VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
The appeal needed to be filed by August 28, 2015. It was all Hitler's boys....
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/medical-marijuana-class-action-against-health-canada-certified-by-federal-court-1.3171897
Medical marijuana class action against Health Canada certified by Federal Court
- Thread starter gb123
- Start date
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/nova-scotia/medical-marijuana-class-action-against-health-canada-certified-by-federal-court-1.3171897
Gquebed
Well-Known Member
Thank you.
If anything is to be had from this....some seed money would be great. Or maybe some grow euipment.
And like the thought of HC buying me some weed stuff...lol
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
I'd like to know what they are basing the appeal on...it's only to prevent the case from moving forward. I know my privacy was breached and nothing they can say changes that. If the class action does not go ahead, I will sue them myself. There is nothing preventing 40000 individual suits being filed...
Gquebed
Well-Known Member
You can never appeal a judge's decision. But you can question (appeal) the legality of the process a judge has used to make the decision. This way a new judge can overturn another judge's decision without making that judge look bad.
doingdishes
Well-Known Member
i think it has to be from a higher judge.
the example i can use here is CONroy's appeal for us to make changes etc. he went to Phelan who is the same level as Manson so Phelan had no authority to over rule against Manson.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
No. Tax dollars are used to settle all the time. Whatever amount I am awarded is a few less dollars to be wasted somewhere else. It's a win,win.
i'm not in canada, but in the usa it just gets passed on to the tax payers. u already lost when they sent u the letter, now the settlement will come from your pocket as well as all other tax payers. don't get me wrong, i think the assholes should pay just not with tax payers money.
VIANARCHRIS
Well-Known Member
I hear what you are saying, but it don't work that way. I'd like nothing better than for Stevie Harper to write me a cheque from his personal account, but that money was stolen from the taxpayer too. The taxpayer is on the hook for everything a government does. The way I look at it is that money has already been collected and will be spent. I'd rather some of it go to me than be wasted elsewhere.
not solely for the lawsuit, but taxes will go up. u can bank on it.
So what you're saying is we should deny people justice because taxes will go up? They're going to go up either way so why not try to right the wrong? I don't get your logic.
logic when talking of governments??? i don't think so.
get new governments...
itsmehigh
Well-Known Member
Funny how some people see cash as justice. The damage has been done, how is a couple bucks going to fix anything. People who were responsible should be held accountable, not the tax payers. There's no justice if the ones responsible are not disciplined. It's not their cash it's ours........why should your neighbour pay for a bureaucrats action. As a person who's privacy was breeched I would be more satisfied if the people responsable lost their jobs instead of a few buck, that would be justice in my eyes.
Itsme.
Itsme.
Last edited:
JungleStrikeGuy
Well-Known Member
Restitution is a key tenet of the justice system, by this reasoning why should costs ever be awarded? Or why should any settlement ever happen?
Canadians privacy was infringed, and the government is liable for those actions. This is no different than if a private company had sent out the letters. The 'OMG TAXPAYER' argument is one favoured by the Harper camp. The government screwed up, the government is liable, end of story.