Circular logic much?
Anyway check out the super fishy story of Saul's/Paul's conversion. The unknown author of Luke is borrowing from the OT to create a narrative.
Acts 9:3-8
"3 Now as he was going along and approaching Damascus, suddenly a light from heaven flashed around him. 4 He fell to...
Put the later Gospel narratives to the side for a moment. Now would it make more sense that "killed for being human", and "would not kill if God's plan was made known" when applied to the vision in Zechariah? Here a Joshua/Jesus (Savior) is in dirty clothes (seen as a metaphor for mortal flesh...
Why is the sky blue? The Old Testament infers the answer 1,000s of years before modern science. Praise the Lord!
Genesis (NRSV)
1:6a "And God said, “Let there be a dome in the midst of the waters,"
1:6b "let it separate the waters from the waters."
1:7 "So God made the dome and separated...
Even the money changers do not make sense in context of being killed for looking like a human, and would not be killed if they knew it was a gift for mankind of eternal life.
Doesn't it make sense that the answer is Satan without pulling in later Gospel narratives?
This is what you said in a previous post "There was a dude named jesus, he was a kind, wise and passionate man that was wronged by his fellow man.". You don't want to be challenged that's fine with me, but you should run lip in safer waters.
That was not part of the choices. But if you mean Jews then why would they kill someone for looking human? Why would they be against God's salvitic gift? Your logic does not follow.
I clarified the questions, and doubled the translations if you want to give it another try.
In the context of...
How about you. Can you answer two simple multiple choice questions in context of Paul the Apostle that logically follows?
1) Who would most likely kill Jesus just for looking like, and believed to be just a human (Phili. 2:7 "but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human...
So you can't answer two simple questions.
Can anyone else answer two simple multiple choice questions in context of Paul the Apostle that logically follows?
1) Who would most likely kill Jesus just for looking like, and believed to be just a human (Phili. 2:7 "but emptied himself, taking the...
Then can you answer two simple multiple choice questions in context of Paul the Apostle that logically follows?
1) Who would most likely kill Jesus just for looking like, and believed to be just a human (Phili. 2:7 "but emptied himself, taking the form of a slave, being born in human likeness...
We are all prone to the Holy Dopamine Gost via Placebo Faith. The evolution that increased our cognition still has remnants of the things that preexisted it. The ancient Theists/Philosophers thought that the *FEELS* was contact with a divine presence/knowledge. Just study the neurology of...
Additional information for the Gospels/Acts:
The anonymous author of Mark hints to the reader that it's entirely a parable in which the meaning is an inside secret (Mar 4:10-12) while referencing Isa. 6:9-10. This echoes Romans 11:7-12 (Deut. 29:4 & Psa. 69:22-23), :25-27 (Isa. 59:20, 27:9a)...
Three reasons why one (not relying on faith) should be agnostic about the claim "Jesus certainly existed".
1) The Gospels/Acts are overflowing with signs of literary fabrication.
"Those who want to find a historical record in Mark face an even greater obstacle than the ambiguous evidence for...