• Here is a link to the full explanation: https://rollitup.org/t/welcome-back-did-you-try-turning-it-off-and-on-again.1104810/

Legal to grow and possess illegal to sell

UncleBuck

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
mollymcgrammar said:
In a weird way i agree with buisnesses having the right to refuse service for any reason. I supported gay marriage but also take the side of the christain bakers. If society doesn't like it they can boycott the buisness.

All in all, the only thing this thread has accomplished was proving rob is a fucking retard.
Click to expand...
it also let us know you are OK with kicking people out of stores based on their skin color.

but you are totally not racist.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
Well then you don't agree with yourself. You already posted one of the benefits of your lame plan was to prevent prices from dropping...hence protectionism.

Seriously, I almost feel bad for you, beating your ass is getting boring though. See you around, Prohibitionist.
Click to expand...
 
Fogdog

Fogdog

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
No, by "protecting dealers" via preventing sales, all of the likely providers of cannabis will not be in the pool of product providers.

Your goal was to keep large scale growers out who would use economies of scale. Remember you posted a picture of a big ass machine harvesting hemp ?

You seem a little frustrated that I've been calling you a Prohibitionist. If you want to prohibit something, via a law, which term should be used? I think Prohibitionist fits you well

Also, I'd appreciate it if you'd leave my mother out of this, she's a really nice lady.
Click to expand...
Why do you hate the idea of people growing and not selling?
 
heckler73

heckler73

Well-Known Member
If people are allowed to grow, can one sell the service of growing it?
That's a grey area that comes out of this idea. It's just like U-Brews; one can sell the service, but not the product.
In the case of U-brew, you (the customer) have to put the yeast in. That seems to be where the gov't draws the line, so how would that translate to weed? You need to put the seed/clone in. Done...the service provider is then legally able to takeover all the way to trimming and curing. You just "bought" some product for all intents and purposes.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
heckler73 said:
If people are allowed to grow, can one sell the service of growing it?
That's a grey area that comes out of this idea. It's just like U-Brews; one can sell the service, but not the product.
In the case of U-brew, you (the customer) have to put the yeast in. That seems to be where the gov't draws the line, so how would that translate to weed? You need to put the seed/clone in. Done...the service provider is then legally able to takeover all the way to trimming and curing. You just "bought" some product for all intents and purposes.
Click to expand...
Sounds good to me.
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Sounds good to me.
Click to expand...
So instead of legalisation you'd want a roundabout way of making it legal to sell, sort of.

Why not just have it so you can grow it freely yourself but if you wish to engage in commerce then you need a business license and to pay all the relevant taxes?

Seems more sensible to me.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
So instead of legalisation you'd want a roundabout way of making it legal to sell, sort of.

Why not just have it so you can grow it freely yourself but if you wish to engage in commerce then you need a business license and to pay all the relevant taxes?

Seems more sensible to me.
Click to expand...
Because it's distasteful to the average voter.

All I am proposing, been proposing and advocating for its something that would pass on a vote

I'm not against commercial sales. I just know it complicates the fuck out of getting it approved and we still have too many people that equate weed with ctiminals
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
Fogdog said:
Why do you hate the idea of people growing and not selling?
Click to expand...

It's a generic objection on my part, the substance is irrelevant.

If people do not have the ability to engage in free trade with other consenting people, part of their freedom has been usurped using coercive means. To go along with that is inconsistent with my core philosophy.

I don't own others, therefore I have no right to prevent others from engaging in free trade and will not encourage other people, other groups of people, etc. to own others etc., it's the source of many human problems. The solution to force cannot come from a law that has its operational means steeped in force.
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Harrekin said:
So instead of legalisation you'd want a roundabout way of making it legal to sell, sort of.

Why not just have it so you can grow it freely yourself but if you wish to engage in commerce then you need a business license and to pay all the relevant taxes?

Seems more sensible to me.
Click to expand...
It's more like this.
It would be easier to convince people to let me grow pot for myself than tell them I want to sell weed

And truthfully I have no interest in selling weed
 
C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Rob Roy said:
I've heard flying monkeys may descend from the trees if people act like they own themselves. I'm not a big fan of flying monkeys.
Click to expand...
Your sole drive in life must be to annoy people.
What a sick little fuck you are.
Rob Roy is a pedophile.

You are moving up in Google rankings
 
Rob Roy

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Your sole drive in life must be to annoy people.
What a sick little fuck you are.
Rob Roy is a pedophile.

You are moving up in Google rankings
Click to expand...
No, one of the driving forces in my life is to advance individual freedom and peace. I try to do that by proliferating the idea that we all own ourselves, but none of us own others.

I'm sorry you are unhappy with how your masters are running the Wisconsin plantation, maybe you can vote in new masters that will only whip you on alternating days and "let" you grow a plant if you nibble the nutsack of the state with slavish fervor and give them money for a "license" to own yourself.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top