Search results

  1. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    I'm saying that rules could be created so lp's are the only dg's allowed. They could do it because they have to allow homegrows and could disguise it as an alternative source for approved meds. They have to create new rules, of course lp's will be part of that. I'm purely speculating how the...
  2. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    If they have to wait and go under, I'm fine with that. It really won't change anything for me. I do remember the Harpco days and their majority though, and how quickly things changed and laws were passed. A legal rec market in Canada is estimated to be in the billions per year, add on...
  3. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    Not for those who choose a dg, it won't. By allowing home grows they allow access, by providing lp's as dg's they provide alternate sources. I'm not saying it's good for people who need dg's, just speculating how they could create rules to support their buddies while rec is worked out and they...
  4. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    I don't think it will be too far off now. They need the new stream of tax revenues badly to offset spending. Their buddies need to protect their investments and crop out in a rec market or lose it all. I don't think rec will be too far off now.
  5. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    I agree. That's why I believe all lp's will be throwing loads of cash at the rec lobby. Even guaranteeing dg grows won't be enough for lp's so they need rec to keep the lights on. This decision has completely wiped the board clean and there is too much at stake to prolong legalization. Too...
  6. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    It's my assumption because people will be allowed to grow their own so access is there. The hitch is keeping lp's satisfied during the forced changes and decreased revenue. There will be some who go under because of this. I'm speculating, but it's easy to assume new dg rules could force people...
  7. ricky1lung

    injunction/court case updates

    They could rewrite dg rules so only lp type facilities are able to produce meds for patients as a dg. Watch for it, that's the only way they can keep lp's happy until rec is legal. I bet the rec lobby just got louder and is having cash tossed at it from every direction now so there is a quick...
  8. ricky1lung

    Federal Court ruling celebrated by medical pot users who grow their own

    I understand that. So Let's all celebrate the good news. :)
  9. ricky1lung

    Federal Court ruling celebrated by medical pot users who grow their own

    They can't stop it. That's what this ruling does. This ruling has major implications for mj as a whole. The Harper gov tried, and failed to have grow rights removed. They tried, and failed to institute a new system to prohibit grows. This ruling will force grow rights for everyone, even for...
  10. ricky1lung

    Federal Court ruling celebrated by medical pot users who grow their own

    Right, but now comes discrimination against mmpr folks, so it's a win. The gov has 6 months to ensure the right to grow and other patients are not discriminated against. It's a win, for everyone. Congrats to all patients.
  11. ricky1lung

    Federal Court ruling celebrated by medical pot users who grow their own

    Are you questioning or complaining about the ruling and the right to grow med cannabis? You'd think people would celebrate.
  12. ricky1lung

    Federal Court ruling celebrated by medical pot users who grow their own

    VANCOUVER -- Medical marijuana users who grow their own plants breathed a sigh of relief Wednesday as the Federal Court ruled it was unconstitutional to prevent them from doing so. Vancouver resident Sita von Windheim, who grows her own medical marijuana, reckons she would be out about $80,000...
  13. ricky1lung

    Has anyone considered a boycott?

    Shhhh People are gonna cry that crimanals who sell illegal product took a hit to their business models. Some people don't like legal weed or legal investments. Fucking hippies, GarbageMen and losers like gcrackheads. Lmao
  14. ricky1lung

    Should APPLE be forced to unlock San Bernardino terrorist iphone

    As of recently, many laws have been circumvented to allow the spying of citizens or the collection of data to be shared by friendly participants of the spying. So yeah, keep telling me they can't do it, they haven't done it, nor any of their "friends" haven't. Like fuck, take a look and you...
  15. ricky1lung

    Should APPLE be forced to unlock San Bernardino terrorist iphone

    What do contractors pay my friend? That's a simple example of how wrong you are. We could go further into secret programs ran by the gov ( like the data collection that has already happened ) Or You can admit you haven't got a clue wtf you're talking about. Another option for you is another...
  16. ricky1lung

    Should APPLE be forced to unlock San Bernardino terrorist iphone

    You're completely wrong. They hire those who can do what they need done. Squeaky clean means nothing. Capabilities are everything.
  17. ricky1lung

    Should APPLE be forced to unlock San Bernardino terrorist iphone

    Who do you think works for the Feds? They hire gamers to fly drones, who do they hire to hack the shit out of everyone :) If you actually knew what happens you'd know I'm not all over the place by suggesting some people don't visit the right places to know that they can already be hacked.
  18. ricky1lung

    Should APPLE be forced to unlock San Bernardino terrorist iphone

    The US gov has been building secrect facilities to hack, collect, store and use data from across the planet, and you believe they cannot access a device from a well known willing participant in the espionage game like apple? Yes please, turn on iMessage so all data not only flows through gov...
Top