Why Is The Bible So Revered As The "Word of GOD"?

Status
Not open for further replies.

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
Man i was atheist then i dropped acid and i now Believe in the abanable Snow man and the tooth fairy, possibilities are endless now lol. i dont believe in anything i can't touch see or smell like oxygen we can't see or smell it but without it we Die
Ummmm..... Oxygen is a gas. Not only does it have a scent (though i would describe it close to the 'taste' of water), but it CAN be seen (in places) and can even be touched (when brought to a cool enough temperature).

I recommend you put down the acid, and pick up a chemistry book.
 

BrotherBuz

Active Member
It has long been known that the first backboned land animals or "tetrapods" - the ancestors of amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, including ourselves - evolved from a group of fishes about 370 million years ago during the Devonian period. However, even though scientists had discovered fossils of tetrapod-like fishes and fish-like tetrapods from this period, these were still rather different from each other and did not give a complete picture of the intermediate steps in the transition.

In 2006 the situation changed dramatically with the discovery of an almost perfectly intermediate fish-tetrapod, Tiktaalik, but even so a gap remained between this animal and the earliest true tetrapods (animals with limbs rather than paired fins). Now, new fossils of the extremely primitive tetrapod Ventastega from the Devonian of Latvia cast light on this key phase of the transition.

One of the many problems with this is that geologist can prove by way of the Cambrian Column, of fossilized rock, that life had a sudden and abrupt start. In other words, life didn’t take million of years to adapt. This is found in bedrock-fossilized sediment.

Despite all the dogmatic statements to the contrary the theory of evolution remains a theory. Nowhere on earth do we find visible evidence of creatures that are partially formed coming into existence. Nowhere on earth do we find animals visibly changing from one kind into another. The genetic (DNA) barrier has fixed the boundaries of the species or kind and this is a scientific fact.

*Note link* http://www.darwinsdilemma.org/darwins-dilemma.php
 

BrotherBuz

Active Member
Absolutely no transitional forms either in the fossil record or in modern animal and plant life have been found. All appear fully formed and complete. The fossil record amply supplies us with representation of almost all species of animals and plants but none of the supposed links of plant to animal, fish to amphibian, amphibian to reptile, or reptile to birds and mammals are represented nor any transitional forms at all. There are essentially the same gaps between all the basic kinds in the fossil record as exists in plant and animal life today. There are literally a host of missing links in the fossil record and the modern world.
 

BrotherBuz

Active Member
There is no evidence in the fossil record of one kind of creature becoming another kind. No transitional links or intermediate forms between various kinds of creatures have ever been found." For example, "the evolutionist claims that it took perhaps fifty million years for a fish to evolve into an amphibian. But, again, there are no transitional forms. For example, not a single fossil with part fins...part feet has been found. And this is true between every major plant and animal kind.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Did you just completely ignore my links (with photos of) hundreds of transitional creatures? Seriously,just how deep can you actually bury your head in the sand?Or do you only believe what you read in "God approved" websites. Guess you really can't debate with an idiot,never believed it until now.
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
I know . . . indisputable knowledge like this cramp your life style. :roll:
Even if adult Santa Clause was real my lifestyle wouldn't change one bit.

I don't live a good honest life because I fear punishment after death, I live it because it's the right thing to do.

Ponder that for a while...
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
Also, I'd like to point out, are you really so stupid to think that an omniscent being will favor blind obedience over honest, genuine inquiry into the true nature of reality?

Rhetorical. We already know the answer to that..

This is the kinda shit that makes believers ACTUALLY dumber than everybody else.

Carry on bro, you are SHINING!! lmao
 

KlosetKing

Well-Known Member
Did you just completely ignore my links (with photos of) hundreds of transitional creatures? Seriously,just how deep can you actually bury your head in the sand?Or do you only believe what you read in "God approved" websites. Guess you really can't debate with an idiot,never believed it until now.
Yes he did.

Now he is busy rambling to himself about being 'right' and 'holy'.

I wonder if that's how that Christian who ran into the church and shot that abortion doctor to death (in front of his family) feels? You know, self empowered, with nothing you can say that can ever possibly make him second guess his ideals.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
Ill just reply with these links again...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transitional_fossil
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_transitional_fossils

And one especially for you BrotherBuz:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_human_evolution_fossils

They are all referenced, so dont say they're bullshit. At least pick apart the info before dismissing it with your high and mighty dogmatic dribble.

EDIT: This is for your Cambrian Explosion argument too
It is currently debated whether the Cambrian explosion represents a sudden increase in diversity or merely a sudden increase in fossilization probability. Some paleontologists believe that most of the diversification of body plans occurred before the Cambrian explosion, but happened in soft-bodied organisms less amenable to fossilization. During the Cambrian era, however, global environmental changes created selection pressure for hard shells, which increased the probability of fossilization. According to this account, which receives some confirmation both from Precambrian fossils and from molecular clocks, the apparent "explosion" of body forms in the Cambrian era is an illusion.
Drawn from: http://vuletic.com/hume/cefec/5-8.html
This article is also referenced ;)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top