Grove Bags. Why the hype?

What do you think about Grove Bags?

  • Legit - They work.

  • A Con - Marketing BS.

  • Undecided


Results are only viewable after voting.

GangaDownUnder

Well-Known Member
What am I missing when it comes to Grove Bags?

I will quickly say that I've never used them, but I did recently buy some that will be putting to the test in a few weeks.

Anyways, it seems the big marketing claims that eveyone is talking about on the forums and such is the fact that they don't need to be burped because of their patented "Terploc" technology that regulates the humidity and oxygen blah blah.

But this is where they've already lost me.

The whole point of burping was, to me, because nobody has moisture probes, we needed to slow the dry down for the last few percent to avoid overdrying and get a more even moisture distribution. Because it would be hard to go straight to that 60% required in one go without a perfect slow dry and the use of moisture probes. So we dry to say under 70% and then jar it with a cheap atmospheric humidity decector inside, burping until we slowy get to 60%.

Ummm, so how is that any different to Grove Bags?

The buds need to be at 60% moisture in order to seal the Grove Bags in the first place...so yeah obviously Grove Bags dont need to be burped. But then of course you'll need moisture probes to be able to determine that moisture content. But nobody has them, right? Right. So as Grove says on their website, "if you think the cannabis is too wet still burp it in the bag for 3-4 days" and then seal the bag.
Capture+_2022-10-23-03-40-39.png

So they DO need to be burped exactly the same as a mason jar unless you've got the moisture probes! But if you've got the moisture probes, then why couldn't I just dry them to 60% and go straight to the mason jars...and like magic I've invented "burp-less mason jars with patented TerpKeep technology" according to Grove Bags logic.

So yeah the whole "doesn't need to be burped" thing is completely wrong it seems. And there goes one of the reasons, if not the only major reason (for me), to use them.

They claim that their TerpLoc technology creates "The perfect cannabis environment" because of the following properties: Durability, Odour, Oxygen, Anti-Static, Humidity, UV.
Capture+_2022-10-23-15-20-38~2.png

Well, that all seems like crap marketing to me as well.
Durability: okay, jars are durable. I'm usuing the same jars I was 10 years ago...no way I could be using these in ten years. So yeah, real durable.
Odour: right well if its sealed then its sealed isnt it and the smell wont get out. I can't smell my buds when they're in a jar either.
Anti-Static: I never had a problem with static and it really wouldn't be a big deal anyways.
Humidity: again, if its sealed then its sealed...so it will maintain the humidity the same as a jar.
UV: this is just irrelevant since I don't think anyone stores their weed in the sun. A jar in the dark will be the same as the bags.
And lastly Oxygen: this is the only one that MIGHT have some merit. But really how much of a problem will oxygen degredation be for the general grower? Maybe if you were storing your weed for years...but a few months aint going to do shit either way.

And then you see shit like the slider comparsion picture they have on their website showing how weed ages in a Grove Bag compared to a regular bag. Even that is low effort marketing bs. I mean, its just the exact same photo that they've opened in photoshop multiple times and made it darker. If it actually worked like that then why not actually do the experiment and take actual photos. Or if you're going to fake it why not move the bag around between shots so it doesn't clearly look like the same picture...making them just seem dishonest.
Capture+_2022-10-23-03-35-21.png
Capture+_2022-10-23-03-35-29.png

So yeah I dont know what I'm missing about the Grove Bags, but it all just seems like marketing BS to me. The copious good reviews mean nothing when theres a million and one other products out there that definitively don't and can't work (because physics) and yet they also get good reviews all the time. The placebo can be strong. So reviews are worthless.

As mentioned at the top, I did get some Grove Bags recently that I'll be putting to the test. Just because I don't understand it doesnt mean it doesn't work after all, so I'll try. But I'm not expecting much.

I'm going to do a three way test. Grove Bags versus Mason Jar versus Mylar Bag. All three will be 60% before they get sealed and and then no burping. The mylar bags are pictured below. It should be interesting.
Capture+_2022-10-23-15-28-25~2.png

Thoughts?
 

PURPLEB3RRYKUSH

Well-Known Member
What am I missing when it comes to Grove Bags?

I will quickly say that I've never used them, but I did recently buy some that will be putting to the test in a few weeks.

Anyways, it seems the big marketing claims that eveyone is talking about on the forums and such is the fact that they don't need to be burped because of their patented "Terploc" technology that regulates the humidity and oxygen blah blah.

But this is where they've already lost me.

The whole point of burping was, to me, because nobody has moisture probes, we needed to slow the dry down for the last few percent to avoid overdrying and get a more even moisture distribution. Because it would be hard to go straight to that 60% required in one go without a perfect slow dry and the use of moisture probes. So we dry to say under 70% and then jar it with a cheap atmospheric humidity decector inside, burping until we slowy get to 60%.

Ummm, so how is that any different to Grove Bags?

The buds need to be at 60% moisture in order to seal the Grove Bags in the first place...so yeah obviously Grove Bags dont need to be burped. But then of course you'll need moisture probes to be able to determine that moisture content. But nobody has them, right? Right. So as Grove says on their website, "if you think the cannabis is too wet still burp it in the bag for 3-4 days" and then seal the bag.
View attachment 5216412

So they DO need to be burped exactly the same as a mason jar unless you've got the moisture probes! But if you've got the moisture probes, then why couldn't I just dry them to 60% and go straight to the mason jars...and like magic I've invented "burp-less mason jars with patented TerpKeep technology" according to Grove Bags logic.

So yeah the whole "doesn't need to be burped" thing is completely wrong it seems. And there goes one of the reasons, if not the only major reason (for me), to use them.

They claim that their TerpLoc technology creates "The perfect cannabis environment" because of the following properties: Durability, Odour, Oxygen, Anti-Static, Humidity, UV.
View attachment 5216413

Well, that all seems like crap marketing to me as well.
Durability: okay, jars are durable. I'm usuing the same jars I was 10 years ago...no way I could be using these in ten years. So yeah, real durable.
Odour: right well if its sealed then its sealed isnt it and the smell wont get out. I can't smell my buds when they're in a jar either.
Anti-Static: I never had a problem with static and it really wouldn't be a big deal anyways.
Humidity: again, if its sealed then its sealed...so it will maintain the humidity the same as a jar.
UV: this is just irrelevant since I don't think anyone stores their weed in the sun. A jar in the dark will be the same as the bags.
And lastly Oxygen: this is the only one that MIGHT have some merit. But really how much of a problem will oxygen degredation be for the general grower? Maybe if you were storing your weed for years...but a few months aint going to do shit either way.

And then you see shit like the slider comparsion picture they have on their website showing how weed ages in a Grove Bag compared to a regular bag. Even that is low effort marketing bs. I mean, its just the exact same photo that they've opened in photoshop multiple times and made it darker. If it actually worked like that then why not actually do the experiment and take actual photos. Or if you're going to fake it why not move the bag around between shots so it doesn't clearly look like the same picture...making them just seem dishonest.
View attachment 5216415
View attachment 5216414

So yeah I dont know what I'm missing about the Grove Bags, but it all just seems like marketing BS to me. The copious good reviews mean nothing when theres a million and one other products out there that definitively don't and can't work (because physics) and yet they also get good reviews all the time. The placebo can be strong. So reviews are worthless.

As mentioned at the top, I did get some Grove Bags recently that I'll be putting to the test. Just because I don't understand it doesnt mean it doesn't work after all, so I'll try. But I'm not expecting much.

I'm going to do a three way test. Grove Bags versus Mason Jar versus Mylar Bag. All three will be 60% before they get sealed and and then no burping. The mylar bags are pictured below. It should be interesting.
View attachment 5216416

Thoughts?
They work but jars are better to look at
 

GangaDownUnder

Well-Known Member
They work but jars are better to look at
They're just a sealed bag, like a mason jar or a mylar bag, so yeah of course they will work.

But how are they better? And if they work just as well as a jar but not better, then why would I buy plastic throwaway bags every few months that will end up in landfill when I could just use the same jars I've had forever?

And like I said most people seem to be going on about the fact they dont need to be burped which just isnt the case at all.
 

Tolerance Break

Well-Known Member
They're just a sealed bag, like a mason jar or a mylar bag, so yeah of course they will work.

But how are they better? And if they work just as well as a jar but not better, then why would I buy plastic throwaway bags every few months that will end up in landfill when I could just use the same jars I've had forever?

And like I said most people seem to be going on about the fact they dont need to be burped which just isnt the case at all.
Its an industrial plastic that allows gas exchange. The company that manufactured the material was north of Kansas City, but they recently moved to Oklahoma due to demand.

They're cheap. Do your own experiment if you don't believe the hype.
 

GangaDownUnder

Well-Known Member
Its an industrial plastic that allows gas exchange. The company that manufactured the material was north of Kansas City, but they recently moved to Oklahoma due to demand.

They're cheap. Do your own experiment if you don't believe the hype.
Yep. Did you read what I wrote at all? I have already bought them.

And what does the gas exchange have to do with not having to burp them? Nothing. As I said, maube they dont degrade as fast but who is storing their weed that long anyway?
 

GangaDownUnder

Well-Known Member
Your concept of curing is fundamentally flawed. Buds don't need to be wet to cure properly. "Burping" is not necessary.
What? When did I say burping is part of the curing process? I know its not necessary. I say that in the original post. The question is why is there such hype around not having to burp them when you DO have to burp them if used in the same way as jars (ie. without a moiture meter (not a humidy meter).
 

PJ Diaz

Well-Known Member
What? When did I say burping is part of the curing process? I know its not necessary. I say that in the original post. The question is why is there such hype around not having to burp them when you DO have to burp them if used in the same way as jars (ie. without a moiture meter (not a humidy meter).
You typed a lot of things and are kind of all over the place; not succinct. This made it sounds like you want to jar wet, and burp to 60% rh:

"The whole point of burping was, to me, because nobody has moisture probes, we needed to slow the dry down for the last few percent to avoid overdrying and get a more even moisture distribution. Because it would be hard to go straight to that 60% required in one go without a perfect slow dry and the use of moisture probes. So we dry to say under 70% and then jar it with a cheap atmospheric humidity decector inside, burping until we slowy get to 60%."
 

GangaDownUnder

Well-Known Member
Thats a quote about burping and drying, hence the use of the word "dry" and "overdrying" and "burping", and no uses of the word "cure" or "curing".

So following what I originally said as you quoted, once you're at 60% then it goes into the jar/grove bag and is sealed to begin the cure. How is that hard to understand? And how is that me fundamentally misunderstanding the curing process?
 
Last edited:

Rurumo

Well-Known Member
I don't understand the need for this post, you said you've never tried them....so... try them if you are interested. I've given extra bags to a few of my friends and everyone who tries them seems to love them. It's not that they save a lot of time-they don't really-the reason people like them is because the end result speaks for itself. It's basically the easiest change you can make, once you are already drying correctly, to instantly improve your finished buds.
 

bk78

Well-Known Member
They are just another part of the Youtube generation...trying to buy your way to success is much easier than actually learning skills. The best weed I ever smoked was in the 90's...no stupid cannabis bags back then...I wonder how they did it?? I'm with you..it's just more hype
They are storage bags. Not sure what skills you are talking about that’s needed to store cannabis…… crusty
 

Billy the Mountain

Well-Known Member
I'd definitely buy them if they were available locally. I've never had a jar that was smell proof, I've tried all types of different jars. Mylar bags are good, but I still prefer using a Boveda or Integra pack with them. Plus jars are clunky, take a lot of space and make loud noises.
Mason jars with a proper gasket top are 100% airtight

* If not, the whole canning process for which they were designed, would be impossible.
 
Top