undertheice
Well-Known Member
since fog found the obama vs. paul poll not to his liking, i thought i might put one up that has options aimed more at his sort of philosophy. it's a very limited time offer, so get your choices in now.
Furthermore, check out these concessions that Obama would've made to Beohner, things congressional Democrats have consistently fought against:
- His stimulus bill was half the size that his advisers thought necessary;
- He continued Bushs war and national security policies without change and even retained Bushs defense secretary;
- He put forward a health plan almost identical to those that had been supported by Republicans such as Mitt Romney in the recent past, pointedly rejecting the single-payer option favored by liberals;
- He caved to conservative demands that the Bush tax cuts be extended without getting any quid pro quo whatsoever;
- And in the past few weeks he has supported deficit reductions that go far beyond those offered by Republicans.
And here's the typical progressive response to our pragmatic president's dealmaking:Among the provisions Obama to which Obama had said yes, according to a senior administration official, were the following:
Medicare: Raising the eligibility age, imposing higher premiums for upper income beneficiaries, changing the cost-sharing structure, and shifting Medigap insurance in ways that would likely reduce first-dollar coverage. This was to generate about $250 billion in ten-year savings. This was virtually identical to what Boehner offered.
Medicaid: Significant reductions in the federal contribution along with changes in taxes on providers, resulting in lower spending that would likely curb eligibility or benefits. This was to yield about $110 billion in savings. Boehner had sought more: About $140 billion. But thats the kind of gap ongoing negotiation could close.
Social Security: Changing the formula for calculating cost-of-living increases in order to reduce future payouts. The idea was to close the long-term solvency gap by one-third, although it likely would have taken more than just this one reform to produce enough savings for that.
Discretionary spending: A cut in discretionary spending equal to $1.2 trillion over ten years, some of them coming in fiscal year 2012. The remaining differences here, over the timing of such cuts, were tiny.
really, I could go on and on about how the left has disagreed with Obama over and over, but you'll still call him a socialist so whatever; You may reject this post, but it doesn't make it any less true.established in both Democrats and Republicans minds the thought that Obama was a weak negotiatora pushover. He was more widely seen among Democrats and other close observers as having a strategy of starting near where he thinks the Republicans areat the fifty-yard lineand then moving closer to their position.(source)
You are limiting yourself in your perception. It's not just left/right.Maybe you need a reality check...
First, what are we calling right and left?
You are limiting yourself in your perception. It's not just left/right.Maybe you need a reality check...
First, what are we calling right and left?
my question exactly!You are limiting yourself in your perception. It's not just left/right.
Did Abe Lincoln really say "that is cool"?
I always thought you were one that took the time to consider things before you typed...shortest post I have ever seen you type and with it you go and show how foolish one could be...my suggestion was to put up a poll with all the candidates running to be named, so we can actually get a feel of who the people would vote for, but I think we all know why you people refuse to do that..instead you go and put up a poll using dead people..I guess you wanted to show that yes you can be stupid too....Good job...oh yeah FUCK YOU and your poll...and remember you have to defend my right to tell you suchsince fog found the obama vs. paul poll not to his liking, i thought i might put one up that has options aimed more at his sort of philosophy. it's a very limited time offer, so get your choices in now.
Well to be fair, this is the least productive congress in at least a few generations (that statistic is something along the lines of this congress has gotten less done than any other congress except the the 54th? congress which was about the same).A dead president would most likely do a better job of leading the country. I'm dead serious.
I agree wholly. If Congress was made up of dead people, we would probably have the greatest country in the world again.Well to be fair, this is the least productive congress in at least a few generations (that statistic is something along the lines of this congress has gotten less done than any other congress except the the 54th? congress which was about the same).
Obstructionism is fun!
weren't you the first to tell lefties during the health care debate that we can't use other countries as a point of reference?Default would be the best thing for the economy. Tell the bankers to pound sand. Iceland defaulted, Iceland has one of the quickest growing economies in the world now.
Wasn't me, now you just look like an asshole who can't tell the difference from one poster to the next.weren't you the first to tell lefties during the health care debate that we can't use other countries as a point of reference?
for example, we would bring up some european country and talk about how they insured all of their citizens, not just some, for less than we do. and you'd be quick to tell us we can't make that comparison because america ain't european country x, y or z.
well, i'm happy to throw it right back at ya. america ain't iceland, comparison is unfair, and you are a dullard.