Vote Ron Paul 2012

C

ChesusRice

Well-Known Member
Mellowman2112 said:
In reference to your post: If the jews are in control of our country it is not racism to call them out on it. 6 Jews control 90% of the media in this country. No wonder congress cowtows to the JEwish prime minister when he comes for a visit. No wonder we give them billions in arms and money. They control the mainstream media. This should be illegal. No wonder nobody watches the news anymore its total propaganda. The majority owner of the private federal reserve stock is a jew. Rothschild. It's true. Rothschild enslaved us all making serfs of us in 1913 by usurping control of our banking system. Simultaneously having the IRS created to enforce collection of his interest by imposing an income tax. The IRS is the collection arm of the private federal reserve. Wake up dude! We didnt have an income tax before we had the misnamed federal reserve. IT wasnt necessary. His heirs own and control the federal reserve today. Along with the Morgans, the Loebs, the Warburgs and a few other select families.
Click to expand...
Only 3 kinds of Ron Paul Supporters
-stoners
-racists
-anti goverment conspiracy freaks

Mellowman is an example of being all three
 
dtp5150

dtp5150

Well-Known Member
UncleBuck said:
this is a rawn pawl thread. i am posting things rawn pawl has actually stated. i am not attacking anyone, i am giving more info about the candidate.

go talk to gyroscope if you're worried about personal attacks.
Click to expand...
meme's are fucking retarded and will continue to be the downfall of any intellectualism left in this online culture. you cant learn politics or history from a stupid one liner and a shitty graphic, as much as the 4chan/facebook generation would like to believe.

except for the fact he didnt actually state any of those two previous comments. The first was paraphrased incorrectly and is actually a part of legislation brought up by a bunch of officials. Since when do we accuse officials of stating things that are simply things added to the pages and pages of legislation that the officials argue and compromise over for ever. Legislation is a mixture of interests and a compromise between supporters.

The second, not sure if paraphrased incorrectly but definitely taken out of context, but its source was from a newsletter that was not actually written by him, but the newsletter had a ghost author. I know I would say, 5% of the POPULATION has sensible political views.

Marriage is fucking retarded anyway, homosexual or not. What needs to be changed is tax and civil rights laws. Marriage was a religious convention! Why are there so many civil and financial laws tied up with it?!

Imagine if someone was to examine every myspace, twitter, facebook update, journal, facebook photo, political party affiliation, posting of someone for the majority of their life ( imagine being over 50), even those written by other people ( wtf? ) you could make a silly little graphic with incorrectly paraphrased "statements" with false hints of the persons character also.

pseudo-intellectuals, do your homework and spend time researching instead of attempting to act like you know wtf you are talking about on an online forum :D
 
Harrekin

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
dtp5150 said:
meme's are fucking retarded and will continue to be the downfall of any intellectualism left in this online culture. you cant learn politics or history from a stupid one liner and a shitty graphic, as much as the 4chan/facebook generation would like to believe.

except for the fact he didnt actually state any of those two previous comments. The first was paraphrased incorrectly and is actually a part of legislation brought up by a bunch of officials. Since when do we accuse officials of stating things that are simply things added to the pages and pages of legislation that the officials argue and compromise over for ever. Legislation is a mixture of interests and a compromise between supporters.

The second, not sure if paraphrased incorrectly but definitely taken out of context, but its source was from a newsletter that was not actually written by him, but the newsletter had a ghost author. I know I would say, 5% of the POPULATION has sensible political views.

Marriage is fucking retarded anyway, homosexual or not. What needs to be changed is tax and civil rights laws. Marriage was a religious convention! Why are there so many civil and financial laws tied up with it?!

Imagine if someone was to examine every myspace, twitter, facebook update, journal, facebook photo, political party affiliation, posting of someone for the majority of their life ( imagine being over 50), even those written by other people ( wtf? ) you could make a silly little graphic with incorrectly paraphrased "statements" with false hints of the persons character also.

pseudo-intellectuals, do your homework and spend time researching instead of attempting to act like you know wtf you are talking about on an online forum :D
Click to expand...
Why you mad bro?
 
P

Parker

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
Only 3 kinds of Ron Paul Supporters
-stoners
-racists
-anti goverment conspiracy freaks

Mellowman is an example of being all three
Click to expand...
Only 3 kinds of non Ron Paul Supporters
-uninformed teenagers who copy and paste articles
-racists
-big goverment control freaks

Chesusrice is an example of being all three
 
S

SSHZ

Well-Known Member
ChesusRice said:
1. He wants to repeal the Civil Rights Act. That's the 1964 law that made segregation illegal and outlawed discrimination on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex or national origin. Paul claims it infringes on people's freedom. If a restaurant or hotel wants to ban African-Americans, he believes they should be allowed to. As he put it in a speech to Congress: "the forced integration dictated by the Civil Rights Act of 1964 increased racial tensions while diminishing individual liberty."


2. He's also against the Americans With Disabilities Act. That's the 1990 bill passed by the first President Bush, which followed up the Civil Rights Act by making it illegal to discriminate against someone because of a disability. Paul wants it gone, too.


3. He is against public health care. You know how you think Americans are crazy because they can't do any better on universal health care than the watered down bill Obama got through? Well, President Ron Paul would do much, much worse. He thinks that in an entirely private system, poor people would have all of their needs taken care of by charitable doctors who would be willing to work for free. Ron Paul, by the way, is a medical doctor.


4. He wants to dissolve the public education system. He promises to eliminate the Department of Education entirely and leave the question of whether to offer any public education at all up to local governments. He calls public education "socialist" (which we actually agree with, but he, unlike us, doesn't think that's a good thing) and says, "I preach home schooling and private schooling." According to an interview, "The Department of Education has given us No Child Left Behind, massive unfunded mandates, indoctrination, and in some cases, forced medication of our children with psychotropic drugs. We should get rid of all of that..."


5. He thinks global warming is a hoax. In his words, it's "the greatest hoax, I think, that's been around in many, many years — if not hundreds of years". But that's just the tip of the crazyberg. Ron Paul winning the presidency would be a disaster for the environment. He wants to completely disband the Environmental Protection Agency, abolish environmental regulation, and lift, it seems, just about all the restrictions on drilling for oil. Including in National Parks.


6. He doesn't believe in evolution. When asked about it in 2007, he was pretty clear: "I think it’s a theory. The theory of evolution. And I don’t accept it as a theory."


7. He's against federal safety standards. So that means no federal testing to make sure the products you're sold won't kill you. Or that, say, the airplane you're on won't fall out of the sky. In fact, he's in favour of completely disbanding the Federal Aviation Authority, which does stuff like hire air traffic controllers to make sure planes don't collide in the air. He has argued against the Food and Drug Administration, which makes sure pharmaceuticals are safe to take. ("People weren't dying from bad drugs before we had the FDA," he has said, "I mean, it just didn't happen.") And forget Ralph Nader's successful crusade to enforce the wearing of seat belts. Ron Paul is ideologically opposed to the federal government making sure cars even have seat belts. "I mean, do we need the federal government to tell us whether we buy a safe car?"


8. He is radically pro-life. And vehemently opposed to a woman's right to choose. He signed the "personhood pledge" making the rounds on the current campaign, suggesting that abortion should be legally considered to be the same thing as murder.


9. He wants to do away with all foreign aid. Paul's isolationism sounds good to liberals when he's talking about his refusal to invade other nations. But the United States government, under President Paul, would send no funds to the developing world to help combat AIDS or famines or natural disasters or anything else.


10. He would pull out of the United Nations. He openly claims the United Nations is part of a plot to create one world government. "If we continue down the UN path, America as we know it will cease to exist." And not only does he want to withdraw the U.S. from membership, he wants to evict the United Nations from their headquarters in New York.


11. He's against the minimum wage. Instead of making sure that people are paid at least a minimum amount for their work, he believes companies should be allowed to pay whatever ever they like, with the law of supply and demand determining just how little. Lower wages, he argues, would actually help poor people by creating more jobs.


12. He is a gun nut. Our eyebrows are already raised by anyone who claims that having firearms is a "God-given right", like Ron Paul does. But he doesn't stop there. He wants to repeal the legislation that requires a background check when you buy a new gun — you know, to make sure you're not, say, a fugitive from justice, a violent offender, or currently stalking someone. Back when there actually was a ban an assault weapons, he was, of course, against the ban. And now that there isn't, he wants to make sure Obama doesn't get the chance to bring a new one in.


13. He believes we're waging a war against Christmas. In his words, he claims that "the elitist, secular Left" are waging an "ongoing war against religion" to "transform America into a completely secular nation, a nation that is legally and culturally biased against Christianity." And as if that wasn't crazy enough, he adds, "Christmas itself may soon be a casualty of that war."


14. He wants to get rid of income tax. He is against taxation in general, of course, which most liberals would disagree pretty strongly with. Especially when it comes to the income tax. It's generally recognized as the most direct way to make sure that poor folk don't have to give up more of their earnings than rich folk do. But Paul wants to get rid of it entirely.


15. He voted to build a fence along the border with Mexico. In fact, he's pretty radical when it comes to the whole question of undocumented immigration. He has backed off on the fence issue (because, he says, it might be used to keep Americans in) but he has also argued that Emergency Room doctors shouldn't have to treat immigrants without documentation. And that he wants to end birthright citizenship, which says you're an American citizen if you were born in America, whether or not your parents were citizens themselves.


16. He's against the Occupational Health and Safety Act. That's the law that gives Americans the right to a safe workplace, and makes sure an employer doesn't force employees to work in a dangerous or unhealthy environment. That, Paul figures, is unconstitutional. It limits the employer's freedom to put workers in harm's way.


17. He wants to U.S. to seize control of the Panama Canal. Paul's isolationism doesn't seem to apply to the Panama Canal. The United States signed a treaty back in the 1970s gradually ceding control of the canal to the government of Panama. But Paul wants to overturn that. Because if the U.S doesn't seize control of it, he claims some hostile regime might seize control of it instead.


18. He thinks interstate highways are unconstitutional. You're probably getting the impression by now that Ron Paul thinks that pretty much everything the federal government does is unconstitutional. That's because Ron Paul thinks that pretty much everything the federal government does is unconstitutional. He has even argued against interstate highways, saying Eisenhower knew he was bending the law when he built them. Paul figures they're a violation of states' rights.


19. He seems pretty homophobic to us. Paul actually gets a lot of credit for being the one Republican candidate who isn't homophobic, mostly because he says that the federal government has no business telling people what to do in their private lives and he's come out against a constitutional ban against same-sex marriage. But it's really not that clear where he stands. His reason for being against the ban is that he believes marriage laws should be left up to individual states or to the church. When some states began to pass laws legalizing same-sex marriage, he fought to make sure other states wouldn't have to recognize those marriages as legal. He's also for don't-ask-don't-tell and has voted to de-fund any organization which "presents male or female homosexuality as an acceptable alternative life style or which suggest that it can be an acceptable life style". As for his own personal attitude toward the gay community? Well, an ex-staffer who defended Paul against charges of homophobia did so by claiming he only knew of two times Paul did something homophobic: the time he swatted away a gay man's hand rather than have to shake it, and the time he refused to go to the washroom at the same time as a gay guy.

20. And he seems pretty racist too. Paul has been haunted by accusations of racism pretty much the whole campaign long. And with good reason. He used to publish newsletters, under his own name, which said unbelievably racist things. Things like, "I think we can safely assume that 95 percent of black males in that city are semi-criminal or entirely criminal." And, "If you have ever been robbed by a black teenaged male, you know how unbelievably fleet-footed they can be." For years, he refused opportunities to distance himself from those comments and those newsletters. Now, finally, he has, saying that they were written by other people, without his knowledge, and that he doesn't share those views. But that's not the only thing that makes us worried. More recently, he complained about the Transportation Security Administration hiring visible minorities to do airport screenings. Again, in his own words: "We quadrupled the TSA, you know, and hired more people who look more suspicious to me than most Americans who are getting checked... Most of them are, well, you know, they just don’t look very American to me."
Click to expand...

Jeeze, I see I have more in common with RP than I thought. But why vote for someone who has no chance....... I'll again state that Obama is the worse of 2 evils and that's why Romney will get my lone vote. If I was voting for Obama, I'd say 3 votes- 1 from me, 1 from my dog and the other from my dead father.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top