DOMA ruling is a start.

[kpmarine]

makes me wonder what kind of repressed individual would so adamantly keep stating something like that, as red so often does.

It's just so logically unsound that I don't see how it's a maintainable position. It's like the "Marriage is for procreation." argument in that respect. Being raised in a very Christian household; I heard both arguments a lot. As a kid, once I actually applied some logic to those arguments they quickly ceased to make sense.

 

[Padawanbater2]

I don't care if they call me a bigot. The fact is that animals and children cannot consent; no matter how much someone insists otherwise. Until animals and children become capable of entering into a contract of their own free will it's apples to oranges in respect to same-sex marriage. Fucking an animal is animal cruelty, and fucking a child is child abuse; fucking another consenting adult is nothing like those. Apparently I'm missing your point, what is wrong with my logic here?

As far as having to accept another groups way of life; welcome to living in what's supposed to be a country with equal rights. If it's not harming someone or something else, then you should accept it. You don't have to like it though.

Watching him put that together was like witnessing a kid try to put a square peg through a circle hole..

 

[Red1966]

Ah, so you mean they could get married, just only to someone of the opposite sex?

Yes, just like people who aren't gay. And most do. And have children.

 

[Red1966]

you got it! it's red logic. red also believes that women could always vote as long as they were men, and black people never had to be slaves as long as they were white. he works with nobel prize winners, there is no arguing with his supreme logic.

You never argue with what I say, anyway. You make up shit I never said and argue that. Like the above statements.

 

[tokeprep]

Yes, just like people who aren't gay. And most do. And have children.

And why should this ability to marry people of the opposite sex be sufficient?

 

[kpmarine]

Yes, just like people who aren't gay. And most do. And have children.

I don't think you're being as clear as you could be. Are you trying to state that gays already had the same rights as straights? Specifically, due to the fact that a man could marry a woman he is not in love with instead of the man he loves? Are you further trying to imply that all gay people are really just straight with your statement? Because I honestly don't see what you were getting at otherwise. Feel free to explain if I misunderstand you though.

 

[echelon1k1]

I'm sorry are we talking civil unions or a marriage ceremony in a church?

 

[kpmarine]

I'm sorry are we talking civil unions or a marriage ceremony in a church?

In this country "marriage" isn't just a religious term. A marital coupling here is something that carries benefits outside of the church.

 

[cannabineer]

It may not be the very next step but its in line waiting so tell me would you be against it? How do you feel about interspecies sex?

Like kpmarine, i am fascinated. Lay the logic of this out for me. cn

 

[cannabineer]

It can wait in line all it wants. Animals can't consent so it's a non-issue. Personally, I feel that shit is pretty wrong. I'm sure there's some nut out there that thinks his sheep loves him though.

She's just pulling the wool over his eyes. cn

 

[kpmarine]

Like kpmarine, i am fascinated. Lay the logic of this out for me. cn

I suppose a wrench exists in my argument. Some bears can consent.

 

[kpmarine]

She's just pulling the wool over his eyes. cn

I was thinking the opposite.

 

[cannabineer]

I was thinking the opposite.

Of wool ... or of eyes? cn

 

[kpmarine]

Of wool ... or of eyes? cn

Haha, it seems the picture did not show.

 

[cannabineer]

That's what ewe say! cn

 

[kpmarine]

That's what ewe say! cn

I'm just lambpooning those that love sheep.

 

[BigNBushy]

First, with regard to animal secks, if were allowed to slaughter an animal and eat its meat, then one ought to be able to bust his nut in his horses horse puss. I don't get down like that, but we have dominion over animals in all things. Second, this thread perfectly demonstrates that anyone who applies a standard to their life falls on the side of not being able to find any reason to oppose same sex marriage. I am not a liberal, it is my conservative principals that lead me to this personal belief. This argument espoused most recently in this thread that "Gays have the same rights as straight people because they can still marry someone from the opposite sex" is amusing.

 

[UncleBuck]

You never argue with what I say, anyway. You make up shit I never said and argue that. Like the above statements.

you say gays have equal marriage rights because they can marry someone of the opposite sex.

by the exact same logic, blacks were never slaves as long as they were white and women could always vote as long as they are men.

it's not my fault that you're crippled with ignorance and bad logic.

 

[kpmarine]

First, with regard to animal secks, if were allowed to slaughter an animal and eat its meat, then one ought to be able to bust his nut in his horses horse puss. I don't get down like that, but we have dominion over animals in all things. Second, this thread perfectly demonstrates that anyone who applies a standard to their life falls on the side of not being able to find any reason to oppose same sex marriage. I am not a liberal, it is my conservative principals that lead me to this personal belief. This argument espoused most recently in this thread that "Gays have the same rights as straight people because they can still marry someone from the opposite sex" is amusing.

Your views on animal fucking are truly concerning.

 

[UncleBuck]

Your views on animal fucking are truly concerning.

the guy concerns me greatly.

he has previously asked me what the problem with racism is, now he wants to know what the problem is with fucking an animal.

to the surprise of no one, he's on the right side of the political spectrum.