Choose carefully, my friend.Hands down no one beats the genetics and prices and freebee's of www.sannieshop.com I'm sure a few will verify what I am telling you.
Choose carefully, my friend.
There's many seedbanks that have been quoted so far, Nirvana, Attitude, Speedyseedz, they're all middle men. Sannies, is a breeder, a genetic line, if you will. Breeders like Sannie's sell seeds in bulk to the mentioned seedbanks. They all have slightly different offerings and pricing, but the focus is on the breeder, not so much the seedbank. It's not a big acomplishment to get seeds in the mail, its an acomplishment to grow potent weed that doesn't hermaphrodite, so that's why I say, choose carefully.
For example, myself and many others here have had terrible grows with Dutch Passion, so there is a lot of shitty breeders out there, and it's not so much the money wasted on seeds as it is the time it spent to end up dissapointed. Once you've narrowed down a breeder, stay on the beaten path, I mean, don't buy some oddball strain that seems too good to be true. I think sannies is a good recommendation, although I can't personally speak on their quality.
just to further my point....
http://www.greenpassion.org/showthread.php?t=11516
and that came from my first google attempt, all in all about 30s of research, iam sure i could find more if i were so inclined (which iam not). all iam saying is that every company has its reviews, and not one of them is 100% perfect.
Thats incorrect my friend, sannie does not sell his seeds to any other seed shop, you can only get his exclusive strains from his shop. Like I said before, for the price Sannie's, for the best genetics Sannies, for the best customer service well you get the picture.Choose carefully, my friend.
There's many seedbanks that have been quoted so far, Nirvana, Attitude, Speedyseedz, they're all middle men. Sannies, is a breeder, a genetic line, if you will. Breeders like Sannie's sell seeds in bulk to the mentioned seedbanks. They all have slightly different offerings and pricing, but the focus is on the breeder, not so much the seedbank. It's not a big acomplishment to get seeds in the mail, its an acomplishment to grow potent weed that doesn't hermaphrodite, so that's why I say, choose carefully.
For example, myself and many others here have had terrible grows with Dutch Passion, so there is a lot of shitty breeders out there, and it's not so much the money wasted on seeds as it is the time it spent to end up dissapointed. Once you've narrowed down a breeder, stay on the beaten path, I mean, don't buy some oddball strain that seems too good to be true. I think sannies is a good recommendation, although I can't personally speak on their quality.
fair enough. i was only pointing out that if you look, you will find + and - things about any place your look enough into. as far as a breeder vs a bank, well i would be an idiot to argue something like that. i have no exp with sannies or any other real 'breeder' for that matter, but logic does dictate that it would be a better choice. BrickTop's words on Nirvana makes me think though.... i might just try out Mr. Nice next time, bricks advice has always been sound in the past =DThis guy says he made a mistake NOTHING TO DO WITH SANNIE!! LMAO but good try!
Also Sannie does not sell his seeds anywhere but his own site!! He is not a commercial seed hack he sels his own lines and they are the absolute best for the price and thats not my opinion but FACT! lol
You could at least contextualize your statement, otherwise it's meaningless to me. Anyone can be a hater, but when it's within a certain context it could at least be educational...I would pick from Reeferman's line and or from Mr. Nice Seeds.
As for Nirvana, I would not pay a single penny that had been flattened by a freight train for their gear, not even if a "RealDoll" of your choice came with each purchase. If my cat started breeding I would purchase the strains it created long before I would begin to consider anything from Nirvana. But that's just me.
I have climbed on my soap box enough times here and delivered my sermon as to why I feel the way I do about Nirvana that I did not feel it necessary to deliver the sermon again. It is not a case of "hate," as you incorrectly described it and instead years of learning about Nirvana.You could at least contextualize your statement, otherwise it's meaningless to me. Anyone can be a hater, but when it's within a certain context it could at least be educational...