90% of the Trumpists here have no idea whether N. Korea is friend or foe. 90% of them think Jim Jordan is their Senator despite him being a Congressman from 100 miles away.This is a fucking stupid thread. Harris misspoke. The first thing republicans can find to harass her about, and it's a simple case of misspeaking...Well string the bitch the fuck up...Typical republican fucktardery.
You try to imply that the woman is unaware of our political relationship with both North and South Korea, which is just insulting. And wrong. And you know it. Which also implies that you think we're stupid enough to believe this horseshit, which is also insulting. And wrong.
So your answer is to say mean things about people. Attacking people who may or may not believe the same way you believe is not the answer to anything. If you're happy with a vice president who is not aware of current political state of the United states, I'm fine with that. I will not stoop to your level and call you names because of how you feel or what you think.90% of the Trumpists here have no idea whether N. Korea is friend or foe. 90% of them think Jim Jordan is their Senator despite him being a Congressman from 100 miles away.
To think that Kamela Harris does not know is laughable. She mis-spoke. People do that sometimes.
This thread is an embarrassment to the right wing as it proves they are so ignorant about international affairs that they can believe such nonsense.
Kudos to the troll who posted it.
you said mean things about Harris, and now you're snowflaking about getting the same treatment?So your answer is to say mean things about people. Attacking people who may or may not believe the same way you believe is not the answer to anything. If you're happy with a vice president who is not aware of current political state of the United states, I'm fine with that. I will not stoop to your level and call you names because of how you feel or what you think.
those who promote lies are at the lowest level, therefore you will never find yourself stooping.I will not stoop to your level and call you names because of how you feel or what you think.
He didn't call you a name, he accurately characterized the stupid thinking behind this thread. You doubled down in your recent post. Harris is "not aware of current political state of the United State". lolSo your answer is to say mean things about people. Attacking people who may or may not believe the same way you believe is not the answer to anything. If you're happy with a vice president who is not aware of current political state of the United states, I'm fine with that. I will not stoop to your level and call you names because of how you feel or what you think.
I made an observation about what she said. Like I said if you believe it's okay for the vice president of the United States to not know the Diplomatic status of the United States and their allies I'm fine with that. I will not debase you because of what you think or how you feel. To do so would be divisive. I hope that someone would come on and an intelligent conversation could be made about the vice president. Instead you want to attack the messenger. I am used to being attacked by liberals because I don't agree with most of what they believe.you said mean things about Harris, and now you're snowflaking about getting the same treatment?
man up, for god's sake. don't fucking dish it if you can't take it, buttercup.
We already tried that. You rejected it.I made an observation about what she said. Like I said if you believe it's okay for the vice president of the United States to not know the Diplomatic status of the United States and their allies I'm fine with that. I will not debase you because of what you think or how you feel. To do so would be divisive. I hope that someone would come on and an intelligent conversation could be made about the vice president. Instead you want to attack the messenger. I am used to being attacked by liberals because I don't agree with most of what they believe.
What is the point if you are just being intellectually dishonest?I made an observation about what she said. Like I said if you believe it's okay for the vice president of the United States to not know the Diplomatic status of the United States and their allies I'm fine with that. I will not debase you because of what you think or how you feel. To do so would be divisive. I hope that someone would come on and an intelligent conversation could be made about the vice president. Instead you want to attack the messenger. I am used to being attacked by liberals because I don't agree with most of what they believe.
no...saying "it's ok for the vice president of the united states to not know the diplomatic status of the united sates and their allies" is a LIE...she misspoke...obviously. she later corrected herself...you are perpetuating a LIE by saying that she was unaware of the situation, when she got confused and misspoke...quit LYING, and we'll quit calling you a LIAR.I made an observation about what she said. Like I said if you believe it's okay for the vice president of the United States to not know the Diplomatic status of the United States and their allies I'm fine with that. I will not debase you because of what you think or how you feel. To do so would be divisive. I hope that someone would come on and an intelligent conversation could be made about the vice president. Instead you want to attack the messenger. I am used to being attacked by liberals because I don't agree with most of what they believe.
You didn't "make an observation", you spun one sentence into a sweeping ad hominem. As if Harris's entire career didn't exist and we could only judge her from this one sentence.I made an observation about what she said. Like I said if you believe it's okay for the vice president of the United States to not know the Diplomatic status of the United States and their allies I'm fine with that. I will not debase you because of what you think or how you feel. To do so would be divisive. I hope that someone would come on and an intelligent conversation could be made about the vice president. Instead you want to attack the messenger. I am used to being attacked by liberals because I don't agree with most of what they believe.
This is a good post and sums it up well.This is a fucking stupid thread. Harris misspoke. The first thing republicans can find to harass her about, and it's a simple case of misspeaking...Well string the bitch the fuck up...Typical republican fucktardery.
You try to imply that the woman is unaware of our political relationship with both North and South Korea, which is just insulting. And wrong. And you know it. Which also implies that you think we're stupid enough to believe this horseshit, which is also insulting. And wrong.
Don’t forget Kamala also made Brett Kavanaugh her little bitch. I will always love her for that.You didn't "make an observation", you spun one sentence into a sweeping ad hominem. As if Harris's entire career didn't exist and we could only judge her from this one sentence.
But there is plenty to see and read that shows she's damn smart. For example,
Her skewering Bill Barr was brilliant.
View attachment 5207664
He was slippery but she got the (then) attorney general to admit he did not examine the underlying evidence before deciding the president would not be charged. She dragged it out of him, question by question.
So, you go ahead and put on your tunnel vision goggles and look at one sentence as if it represents her whole life. It's a dumbass way to try to make a point. Because, well, there is plenty of evidence to show you are wrong. Your replies in this post sound more like Bill Barr during his grilling by Harris. Who is the stupid one? It's pretty clear Harris is not.
Yeah, the record is clear that when she cross examines somebody who is under oath and therefore can't lie, people trying to hide the truth get flayed.Don’t forget Kamala also made Brett Kavanaugh her little bitch. I will always love her for that.