Nothing dumber than a flat earther

Status
Not open for further replies.

cat of curiosity

Well-Known Member
because salad is lethal... they never flush the lettuce, cucumber, tomato... bleh...

vegetarians are the most unhealthy eaters on earth
 

Excessive_Toker

Well-Known Member
Some of you need to practice your lying because you suck at it. If you did study the Old Testament you would have started with page 1 and Genesis. It's how God created the Earth, moon, sun and the firmament. Pseudo science is what you Globetards have put your faith in. If you lie keep it real make it a art. How many miles was it to that Chicago skyline? According to your scientist it's 8 inches squared per mile that the earth curves.
"It is far better to grasp the universe as it really is than to persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring." ~ Carl Sagan

Mr. Retired Guerilla, if forced to present evidence in a court of law, what evidence would you present to argue your side that one, the Earth is flat, and second, there is a God?
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
Actually, he goes completely beyond stupid with that remark.

Genesis doesn't discuss the universe at all. Here is Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Where is the universe in that? Well, it doesn't exist because man was ignorant of how things worked 4000 years ago when they wrote that.

Genesis, in it's ignorance, only discusses what the men who wrote it knew at the time: the earth, the land, the sea, two great lights (one for day and one for night, they were not referred to as a sun or moon) and the stars. It goes on to discuss animals. Whoop-DEE-fucking-do.

That's it. Unfortunately for us, completely uneducated people such as him believe more in what complete idiots wrote 4000 years ago than they do in what's right in front of their face.

On a side note, the Egyptians already knew about planets, math, and were pretty good engineers as well while the men who wrote the Bible were living in caves telling stories...which is why the pyramids and other Egyptian structures (and their own bodies) still stand to this day and there's...well...nothing really on this earth that the men who wrote the Bible left behind other than fairy tales they told by the light of a camp fire that their children grew up believing as reality.
 

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
Actually, he goes completely beyond stupid with that remark. NASA uses fish eye lenses on their cameras to distort but your swollen Down syndrome
headed ass wouldn't know that. You also didn't know that Sagan wrote a book about the bastardizing of science by the west. The globe theory crushes your fucked up atheist ass and makes you look like a fool. Thats why it scares you . Don't you know you have a spirit? There is a god and we aren't here by some random cosmic accident. You ever heard of the missing link? We didn't evolve from primates.
Genesis doesn't discuss the universe at all. Here is Genesis 1:1: In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.

Where is the universe in that? Well, it doesn't exist because man was ignorant of how things worked 4000 years ago when they wrote that.

Genesis, in it's ignorance, only discusses what the men who wrote it knew at the time: the earth, the land, the sea, two great lights (one for day and one for night, they were not referred to as a sun or moon) and the stars. It goes on to discuss animals. Whoop-DEE-fucking-do.

That's it. Unfortunately for us, completely uneducated people such as him believe more in what complete idiots wrote 4000 years ago than they do in what's right in front of their face.

On a side note, the Egyptians already knew about planets, math, and were pretty good engineers as well while the men who wrote the Bible were living in caves telling stories...which is why the pyramids and other Egyptian structures (and their own bodies) still stand to this day and there's...well...nothing really on this earth that the men who wrote the Bible left behind other than fairy tales they told by the light of a camp fire that their children grew up believing as reality.
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
NASA uses fish eye lenses on their cameras to distort but your swollen Down syndrome headed ass wouldn't know that.
Really?

Now comes the payoff for all concerned. This is where all doubt is removed from you being a complete idiot. I've been waiting for this all day long.

You see, I posted that picture for a particular reason. I knew that you, being the complete idiot you are, would sit around all day trying to look for it and trying to come up with a solution for how it was faked.

You got baited.

NASA didn't take that picture.

I did.

That picture came from Kodak 400 speed film in an old Minolta 400si autofocus through a 35-80mm zoom lens. I shot it out the side of a U2-C trainer at 68,000 feet in the spring of 1994.

I donated the picture to GPB (The Georgia division of PBS) in the winter of 1995.

Dumbass.

This is the part where you stop posting and go away.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
Really?

Now comes the payoff for all concerned. This is where all doubt is removed from you being a complete idiot. I've been waiting for this all day long.

You see, I posted that picture for a particular reason. I knew that you, being the complete idiot you are, would sit around all day trying to look for it and trying to come up with a solution for how it was faked.

You got baited.

NASA didn't take that picture.

I did.

That picture came from Kodak 400 speed film in an old Minolta 400si autofocus through a 35-80mm zoom lens. I shot it out the side of a U2-C trainer at 68,000 feet in the spring of 1994.

I donated the picture to GPB (The Georgia division of PBS) in the winter of 1995.

Dumbass.

This is the part where you stop posting and go away.
owned-lions.jpg

Lol, RG edited his post to remove his response, and apparently has something against children with Down syndrome.
"NASA uses fish eye lenses on their cameras to distort but your swollen Down syndrome headed ass wouldn't know that."
 

TacoMac

Well-Known Member
That is one incredible picture, especially since it was taken from a reconnaissance aircraft.
The picture really doesn't do the view justice. To see it with your own eyes is simply breathtaking.

On another note, I shot the entire roll up there. With the helmet on, you can't use the view finder so you have no idea how you're actually framed or focused. You just shoot it all and hope for the best.

That was the only picture that turned out well out of 36 shots.

The most terrifying part of the voyage: landing. Even though they warn you about it, it's still scary as hell when you fall over to the side at the end.

Oh...and I still have the camera that took that picture going on 24 years ago. :)
 

Grandpapy

Well-Known Member
The picture really doesn't do the view justice. To see it with your own eyes is simply breathtaking.

On another note, I shot the entire roll up there. With the helmet on, you can't use the view finder so you have no idea how you're actually framed or focused. You just shoot it all and hope for the best.

That was the only picture that turned out well out of 36 shots.

The most terrifying part of the voyage: landing. Even though they warn you about it, it's still scary as hell when you fall over to the side at the end.

Oh...and I still have the camera that took that picture going on 24 years ago. :)
We all wanted to be part of the future even if it was from a viewfinder.


it's still that way but we've become fixed on inner-space. lol
 

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
We all wanted to be part of the future even if it was from a viewfinder.


it's still that way but we've become fixed on inner-space. lol
So if you can see a 747 as a tiny speck at 35,000 feet how is it you can see a satellite 100 miles up? Illogical to say the least. Satellites are much smaller than a 747. What propulsion system does it use? If the earth is just one of billions of planets in billions of galaxies then the ideas of God, creation and a specific purpose for earth and human existence becomes highly implausible. We then sacrifice our souls at the altar of materialism and become obsessed with consumerism. Everyday you see people sitting in traffic all up tight in their little metal boxes on their way to work a job they hate to buy shit they don't need.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
So if you can see a 747 as a tiny speck at 35,000 feet how is it you can see a satellite 100 miles up? Illogical to say the least. Satellites are much smaller than a 747. What propulsion system does it use? If the earth is just one of billions of planets in billions of galaxies then the ideas of God, creation and a specific purpose for earth and human existence becomes highly implausible. We then sacrifice our souls at the altar of materialism and become obsessed with consumerism. Everyday you see people sitting in traffic all up tight in their little metal boxes on their way to work a job they hate to buy shit they don't need.
Speculation pure and simple.
How about addressing @TacoMac 's pic & please explain that one into a conspiracy box.

Really?

Now comes the payoff for all concerned. This is where all doubt is removed from you being a complete idiot. I've been waiting for this all day long.

You see, I posted that picture for a particular reason. I knew that you, being the complete idiot you are, would sit around all day trying to look for it and trying to come up with a solution for how it was faked.

You got baited.

NASA didn't take that picture.

I did.

That picture came from Kodak 400 speed film in an old Minolta 400si autofocus through a 35-80mm zoom lens. I shot it out the side of a U2-C trainer at 68,000 feet in the spring of 1994.

I donated the picture to GPB (The Georgia division of PBS) in the winter of 1995.

Dumbass.

This is the part where you stop posting and go away.
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
You just hooked into a network of terrestrial based dishes. This is old technology dude they bounce signals off the ionosphere/sky/dome. You may need to look that up because you keep ignoring the fact it exist. The IONOSPHERE sky or dome is electrically charged. I never suggested anyone read the bible. The Earth is not in a state of weightlessness so who cares. I liked soap bubbles too don't forget about them. The Earth is only 70% water not 100%. You have no clue about my past. PEACE May every bowl be greens my friend.
You are truly retarded if you think satellites are land based.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
I shot it out the side of a U2-C trainer at 68,000 feet in the spring of 1994.
So you have no explanation for the photo other than he's lying?
Why should he (other than he's obviously part of the conspiracy).

Lol - Gold Tinfoil hat recipient.
 

RetiredGuerilla

Well-Known Member
So you have no explanation for the photo other than he's lying?
Why should he (other than he's obviously part of the conspiracy).

Lol - Gold Tinfoil hat recipient.
NASA uses fish eye lenses to distort. The ionosphere is electrically charged. Terrestrial based satellite dishes bounce signals off of it. IONOSPHERE look it up. Ask him his altitude and what he was wearing. He's a liar I can prove it.
 

GreatwhiteNorth

Global Moderator
Staff member
NASA uses fish eye lenses to distort. The ionosphere is electrically charged. Terrestrial based satellite dishes bounce signals off of it. IONOSPHERE look it up.
Deflection on your part.
NASA did not take that pic & he told you what camera/lens he used.
Please try and explain away the photo.

Go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top