The Holy Bible

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
People say "If you put a million monkeys in a room with typewriters, eventually they will write Hamlet" But I really think that that is a COMPLETE over statement, and a more factual statement would be "If you put a million monkeys in a room with typewriters, you will get Genesis"

Hamlet has a plot, with defined characters, and vivid setting... We can't even agree on where or if Genesis took place.

Let's break down a few verses:

Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heavens and the Earth" From what we know, we can take this to mean God created the universe and a small spherical ball to go in that universe.

Genesis 1:3 "God said let there be light" From what we know, we can take this to mean that God created the Sun.

Genesis 1:4 "God saw the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness" Shit... So the sun was lighting up BOTH sides of our Sphere before God separated them...? Was the Earth 1 dimensional at first? This makes absolutely NO sense. As light is created, the darkness just represents where the light is not. So there is no need whatsoever to separate them.

Genesis 1:6 "And God said 'let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters' and so it was so"... If I were to roll a joint and hand it to me, you wouldn't say to me "And Shaggy handed me a joint" it is simply not the right context. You would say "Thank you" or whatever, then later you would be like "I got that joint from Shaggy". When God says "Let there be an expanse and let it separate the waters from the waters" he is talking as if these things have already been done. If I wanted to use words to create land in the middle of the ocean, I would say "Let the ocean floor rise to the surface, and the water be split by its expansiveness". God is just not using the right context to be the creator.

More coming soon.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
OH MY GOD. I made a mistake, but so did the fucking Bible. This "expanse" wasn't the land, the "Expanse" is Heaven (next verse). But if the Expanse is heaven, then God has at this point created heaven TWO TIMES.
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Ok... Next verse

Genesis 1:7 "And God made the expanse and separated the waters that were above the expanse from the waters that were below the expanse" What the fuck?

Genesis 1:8 "And God called the expanse Heaven" So does this mean there is another Earth on the other side of Heaven? Why don't people talk about this more often?
 

vostok

Well-Known Member
I read Hamlet never read Genesis, but have like there music, are you a zealot or something else ...?

1
capitalized : a member of a fanatical sect arising in Judea during the first century a.d. and militantly opposing the Roman domination of Palestine
2
: a zealous person; especially : a fanatical partisan <a religious zealot>
 

Wait, what?

Well-Known Member
Religion was invented to distract the Jews from the fact they lived in the desert without air conditioning
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
Most people in this subforum- the Spirituallity, Sexuality and Philosophy section of RIU- are already Atheists and dont believe in the Bible.

You are preaching to the "choir", Finshaggy.

~PEACE~
 

Finshaggy

Well-Known Member
Most people in this subforum- the Spirituallity, Sexuality and Philosophy section of RIU- are already Atheists and dont believe in the Bible.

You are preaching to the "choir", Finshaggy.

~PEACE~
I am sure some young stoner kid can be helped though.
 

midgetaus

Member
Most people in this subforum- the Spirituallity, Sexuality and Philosophy section of RIU- are already Atheists and dont believe in the Bible.

You are preaching to the "choir", Finshaggy.

~PEACE~
Why would people believe in the bible when it has so many factual inaccuracies. Not too mention the good old "but that was in the old testament"line when confronted with lies that "the word of god" has supposedly documented.
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
Why would people believe in the bible when it has so many factual inaccuracies. Not too mention the good old "but that was in the old testament"line when confronted with lies that "the word of god" has supposedly documented.
Thats a good question.

Some of the Christians will defend the Bible to the death. The Christians believe the Bible with their heart, soul, and mind. Its their belief, and they have a right to believe in anything they want, like the Atheists can too.

Personally, I am in between being a Theist and an Atheist, Im Agnostic. I dont claim to know the ultimate question- is God real?

I am content not knowing, dont get Me wrong, I would love to know, but the fact is that no one knows besides the Gnostics, allegedly.

~PEACE~
 

midgetaus

Member
Thats a good question.

Some of the Christians will defend the Bible to the death. The Christians believe the Bible with their heart, soul, and mind. Its their belief, and they have a right to believe in anything they want, like the Atheists can too.

Personally, I am in between being a Theist and an Atheist, Im Agnostic. I dont claim to know the ultimate question- is God real?

I am content not knowing, dont get Me wrong, I would love to know, but the fact is that no one knows besides the Gnostics, allegedly.

~PEACE~
Well if the Christian god is the REAL god then I happily plead ignorance and gladly denounce him/her/it.


I think I can safely say that the christian God doesnt exist and say it with some conviction.. Christians right to believe what they want is their right... that does not make it true however just due to headstrong belief..
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
Well if the Christian god is the REAL god then I happily plead ignorance and gladly denounce him/her/it.


I think I can safely say that the christian God doesnt exist and say it with some conviction.. Christians right to believe what they want is their right... that does not make it true however just due to headstrong belief..
The Bible is just writting of ancient Jews, its what the ancient Jews believed and then the Christians adopted the Jewish text.

But what do you believe about the Living Christ?

(Im not talking about Jesus either.)

What do you believe about the REAL, LIVING Savior?

~PEACE~
 

midgetaus

Member
The Bible is just writting of ancient Jews, its what the ancient Jews believed and then the Christians adopted the Jewish text.

But what do you believe about the Living Christ?

(Im not talking about Jesus either.)


What do you believe about the REAL, LIVING Savior?

~PEACE~
There is another living "christ"according to CHRISTians?

I dont believe there is a "saviour"

I also dispute the writing of the bible according to what you believe it is... according to the "church" it is the holy word of God... i

ts like having a foot in each camp to say it is the word of god and then others say that its just an interpretation of the word of God... surely God wouldnt leave his word up to interpretation by others...
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
There is another living "christ"according to CHRISTians?
According to Me there is another Christ. Or to be more exact, there is another Man CLAIMING to be Christ.

I'll just be blunt; I believe Im Christ.

I dont believe there is a "saviour"
Yeah, it seems like the whole notion of a Savior is subjective.

I also dispute the writing of the bible according to what you believe it is... according to the "church" it is the holy word of God... i

ts like having a foot in each camp to say it is the word of god and then others say that its just an interpretation of the word of God... surely God wouldnt leave his word up to interpretation by others...
Most Christians believe the Bible is the "Word of God", but they also know there are many versions of the Bible or different translations.

You are reading the Words of Christ right now. Apparently what I write is subjective also and up to interpretation.

~PEACE~
 

midgetaus

Member
According to Me there is another Christ. Or to be more exact, there is another Man CLAIMING to be Christ.

I'll just be blunt; I believe Im Christ.



Yeah, it seems like the whole notion of a Savior is subjective.



Most Christians believe the Bible is the "Word of God", but they also know there are many versions of the Bible or different translations.

You are reading the Words of Christ right now. Apparently what I write is subjective also and up to interpretation.

~PEACE~
Good for you... if it makes you happy however Jesus , the biblical one, is no different to Appalonius.. Jesus won the battle thats all
 

Nevaeh420

Well-Known Member
Good for you... if it makes you happy however Jesus , the biblical one, is no different to Appalonius.. Jesus won the battle thats all
There are many false gods or false christs, including Jesus. A lot of these false messiahs have many things in common. All of these false saviors were worshipped too, like Jesus is worshipped. Maybe one day, Jesus will be known as a long bad fad.

I will now play a video explaining why I drew these deductions.

Zeitgeist

[Youtube]oZgT1SRcrKE[/youtube]

~PEACE~
 

midgetaus

Member
There are many false gods or false christs, including Jesus. A lot of these false messiahs have many things in common. All of these false saviors were worshipped too, like Jesus is worshipped. Maybe one day, Jesus will be known as a long bad fad.

I will now play a video explaining why I drew these deductions.

Zeitgeist

[Youtube]oZgT1SRcrKE[/Youtube]

~PEACE~
So your conclusion that their is another Jesus comes from where exactly?

believing in such a deity would require some form of proof no doubt. otherwise its merely a wishful idea that something does exist...
 

Murphyball

New Member
Most people in this subforum- the Spirituallity, Sexuality and Philosophy section of RIU- are already Atheists and dont believe in the Bible. You are preaching to the "choir", Finshaggy. ~PEACE~
Ya.. I noticed that too.. It kind of takes the fun out of it..
 

midgetaus

Member
Most people in this subforum- the Spirituallity, Sexuality and Philosophy section of RIU- are already Atheists and dont believe in the Bible.

You are preaching to the "choir", Finshaggy.

~PEACE~
The bible is not the be all and end all of religious doctrine and to believe in a book with so many factual inaccuracies and "fairy tales" is something most people grow out of when they are children... it is the equivalent of still believing Santa arrived with Rudolph at the helm of his sleigh
 

fr3d12

Well-Known Member
The bible is not the be all and end all of religious doctrine and to believe in a book with so many factual inaccuracies and "fairy tales" is something most people grow out of when they are children... it is the equivalent of still believing Santa arrived with Rudolph at the helm of his sleigh
I agree, Religion across all divides is only a tool used by various Clergymen to extract money from followers. The Catholic church in America had an operating budget of $170 Billion for 2012, of that 3% or 5 Billion was used for charitable purposes.
 
Top