Maybe John Kennedy's driver William Greer shot him with an air pistol

Status
Not open for further replies.
doc111

doc111

Well-Known Member
fabfun said:
i just hate when someone thinks their opinion is right so they feel the need to bombard people to try to pound their opinion into others
dude made his point clear and no one bought that bs he was peddling so he needs to roll his wagon on down the road

no one is buying bullshit here now roll on down the road because your bullshit is smelling up the place baddddddddddddddd
Click to expand...
I totally agree man. Doesn't basically making the same post over and over constitute spamming?:?
 
7

7forever

Active Member
The fatal shot came from the driver's seat and nowhere else. Those two moronic clowns debunked nothing but failed miserably at disinformation. When a man gets shot in face, he goes backward as is exactly what happens in real life.

 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
If the driver had turned around and shot JFK he would have hit him either in the forehead or the LEFT side of his head, IMPOSSIBLE to shoot the right side of his head from the left side of the car. Debunking clearly debunked by SCIENCE and common sense.
 
mindphuk

mindphuk

Well-Known Member
7forever said:
The fatal shot came from the driver's seat and nowhere else. Those two moronic clowns debunked nothing but failed miserably at disinformation. When a man gets shot in face, he goes backward as is exactly what happens in real life.
Click to expand...
You must know this to be true since you shoot people in real life all of the time, right? Simple physics disproves your claims. The head CAN move in the direction the bullet came from.

[video=google;745248745546892501]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=745248745546892501#[/video]
 
7

7forever

Active Member
NoDrama said:
If the driver had turned around and shot JFK he would have hit him either in the forehead or the LEFT side of his head, IMPOSSIBLE to shoot the right side of his head from the left side of the car. Debunking clearly debunked by SCIENCE and common sense.
Click to expand...
He did shoot him in the right forehead. I posted that many times. It was fun to make fun of these idiot magicians.
 
7

7forever

Active Member
mindphuk said:
You must know this to be true since you shoot people in real life all of the time, right? Simple physics disproves your claims. The head CAN move in the direction the bullet came from.

[video=google;745248745546892501]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=745248745546892501#[/video]
Click to expand...
You are silly. It is not possible and real life exposes the obvious, Zapruder film fantasy. Show me one person besides Kennedy where your silly claim is possible. You cannot because there is no such case ever recorded because it never happened.
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
7forever said:
He did shoot him in the right forehead. I posted that many times. It was fun to make fun of these idiot magicians.
Click to expand...
The driver cannot see the right side of anything of JFK, the driver is far to far to the left to hit anything remotely on the right side. You aren't going to convince many people of this assertion that the driver did it, most people are not so foolish.
 
7

7forever

Active Member
mindphuk said:
You must know this to be true since you shoot people in real life all of the time, right? Simple physics disproves your claims. The head CAN move in the direction the bullet came from.

[video=google;745248745546892501]http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=745248745546892501#[/video]
Click to expand...
You make my point quite well, thanks. The average person has no idea what it REALLY looks like when a person gets shot in the head and that is exactly why all this silliness has lasted for 47 years. Thanks to google, harsh reality can be seen and used to expose the silly zapruder film fake out.
 
7

7forever

Active Member
NoDrama said:
The driver cannot see the right side of anything of JFK, the driver is far to far to the left to hit anything remotely on the right side. You aren't going to convince many people of this assertion that the driver did it, most people are not so foolish.
Click to expand...
It doesn't matter if you believe me or the obvious evidence against Greer, only that it's been posted everywhere and never even remotely challenged. Greer fired over his right shoulder and directly into jfk's forehead. The Zfilm was for sure altered because we see Greer's left arm crossing in the nix film.
 
Big P

Big P

Well-Known Member
7forever his head snaped forward first if you look at the video


once again your are foolish:



Here is a broader and longer view of the forward snap and the beginning of the rearward lurch, also provided by Alexandre. He used better images for this work. The sequence starts at 311 and continues through 317. View it repeatedly, and you will see not only JFK's motions, but the lack of corresponding motions by any of the other passengers. This gives the lie to ideas that an deceleration of the car caused any of the motions—it didn't happen that way.
I also think I see a quick little rearward snap in 314 (sort of a "pop-back") right after the forward snap. If so, it would likely be a visible manifestation of the jet effect. Comments by viewers would be appreciated.
311–317
Alexandre has also provided separate small-scale animations for 311–316, 312–313, 313–314, and 314–315. I encourage anyone who wants to focus on details (where the Devil is in this case) to study these little sequences. To my eye, they show even more strongly the snap in 313, a little pop-back at 314, and the beginning of the big lurch in 315.
311–316

312–313

313–314

314–315
 
N

NoDrama

Well-Known Member
Not only that, but in order for him to shoot JFK, he would hav had to have shot Mrs. Connoly as she is in the direct path. didn't happen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top