Donald Trump Private Citizen

S

schuylaar

Well-Known Member
DIY-HP-LED said:
I guess you are in favor of the rule of law and equality under the law, including enforcement too. So you should have no problem with Trump going to prison for breaking the law after a fair trial by a judge a jury. I figure those who were involved in the insurrection should be hung in public, the old fashioned way, but the law says the should be just imprisoned for their crimes.
Click to expand...
they want 1865? HANG 'EM HIGH!

1641307067701.png

and that was just for conspiracy..can you imagine if you where really there? if there were SMART Technology to track you down? still looking for 350 Insurrectionists.

is your border open yet to drive to Canada? Just curious.
 
Last edited:
subwax

subwax

Well-Known Member
Thank goodness he is no longer valid. The world seems like a scarier place wit him in change of the US.
 
printer

printer

Well-Known Member
BodegaBud said:
Less taxes and to use the taxes we have how they should be spent, less government control overall but enforcement of laws which are common sense, empathy towards victims rather than criminals, stop making excuses for criminals, and stop allowing people to be homeless by offering them shelter or jail. Enforcement of immigration laws. Increase penalties for people who harm kids or animals. Sensibly protect our environment and control urban sprawl
Click to expand...
So you want less taxes and less government. But with more (government control) law enforcement. I would guess that means more jails. The zero tolerance of crime, was there not a three strikes you are out think back in the day? How did that work out. I guess you will need a lot more cops to catch all the crime also. I don't know about you but the city pays for our cops, so that is city taxes. And the police as well as emergency services (paramedic) make up over half our tax bill. Laws that are common seance, you are for less laws then. Which do you not agree with? On that note, are not laws made up when someone gets hurt (in different forms), well other than marijuana laws.

Stop making excuses for criminals, I guess that means longer sentences and more jails. So you do not want to see the homelessness, yes they can be dirty. So you want to develop more beds, either shelters or jails, tax money I guess. Immigration laws. I guess more jails again. After all, people would chance getting caught if it is between that and having no food or place to live in another country. More jail time again, this time for kids and animals. Oh right, more people hired to find the immigrants, also those who hurt kids. Does that include their parents? So what if the parent does not discipline the kids and they commit a crime? Take them away? Take the kid away? Sensibly protect the environment? So the wall should go up along the Rio Grande River even if it cuts in half a habitat, which would reduce genetic diversity of the animals. Control urban sprawl. Sounds like the big hand of government controlling its people again. That is unless you force people to live in apartment blocks if they want a job in the city.

BodegaBud said:
Election integrity by requiring ID and in person voting. ... That’s all I have for now
Click to expand...
But what about the person that has a problem getting to the polling station? Will you help them get out to vote or just too bad? Also that would mean more polling stations I would guess, to accommodate people more. Not reduce the number of stations, which Republicans have done in Democrat leaning riding's. Also, what makes you think people are cheating, would you fix Gerrymandering? Also, what are the statistics you are using to infer people are cheating in elections?

BodegaBud said:
That’s what makes the most sense. And that’s what we need to get back to. We need to stop going off emotion and feeling sorry for people who take absolutely no responsibility for their situation and do what needs to get done. Currently everything from crime, immigration, to homelessness is a mess because people are using feelings rather than rational when dealing with them. They don’t enforce the rules that need to be enforced for a civilized society
Click to expand...
OK, do not feel sorry for people. So I guess that means theow them in jail, or fine them? What about if they have no money? Throw them in jail? And what if there are inequities in society? Would you fix those also or are they just one of the things 'what need to get done' or say live it and lump it? Sounds like you almost are describing China.
 
CatHedral

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
printer said:
So you want less taxes and less government. But with more (government control) law enforcement. I would guess that means more jails. The zero tolerance of crime, was there not a three strikes you are out think back in the day? How did that work out. I guess you will need a lot more cops to catch all the crime also. I don't know about you but the city pays for our cops, so that is city taxes. And the police as well as emergency services (paramedic) make up over half our tax bill. Laws that are common seance, you are for less laws then. Which do you not agree with? On that note, are not laws made up when someone gets hurt (in different forms), well other than marijuana laws.

Stop making excuses for criminals, I guess that means longer sentences and more jails. So you do not want to see the homelessness, yes they can be dirty. So you want to develop more beds, either shelters or jails, tax money I guess. Immigration laws. I guess more jails again. After all, people would chance getting caught if it is between that and having no food or place to live in another country. More jail time again, this time for kids and animals. Oh right, more people hired to find the immigrants, also those who hurt kids. Does that include their parents? So what if the parent does not discipline the kids and they commit a crime? Take them away? Take the kid away? Sensibly protect the environment? So the wall should go up along the Rio Grande River even if it cuts in half a habitat, which would reduce genetic diversity of the animals. Control urban sprawl. Sounds like the big hand of government controlling its people again. That is unless you force people to live in apartment blocks if they want a job in the city.



But what about the person that has a problem getting to the polling station? Will you help them get out to vote or just too bad? Also that would mean more polling stations I would guess, to accommodate people more. Not reduce the number of stations, which Republicans have done in Democrat leaning riding's. Also, what makes you think people are cheating, would you fix Gerrymandering? Also, what are the statistics you are using to infer people are cheating in elections?



OK, do not feel sorry for people. So I guess that means theow them in jail, or fine them? What about if they have no money? Throw them in jail? And what if there are inequities in society? Would you fix those also or are they just one of the things 'what need to get done' or say live it and lump it? Sounds like you almost are describing China.
Click to expand...
You are attempting to reason with a MAGA.
1641313998359.jpeg
 
CatHedral

CatHedral

Well-Known Member
printer said:
I have heard the same things for half a century from politicians wanting to get elected but they never seem to deliver. Willing to hear good ideas on how to do it. That is usually the sticking point.
Click to expand...
This one has been through before and could teach evasion.
 
printer

printer

Well-Known Member
Trump blasts 'low-life Twitter' after Greene's account suspended
Trump called the social media network "a disgrace to democracy," adding that the company "shouldn't be allowed to do business in this Country."

"Marjorie Taylor Greene has a huge constituency of honest, patriotic, hard-working people," Trump said. "They don’t deserve what’s happened to them on places like low-life Twitter and Facebook."

He then encouraged his supporters to "drop off" both Twitter and Facebook, calling them "boring" and "hated by everyone," and claimed they only portray left-leaning views.

"They are a disgrace to our Nation. Keep fighting, Marjorie!" Trump said

"Twitter is an enemy to America and can’t handle the truth," Greene said. "That’s fine, I’ll show America we don’t need them and it’s time to defeat our enemies."
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/588100-trump-blasts-low-life-twitter-after-greene-suspended
 
Herb & Suds

Herb & Suds

Well-Known Member
printer said:
Trump blasts 'low-life Twitter' after Greene's account suspended
Trump called the social media network "a disgrace to democracy," adding that the company "shouldn't be allowed to do business in this Country."

"Marjorie Taylor Greene has a huge constituency of honest, patriotic, hard-working people," Trump said. "They don’t deserve what’s happened to them on places like low-life Twitter and Facebook."

He then encouraged his supporters to "drop off" both Twitter and Facebook, calling them "boring" and "hated by everyone," and claimed they only portray left-leaning views.

"They are a disgrace to our Nation. Keep fighting, Marjorie!" Trump said

"Twitter is an enemy to America and can’t handle the truth," Greene said. "That’s fine, I’ll show America we don’t need them and it’s time to defeat our enemies."
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/588100-trump-blasts-low-life-twitter-after-greene-suspended
Click to expand...
He sounds just like Hitler
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top