I never said anything negative about your mother. I think she is wonderful person to not have aborted a child like yourself...some what Saint like. Merely showing how you and your family used and abused the system that you complain about. I also don't blame her for you being a supporter of pedophiles or your racist beliefs. I'm sure she raised you better that that, due to her being such a wonderful loving lady. Shame that you can't support her right as a women to not be discriminated against for being a female. Hmmmm you don't talk much about your father. Is he the one to blame for your beliefs
Try to stay focused when you struggle thru my postulation below.
Rights are important. That's why the following is true...I'm sure you'll be able to point out the part you disagree with and why it's consistent with protecting individual rights.
Womens rights? No such thing as a sole or distinct concept.
All people have the same right to self determine, women don't have anymore or less right than men in that regard.
No person has a right to forcibly insist another peaceful or neutral person obey or serve them,
absent prior consensual mutual individual agreement. To believe otherwise is being a slavery apologist.
Every person has the right to self determine, to make their own choices and to be able to discriminate between their own possible rightful choices.
If you can't make your own rightful choices freely, and others make them for you, using force to effectuate....that's where the bad kind of discrimination begins. Discrimination isn't only a negative word as you seem to think, it is a neutral word until placed in context.
Clearly, you wrongfully believe some people, are exempt when they apply offensive force and when they force a human association, it's acceptable. In other words you unwittingly approve of some forms of slavery, because you've been told unless a person is in actual chains, they aren't really enslaved. You believe in the flawed concept of "authority" , or "unequal rights". You are a rights violator and assign some people rights they don't have, you "discriminate" (in a bad way) when you do that and you are enabling a systemic inequality, that being "authority".
You are heavily indoctrinated to accept the denial of your own rights, and as long as "authority" applies their "authority" equally over lesser subjects, you consider that as the apex of freedom. It's likely a product of your ingrained obedience training you were subjected to and continue to accept as gospel.
There can be no such thing as a right to force another independent uncontracted person to serve you against there will, without there being an element of slavery involved.
Your premise is that in order to "protect" a nonexistent right, that of forced servitude, it is acceptable to violate another right, the extinguishment of peaceful and/or neutral self determination. That's impossible.
When two people don't have a mutual interest in associating, the person that forces the association is a rights violator. (that would be you) The polite person finds other ways to peacefully disassociate, usually by minding their own business and property.
Specifically which part above is inaccurate ?
