Red1966
Well-Known Member
No, that wasn't question at all. You have no valid argument so you are trying to misdirect the conversation to something else. The question was whether the "bible thumpers" should be forced to subsidize a practice contrary to their beliefs. You're the one putting them in the equation.the vast majority of cases, nothing is subsidized. the patient pays the insurance company for insurance, sees a doctor, that's it. the question here is whether or not birth control pills should be treated like all other preventive care medicine. although bible thumpers may object, they can fuck off as they don't get to put their religion between a patient and their doctor.