• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Legal to grow and possess illegal to sell

Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
londonfog said:
Rape, slavery, and oranges with me
Rape, slavery, and poop for you
Rape, slavery, and prohibitionist for Chesus.

all guaranteed rape and slavery
Click to expand...
You failed to mention the pilfered soiled ladies underwear that you harbor in your secret drawer in the back closet of your laundromat. C'mon let's not forget that one!
 
londonfog

londonfog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
You failed to mention the pilfered soiled ladies underwear that you harbor in your secret drawer in the back closet of your laundromat. C'mon let's not forget that one!
Click to expand...
well if you mom would stop leaving her shitty panties at my place...
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
I don't believe a child can consent to sex
You do Rob Roy
Click to expand...
That's an inaccurate, shallow and intentionally misleading portrayal on your part. It implies a universal assumption or endorsement of a heinous act on my part, which is false, Prohibitionist.

I don't believe a person that hasn't consented or is incapable of consenting, can consent.

A person that IS capable of consenting could consent to something. The subject matter is secondary, (I know you do like to talk about child sex though). First the ability to consent or the inability to consent of the individual must be known. If an individual person can't consent, at any age they can't consent, ditto, if a person can consent, they can consent.

As an aside, and to throw you a bone, I'll remind you I already said at 13, I'd have banged an 18 year old lass. Were you still jerking off over the ladies underwear section of the sears catalog then or were you a National Geographic guy?

Okay, back on topic, I'll continue talking over your pointed head now...

You apply a universal rule across a diverse spectrum of subjects, a pattern common to Prohibitionist collectivists like you. Generally speaking we agree that the younger a person is the less likely they have developed the cognitive ability to know the consequences of their actions. We also seem to agree that a mismatched in age couple is something we share an aversion to, which could be culturally learned in some cases I suppose. None of that negates the possibility that a "child" of 17 could consent to sex with an "adult" of 18 though does it?

When did you think you reached the age you could provide consent ?

If a "child" of 17 can consent to sex, is that consent limited to an age range that you and I might find appropriate or is it limited to the age range set by the person giving the consent?

If the age range is externally fixed then it actually removes the ability of the 17 year old to consent to all of the potential possibilities, since consent is an individual thing and none of us can logically restrict the range to a set of variables we have established for another person. That would change what consent is and replace it with a range of variables,which create the NEGATION of actual consent, by the inclusion of the externally set parameters.



Also, your arms are skinny and I have to go shoot some flying monkeys. See you later, Prohibitionist.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That's an inaccurate, shallow and intentionally misleading portrayal on your part. It implies a universal assumption or endorsement of a heinous act on my part, which is false, Prohibitionist.

I don't believe a person that hasn't consented or is incapable of consenting, can consent.

A person that IS capable of consenting could consent to something. The subject matter is secondary, (I know you do like to talk about child sex though). First the ability to consent or the inability to consent of the individual must be known. If an individual person can't consent, at any age they can't consent, ditto, if a person can consent, they can consent.

As an aside, and to throw you a bone, I'll remind you I already said at 13, I'd have banged an 18 year old lass. Were you still jerking off over the ladies underwear section of the sears catalog then or were you a National Geographic guy?

Okay, back on topic, I'll continue talking over your pointed head now...

You apply a universal rule across a diverse spectrum of subjects, a pattern common to Prohibitionist collectivists like you. Generally speaking we agree that the younger a person is the less likely they have developed the cognitive ability to know the consequences of their actions. We also seem to agree that a mismatched in age couple is something we share an aversion to, which could be culturally learned in some cases I suppose. None of that negates the possibility that a "child" of 17 could consent to sex with an "adult" of 18 though does it?

When did you think you reached the age you could provide consent ?

If a "child" of 17 can consent to sex, is that consent limited to an age range that you and I might find appropriate or is it limited to the age range set by the person giving the consent?

If the age range is externally fixed then it actually removes the ability of the 17 year old to consent to all of the potential possibilities, since consent is an individual thing and none of us can logically restrict the range to a set of variables we have established for another person. That would change what consent is and replace it with a range of variables,which create the NEGATION of actual consent, by the inclusion of the externally set parameters.



Also, your arms are skinny and I have to go shoot some flying monkeys. See you later, Prohibitionist.
Click to expand...
TLDR
So can a child of 13 consent to having sex with an adult?

Use English words with 3 letters or less.
Like Yes or No
 
Last edited:
UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
That's an inaccurate, shallow and intentionally misleading portrayal on your part. It implies a universal assumption or endorsement of a heinous act on my part, which is false, Prohibitionist.

I don't believe a person that hasn't consented or is incapable of consenting, can consent.

A person that IS capable of consenting could consent to something. The subject matter is secondary, (I know you do like to talk about child sex though). First the ability to consent or the inability to consent of the individual must be known. If an individual person can't consent, at any age they can't consent, ditto, if a person can consent, they can consent.

As an aside, and to throw you a bone, I'll remind you I already said at 13, I'd have banged an 18 year old lass. Were you still jerking off over the ladies underwear section of the sears catalog then or were you a National Geographic guy?

Okay, back on topic, I'll continue talking over your pointed head now...

You apply a universal rule across a diverse spectrum of subjects, a pattern common to Prohibitionist collectivists like you. Generally speaking we agree that the younger a person is the less likely they have developed the cognitive ability to know the consequences of their actions. We also seem to agree that a mismatched in age couple is something we share an aversion to, which could be culturally learned in some cases I suppose. None of that negates the possibility that a "child" of 17 could consent to sex with an "adult" of 18 though does it?

When did you think you reached the age you could provide consent ?

If a "child" of 17 can consent to sex, is that consent limited to an age range that you and I might find appropriate or is it limited to the age range set by the person giving the consent?

If the age range is externally fixed then it actually removes the ability of the 17 year old to consent to all of the potential possibilities, since consent is an individual thing and none of us can logically restrict the range to a set of variables we have established for another person. That would change what consent is and replace it with a range of variables,which create the NEGATION of actual consent, by the inclusion of the externally set parameters.



Also, your arms are skinny and I have to go shoot some flying monkeys. See you later, Prohibitionist.
Click to expand...
Holy mother of meltdowns!

So do you believe a 9 year old can consent to sex with an adult?

I say no.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
TLDR
So can a child of 13 consent to having sex with an adult?

Use English words with 3 letters or less.
Like Yes or No
Click to expand...
Can a baby of days/weeks old consent to a pervert Rabbi sucking their penis and then chopping part of the top off?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top