Canada’s premiers discuss delaying the legalization of marijuana

gb123

Well-Known Member
This is some funny stuff actually.


EDMONTON—It’s time to take a deep breath and put pot on the back burner for an extra year, says Manitoba Premier Brian Pallister.

He’s trying to persuade his provincial and territorial counterparts at their annual conference to ask Prime Minister Justin Trudeau to delay the legalization of cannabis 12 months to July 1, 2019.

That would increase the chances of avoiding the “hodge-podge” of different provincial ages of majority and regulations now seen with beer, wine and spirits, Pallister said Tuesday.

“I would hope we could learn from that and not re-create that for cannabis,” he added, acknowledging age of majority and regulations such as where pot will be sold are under provincial jurisdiction.

Pallister also raised concerns about public and traffic safety, health impacts and more, including ways of measuring cannabis impairment for drivers.

Article Continued Below
“There are too many unanswered questions, too many issues that have not been addressed for us to rush into what is an historic change.”

Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall said his province is working toward the deadline of Canada Day next year but wouldn’t mind an extension because there are “a lot of moving parts” in legalizing cannabis.

“Could we have greater continuity in this? It would be desirable but hard to pull off in a short period of time,” Wall told reporters.
“We don’t have continuity….in terms of liquor laws obviously every province is a different place. Just consider the age piece.”

Nova Scotia Premier Stephen McNeil said the small size of the Maritime provinces makes it important for them to be on the same page, although his administration believes it can meet the July 1 deadline next year.

“In Atlantic Canada, there needs to be a uniform age, there needs to be uniform regulations across our respective provinces. I believe that could potentially lead to, perhaps, across the country.”

McNeil said 19 “makes sense” as the age of majority for buying marijuana — the same age his province has set for alcohol.

Ontario isn’t counting on an extension as it conducts public consultations on cannabis in advance of next July’s deadline.

But Premier Kathleen Wynne admitted work is still being done to develop policies on public and traffic safety and protecting the health of youth with legalized cannabis — along with where it will be sold.

“Those questions have not been answered. That’s the work that we have to do now in conjunction with the federal government.”

Speaking for Quebec, Premier Philippe Couillard said a delay would be “fine” but he isn’t expecting one.

“We’ve heard the prime minister say he was very firm on July 1… so we’re working under the assumption that this will be the date. A lot of work needs to be done.”

Pallister said some of that work involves stronger campaigns to make driving under the influence of cannabis as socially unacceptable as drinking and driving has become.

“Attitudes have to change. Attitudes take time to change and it takes a strong, focused campaign for young people to help them understand the dangers. And not exclusively young people,” he added.

“I don’t think it has been properly or fully addressed.”
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
hahahahahaha

Buddy said
“There are too many unanswered questions, too many issues that have not been addressed for us to rush into what is an historic change.”

Ya...well we know the answer....shoulda tried asking and including us...instead of running blindly and greedily toward the gold and cash.
There were experts to ask.....us.
We already know how the little legalization scheme is gonna go....BADLY...lol. Go back to your beer buddy politician...we'll handle the weed like we always have.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
the idiots will let them sell it online.. lol
REGARDLESS of what each province has decided.
Its gonna be a shit fest to see who gets more LPs in their province LMAOROTFF...which will fall .......
They'll be stuck holding bags O Shwags hahahahahaha My god..what a crappy thought that is eh?!?! It will be their First lesson.:wink:
 

VIANARCHRIS

Well-Known Member
Here's an idea for Brian Pallister; if he feels the 'hodge podge' of ages of majority for booze in different provinces is a problem, perhaps he should be talking to the premiers about fixing that rather than worrying about cannabis. I'm not sure about you, but having a year difference in the age of majority from one province to the next has never been an issue for me.
Read my lips...cannabis will be legal July 1, 2018...some provinces will do well, looks like Alberta and Manitoba are going to be a joke.
 

TheRealDman

Well-Known Member
The provinces can't stop this train! They can bitch and moan all they want....not gonna stop shit. 2019 is Fed election. JT needs MJ legalization to pass in 2018 to stick that feather in his re-election cap.
 

gb123

Well-Known Member
he wont (:
but that's OK in my world... pro two seems all that much worse when it comes to bunk charges ....
legal ??? lol its not legal when you put people in jail for using the same stuff our government produces,,,???
lmao how's that legal?
start or not. its worth shit what they are proposing.

(:
 

kDude

Well-Known Member
just find this comical.. the stigma that pot smokers are the ones who are lazy procrastinators
..we'd have this thing nailed out in a month or two (and not a half-assed measure, but a simple sensible legalization that's fair -or as fair as they'd let us make it)

they always pay so much for "industry experts" to help in other areas.. so... o_O
but no, can't hire people who know and've grown this plant for decades.. our experts will be from the other side of the backwards law who've been chasing them down, and medical professionals instead.
you know; ones with zero first-hand experience with the actual plant or product.
 

kDude

Well-Known Member
Ummmm, our government isn't conservative. The NDP is in charge provincially, unfortunately.
just cause you (finally) elected another party doesn't mean most aren't backwards thinking servs still.
why does alberta hate her so much though? *i assume you're from alberta, as it's the only prairie province without conservative leadership.

the impression i get (seeing many coming home to BC) is oil lost ground, so your province is not doing as well.. and y'all blame the NDP for that.. when it really wouldn't matter who was in control.
just like Steven Harper single-handedly kept us out of the recession, as conservatives liked us to believe (no, y'alls oil/oil prices did)
 

ThcGuy

Well-Known Member
just cause you (finally) elected another party doesn't mean most aren't backwards thinking servs still.
why does alberta hate her so much though?

the impression i get (seeing many coming home to BC) is oil lost ground, so your province is not doing as well.. and y'all blame the NDP for that.. when it really wouldn't matter who was in control.
just like Steven Harper single-handedly kept us out of the recession, as conservatives liked us to believe (no, y'alls oil/oil prices did)
I haven't worked in Alberta since she was elected, she is chasing away jobs in the private sector at record rates, she passes bills behind closed doors without public consultation. She is also spending vast amounts of money that we don't have on social programs and services that we can't afford at the moment, she refuses to cut ANY gov't sponsored jobs to keep her base voters happy.

Now I work in Saskatchewan (Building log homes not drilling for oil and gas) but when I am there, I see many drilling rigs working and oil towns are booming there again even with lower oil & gas prices. She is brutal for Alberta.
 

thelast1

Well-Known Member
Cons fucking robbed alberta blind long before ndp got here. There should be at least 250 billion dollars in the heritage trust fund that seems to be missing.

Anyways, legalisation is happening. Get over it and stop making spam threads shouting doom and gloom every five minutes.
 

ThcGuy

Well-Known Member
Cons fucking robbed alberta blind long before ndp got here. There should be at least 250 billion dollars in the heritage trust fund that seems to be missing.

Anyways, legalisation is happening. Get over it and stop making spam threads shouting doom and gloom every five minutes.
Spam threads? I have one thread discussing legalization and safety sensitive jobs, one for my grow journal, a couple more asking growing questions and another on climate change for a total of 5 threads, I can guarantee that I have been on RIU for longer than 25 minutes. Do you not know the difference between a post and a thread?

Also as far as "get over it", I follow politics quite closely as I feel all Canadians should do regardless of who they support and I will not quietly sit in the shadows and allow my provincial government to do whatever it wants without voicing my concerns. I'm sorry if my opinions offend your delicate feelings but it's my rights as a Canadian and I will continue to do so whenever I feel the urge to do so.
 

cannadan

Well-Known Member
well as long as these premiers are willing to forgo all alcohol revenue in the meantime while .. they stall.
Temporarily re-instate alcohol /cig prohibition until they can solve these "oh so difficult" problems....
maybe faltering revenue streams is what it will take to get this done....
 

thelast1

Well-Known Member
Spam threads? I have one thread discussing legalization and safety sensitive jobs, one for my grow journal, a couple more asking growing questions and another on climate change for a total of 5 threads, I can guarantee that I have been on RIU for longer than 25 minutes. Do you not know the difference between a post and a thread?

Also as far as "get over it", I follow politics quite closely as I feel all Canadians should do regardless of who they support and I will not quietly sit in the shadows and allow my provincial government to do whatever it wants without voicing my concerns. I'm sorry if my opinions offend your delicate feelings but it's my rights as a Canadian and I will continue to do so whenever I feel the urge to do so.
Allow me to clarify the confusion.

While my first statement is in reference to your post, it wasn't directed at you personally.

My second statement is in reference to this thread and this poster.

I have no feelings towards you or your opinions.
 

thelast1

Well-Known Member
I just can not see it being avoided.

There's too much money invested and connected players involved.

Going back on it guarantees not being elected again.

If the feds mandate it, I don't think there's much the provinces can legally do to stop it.
 

The Hippy

Well-Known Member
I just can not see it being avoided.

There's too much money invested and connected players involved.

Going back on it guarantees not being elected again.

If the feds mandate it, I don't think there's much the provinces can legally do to stop it.
Pffft.....lol....duffus
 
Top