Bottled Water Contaminated

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
Bottled Water Impure, Too, Study Finds


By JEFF DONN
, AP
posted: 4 HOURS 4 MINUTES AGO




(Oct. 15) - Tests on leading brands of bottled water turned up a variety of contaminants often found in tap water, according to a study released Wednesday by an environmental advocacy group.
The findings challenge the popular impression — and marketing pitch — that bottled water is purer than tap water, the researchers say.


However, all the brands met federal health standards for drinking water. Two violated a California state standard, the study said.
An industry group branded the findings "alarmist." Joe Doss, president of the International Bottled Water Association, said the study is based on the faulty premise that a contaminant is a health concern "even if it does not exceed the established regulatory limit or no standard has been set."


The study's lab tests on 10 brands of bottled water detected 38 chemicals including bacteria, caffeine, the pain reliever acetaminophen, fertilizer, solvents, plastic-making chemicals and the radioactive element strontium. Though some probably came from tap water that some companies use for their bottled water, other contaminants probably leached from plastic bottles, the researchers said.


"In some cases, it appears bottled water is no less polluted than tap water and, at 1,900 times the cost, consumers should expect better," said Jane Houlihan, an environmental engineer who co-authored the study.


The two-year study was done by the Washington-based Environmental Working Group, an organization founded by scientists that advocates stricter regulation. It found the contaminants in bottled water purchased in nine states and Washington, D.C.


Researchers tested one batch for each of 10 brands. Eight did not have contaminants high enough to warrant further testing. But two brands did, so more tests were done and those revealed chlorine byproducts above California's standard, the group reported. The researchers identified those two brands as Sam's Choice sold by Wal-Mart and Acadia of Giant Food supermarkets.


In the Wal-Mart and Giant Food bottled water, the highest concentration of chlorine byproducts, known as trihalomethanes, was over 35 parts per billion. California's limit is 10 parts per billion or less, and the industry's International Bottled Water Association makes 10 its voluntary guideline. The federal limit is 80.


Wal-Mart said its own studies did not turn up illegal levels of contaminants. Giant Food officials released a statement asserting that Acadia meets all regulatory standards. Acadia is sold in the mid-Atlantic states, so it isn't held to California's standard. In most places, bottled water must meet roughly the same federal standards as tap water.
The researchers also said the Wal-Mart brand was five times California's limit for one particular chlorine byproduct, bromodichloromethane. The environmental group wants Wal-Mart to label its bottles in California with a warning because the chlorine-based contaminants have been linked with cancer. It has filed a notice of intent to sue.


Wal-Mart spokeswoman Shannon Frederick said the company was "puzzled" by the findings because testing by suppliers and another lab had detected no "reportable amounts" of such contaminants. She said Wal-Mart would investigate further but defended the quality of its bottled water.


The researchers recommend that people worried about water contaminants drink tap water with a carbon filter.
Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, doesn't it?

Or maybe it makes those that drink bottled water feel like morons for citing its "purity".
 

ccodiane

New Member
Makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, doesn't it?

Or maybe it makes those that drink bottled water feel like morons for citing its "purity".
The biggest joke/scam is the weight of the stuff. These healthies, not that there's anything wrong with that, that stick to bottled water only are in many cases the big anti-oil global warming latte fawning crowd.

To ship water around the world, which as we all know is relatively heavy, uses lots and lots and lots of dirty fuel. *cough cough*
 

Dfunk

Well-Known Member
The great water scam is finally exposed...I wonder what they'll think of next???
 

natrone23

Well-Known Member
i thought I had seen it all until I saw oxygen bars, people paying for air.........fucking amazing:wall:
 

natrone23

Well-Known Member
It should be noted that when inhaling normal air (21% oxygen), a healthy human body will, on average, exhale 14% oxygen, absorbing only 5% of the inhaled oxygen. Thus, it is unclear that increasing the oxygen concentration during inhalation will result in any more oxygen being absorbed than normally is.

:wall::wall:
 

Bongulator

Well-Known Member
Normal air is only 21% oxygen in some areas now. Some major urban centers are down to 13% or 14%. Pretty incredible if you think about that, how quickly we've brought down the oxygen levels near some major urban areas, and in such a short period of time. I wonder how low it can go before people just start falling over dead. I guess they probably already are, in the form of heart attacks and the like.
 

Dfunk

Well-Known Member
Quick everybody get your oxygen! On another note dosen't excessive oxygen inhaled get you high(not like weed)?
 

TheBrutalTruth

Well-Known Member
u kno bush has wanted to dump sulfer in the stratisphere and dont sulfer eat oxy
There's always some nut jobs proposing to dump some chemical into the oceans, or into the atmosphere.

So it wouldn't surprise me if Bush is wanting to dump Sulfur into the atmosphere, though I can't imagine why. Sulfur, Hydrogen and Oxygen, or Sulfur and Water Vapor would form Acid Rain. So I can't really give that too much credence.

No, the last great dumping plan I heard of was dumping Carbonate into the oceans after pumping it full of CO2, or something like that.

Then there was using some kind of metal to control storms, or something like that. Chopped up aluminum, or chopped up magnesium or something. I don't know, but there were experiments with it in the SW to try strengthening storms and getting more rain.

Weird stuff.
 

******

Well-Known Member
There's always some nut jobs proposing to dump some chemical into the oceans, or into the atmosphere.

So it wouldn't surprise me if Bush is wanting to dump Sulfur into the atmosphere, though I can't imagine why. Sulfur, Hydrogen and Oxygen, or Sulfur and Water Vapor would form Acid Rain. So I can't really give that too much credence.

No, the last great dumping plan I heard of was dumping Carbonate into the oceans after pumping it full of CO2, or something like that.

Then there was using some kind of metal to control storms, or something like that. Chopped up aluminum, or chopped up magnesium or something. I don't know, but there were experiments with it in the SW to try strengthening storms and getting more rain.

Weird stuff.
his star wars genius u know the 80s reagan , say volcanos cool the planet so sulfur must b y
 
Top