It's grams per watt of light. It's a generalization for comparison between growers, not for calculating grow costs. It assumes that your running the necessary supporting equipment for whatever light you're running, such as fans, humidifiers, etc.
i wanted to take that approach but not enough rep yet to be so blunt..
It's true though....Eh?i wanted to take that approach but not enough rep yet to be so blunt..
defo true enough. once youve gone through your 2-3grow them numbers become irrelevant. it always seems the people new to growing care so much about it.
exactly my point in post#3 thats what matters.... this works if your personal use or commercial.
I know what makes a plant tick.
That plant needs brawndo
Seconded.
That definitely has more meaning than the ambiguous GPW comparison. It would allow low budget or even commercial growers to determine how to get the best bang for their buck. Then when you switched nutes, lights or changed the environment you would have a standard base of comparison to judge the pros and cons.
I totally agree. The goal should be cost per gram. Not gram per wattThat definitely has more meaning than the ambiguous GPW comparison. It would allow low budget or even commercial growers to determine how to get the best bang for their buck. Then when you switched nutes, lights or changed the environment you would have a standard base of comparison to judge the pros and cons.
We should start a f'n movement!
