#NRAlogic

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
at least four people have been shot by toddlers since last weekend.

where are the armed, law abiding toddlers to stop this?
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You agree to the wrong premise. You started this thread to fling poo at gun owners. cn
not at all.

the direction of the poo is on a clear vector to wayne lapierre and his toadying sychophants.

unless you're supposing that all gun owners must follow the same retarded logic as the guy who makes sure america has the best equipped mass murderers of children anywhere.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
not at all.

the direction of the poo is on a clear vector to wayne lapierre and his toadying sychophants.

unless you're supposing that all gun owners must follow the same retarded logic as the guy who makes sure america has the best equipped mass murderers of children anywhere.
See? There it was in your last clause. You're aiming your hate at the gun, and denying it by use of verbal gymnastics.
For every child murdered in a gunner's spree, how many more have had their lives saved by an armed citizen in the right time and place? You cannot suggest "fewer" because it's immeasurable even as it's a real force in our society. I can suggest "thousands to one" and you can't refute that. They only tabulate the losers, and to the uncritical thinker this creates a clear and present problem. The only arguments "pro" are currently only available by imperfect analogy ... violent crime rates in Australia and the UK after they implemented sweeping firearm restriction and confiscation. But the antis look only at violence that was performed with a gun. At first glance one is inclined to nod and say "yeah", but the dishonesty in how the stats are prepared and presented requires a bit more analysis. cn
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
See? There it was in your last clause. You're aiming your hate at the gun, and denying it by use of verbal gymnastics.
For every child murdered in a gunner's spree, how many more have had their lives saved by an armed citizen in the right time and place? You cannot suggest "fewer" because it's immeasurable even as it's a real force in our society. I can suggest "thousands to one" and you can't refute that. They only tabulate the losers, and to the uncritical thinker this creates a clear and present problem. The only arguments "pro" are currently only available by imperfect analogy ... violent crime rates in Australia and the UK after they implemented sweeping firearm restriction and confiscation. But the antis look only at violence that was performed with a gun. At first glance one is inclined to nod and say "yeah", but the dishonesty in how the stats are prepared and presented requires a bit more analysis. cn
woah now, bear.

this is the NRA logic thread, let's keep it at NRA level.

for example, people get killed by drunk drivers, so everyone should be able to drive drunk legally.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
also-

it has come to light buck has a stake in this fight. he was abused by his gun owning white father. who was also claiming to be Christian.
 

Murfy

Well-Known Member
or take all cars away?-

what are the chances you were touched where you pee by a car too? amazing.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
also-

it has come to light buck has a stake in this fight. he was abused by his gun owning white father. who was also claiming to be Christian.
christian pedophiles?

that's downright logical. remind me again which zombie you worship? was it the christ one?

:lol:

too easy, muffy.
 

cannabineer

Ursus marijanus
woah now, bear.

this is the NRA logic thread, let's keep it at NRA level.

for example, people get killed by drunk drivers, so everyone should be able to drive drunk legally.
You want NRA-style logic but with the premise inverted? Consider the term "assault weapon". Seriously, is there any such thing as a NONassault weapon?

Or, the premise that fewer guns = less crime. That one does not stand even the most sloppy scrutiny.

Finally, ... it's for the children. cn
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You want NRA-style logic but with the premise inverted? Consider the term "assault weapon". Seriously, is there any such thing as a NONassault weapon?

Or, the premise that fewer guns = less crime. That one does not stand even the most sloppy scrutiny.

Finally, ... it's for the children. cn
considering that several children survived newtown because lanza had to change magazines, what do you say about the NRA's opposition to limiting high capacity mags?

http://articles.courant.com/2012-12-23/news/hc-lanza-gunjam-20121222_1_rifle-school-psychologist-classroom

no one cares about your semantic bickering, i would make an alternative choice about your battles.
 

bhandari1

Active Member
I gave a gun to my pot plants for protection when I'm not home...they know to shoot the cat if she breaks into the area!!
 
Top