level what readings would be ideal during flowering with a 11 on / 13 off lighting schedule. Im using vero 29 and cxb 3590s.Yes a very basic lux meter would be good to compare relative intensities over a canopy. Say for instance measuring the intensity of a lamp at a given distance or with a different set of optics. It would NOT be a good way to compare the intensities of different CCT lights sources. For example, 2700k vs 5000k. That's where a quality spectroradiometer comes into play.
BonjourB, when using a basic lux meter to examine intensity at canopy level what readings would be ideal during flowering with a 11 on / 13 off lighting schedule. Im using vero 29 and cxb 3590s.
Thanks for the info.
its so bright in there i dont think 12 hours makes sense. 550w ~10 sq ft.Bonjour
@testiclees why 11/13 for a shorter flo?
Next grow I will try 730nm after lights off 10,15mn and go 14/10
C.U
BonjourQUOTE="testiclees, post: 11810298, member: 833866"]its so bright in there i dont think 12 hours makes sense. 550w ~10 sq ft.
im adding a 54 w uvb bulb next week. im gonna run it maybe 2-3 hrs per day. Im optimistic. the vero alone does great.
Lately I have been experimenting with Arctic MX2. It is faster/easier to apply, less toxic, cheaper and for our appliction it seems to perform just as well as premium paste. The only things I have been able to do to get temp droop lower, run them softer or reduce heatsink temp/gradient by increasing fan speed or increasing heatsink mass and surface area.I don't think there is really any worry with stock applications, where a thorough spread is just as important as transfer impedance.....
I still like the PK1 personally....10% less impendance and costs 60% less than Prolimatech pk3......[Supra's personal choice]
Numbers look good. I finally caved in and got a PAR meter to experiment with (Apogee SQ-120 $100 used). I always complain that it is inaccurate for red/deep red but I liked the point that greengenes made, it will always read low and I can live with that. You mentioned they have adjustments for each color temp of Vero, do they do that for Cree CX also?Sup people. I recently went a different route on a recent DIY build and was wondering how well it performed in a 3' x 3' space. Here are the results:
View attachment 3474197
MX4 is the best on the market last time I checked,I've been using MX for years on computers.Lately I have been experimenting with Arctic MX2.
For six years ( 2008-2014 ) best ( non-conductive & non-corrosive ) thermal paste ,MX4 is the best on the market last time I checked,I've been using MX for years on computers.
Yes ..yup...
1.place
Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut
next is
fischer WLPK 3
the rest is overclockers marketing shit!