Good Luck, Canada.

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Finally a definition that can be defended..

please show me one post where I was discriminatory or prejudiced against another race. Just one where I believe that one race is superior than another. I think the closest you can get is where I said that races are different (this is scientific fact and not discriminatory and I specifically followed it with difference =/= superiority) I am guessing you will bring up immigration but asking what's best for the country isn't discriminatory against a specific race at all. And this is where it becomes name calling. If you can't call out my actual words just jump on the 'racist-bigot-sexist' bandwagon.




Nope, have literally walked up and scared them twice, once in Ontario, once in nys. Twice more I've walked up on mama bear and her cubs. Bear attacks may be rare (compared to car accidents) but are not that unlikely for people that spend a lot of time outdoors. Tbh, I am much more afraid of people in the woods. I am not against gun control but look how well it's worked out for Chicago. Even Australia with their tight gun control and the advantage of being able to protect their borders have several mass shootings a year.


Not buying it. How many of the pot charges were plea deals to avoid costly litigation over intent to distribute or weapons charges? How many were over failure to comply (wonder where they got the idea from... The media perhaps, what's that song by ghostface, "run"?)You know if cops are parked in a street where muggings occur frequently and they observe crime there it's not racist and probably everyone that lives there wants the police presence so they can get on with their lives.
Shut up racist
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
High crime areas mean black areas of Toronto to you or native parts of Winnipeg, crime happens everywhere, it's just more apparent among the poor
You're right, we should take all the police keeping the hard working poor safe and put them in upscale neighbourhoods to sit on their asses. To me this is more racist than having an increased police presence where there's more crime and more violent crime in particular.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
You're right, we should take all the police keeping the hard working poor safe and put them in upscale neighbourhoods to sit on their asses. To me this is more racist than having an increased police presence where there's more crime and more violent crime in particular.
Well, only if you ignore all the crimes that people like your neo nazi praising hero are committing
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Finally a definition that can be defended..

please show me one post where I was discriminatory or prejudiced against another race. Just one where I believe that one race is superior than another. I think the closest you can get is where I said that races are different (this is scientific fact and not discriminatory and I specifically followed it with difference =/= superiority) I am guessing you will bring up immigration but asking what's best for the country isn't discriminatory against a specific race at all. And this is where it becomes name calling. If you can't call out my actual words just jump on the 'racist-bigot-sexist' bandwagon.




Nope, have literally walked up and scared them twice, once in Ontario, once in nys. Twice more I've walked up on mama bear and her cubs. Bear attacks may be rare (compared to car accidents) but are not that unlikely for people that spend a lot of time outdoors. Tbh, I am much more afraid of people in the woods. I am not against gun control but look how well it's worked out for Chicago. Even Australia with their tight gun control and the advantage of being able to protect their borders have several mass shootings a year.


Not buying it. How many of the pot charges were plea deals to avoid costly litigation over intent to distribute or weapons charges? How many were over failure to comply (wonder where they got the idea from... The media perhaps, what's that song by ghostface, "run"?)You know if cops are parked in a street where muggings occur frequently and they observe crime there it's not racist and probably everyone that lives there wants the police presence so they can get on with their lives.
Here is one of your recent posts. This proves beyond any doubt you are a heartless cocksucker, a wing nut and a fucking liar. What about the kids who were murdered at Sandy Hook? What about their relatives? What kind of fucking idiot believes this bullshit? I don't need to research your posts to know what you are, neither does any other decent person on this form. Stop whining and admit what you are, this bullshit ain't working and your wasting my time and your life. Spout off publicly in Canada and you'd be busted, the American experience proves that we need even harsher laws against racism and bigotry.

Don't bother responding, I don't believe a word you say anyway. Your gross disrespect for the victims of mass murder and their families is disgusting and makes you unfit company for decent men. You are driven by fear, hate, greed and delusion, the big four own your ass and one of them is almost constantly in your driver's seat. Racism and bigotry are merely symptoms of a larger character defect and a total lack of personal integrity. Your not worthy of respect and any racist traitor would own you and your vote in a heartbeat, you're a fear driven sucker, plain and simple.

"
"
Ok, so ignoring whether or not sandy hook was a conspiracy, don't you think it is 100% the government's fault the conspiracy exists?

There was another shooting the same week in the south. An elementary student shot three kids, a teacher, and himself. Within 12h there were videos from cctv, the paramedics, and the students themselves. When sandy hook happened, there have never been any videos released by any of thousands of students, none from paramedics, nothing from the govt. Hell they even went as far as to demolish the building (ostensibly to prevent theft, but columbine still stands and no such action has been taken at other sites of mass shootings, so this reasoning is obviously false/deliberately misleading) and spent billions rebuilding a new one (that's a lot of money for a school, why? Did they also burn the desks and computers)
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
Here is one of your recent posts. This proves beyond any doubt you are a heartless cocksucker, a wing nut and a fucking liar. What about the kids who were murdered at Sandy Hook? What about their relatives? What kind of fucking idiot believes this bullshit? I don't need to research your posts to know what you are, neither does any other decent person on this form. Stop whining and admit what you are, this bullshit ain't working and your wasting my time and your life. Spout off publicly in Canada and you'd be busted, the American experience proves that we need even harsher laws against racism and bigotry.

Don't bother responding, I don't believe a word you say anyway. Your gross disrespect for the victims of mass murder and their families is disgusting and makes you unfit company for decent men. You are driven by fear, hate, greed and delusion, the big four own your ass and one of them is almost constantly in your driver's seat. Racism and bigotry are merely symptoms of a larger character defect and a total lack of personal integrity. Your not worthy of respect and any racist traitor would own you and your vote in a heartbeat, you're a fear driven sucker, plain and simple.

"
"
Picks post that explicitly states that there would be less conspiracy theories if there was more transparency and openness.
Calls it racism
Are you this unable to cope with conversations in your everyday life?
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
Like I said you are full of shit and fooling nobody here. Don't bother adults with your drivel
Let me just slander your name, put words in your mouth.
Don't bother replying, kid.
Lol. Care to call me more things you can't back up?

Not trying to be combative, really. But do you see how lying about other people just because their views differ from yours is wrong? Do you understand that calling racist to try to shut down a discussion instead of addressing the others concerns is also wrong? I don't believe that any one side is correct in any political disagreement, rather both sides have some truth and trying to come together is where progress happens. Is kowtowing to your friends (and ignoring reality) really worth your integrity?
 

QUAD BREATH

Well-Known Member
Riiiighht. In today's world words are violence and you can 'rape' someone by smiling at them. Trudeaus minister just called someone a neo-nazi for taking a picture with a man with a yellow vest ffs.
Tripple

Going back to animals fear and guns. Is the prime minister afraid, and a coward because he wore a bullet proof vest to a rally? What about the pope or the president and their bulletproof glass sheilds? Are they afraid cowards, or just smart. I don't take a gun out but only because of weight. I have been near bears a number of times and their cubs as well. If you go out there are situations that are dangerous and having the right tools can make a big difference. An example would be when you are 10-14 days between resupply points, even if you hang your food you might have to defend it. Bears are not so scared of bear bangers and you would be nuts to be out by yourself with no cell service and no way out of the forest trying to scare a bear away with no plan b, just saying.
Dipple

Ok, maybe not required, but strongly encouraged. Have you not seen signs that say travel is forbidden if in groups of less than 4? They're common, go walk the cdt and you will see some.
Lying

Nope, have literally walked up and scared them twice, once in Ontario, once in nys. Twice more I've walked up on mama bear and her cubs. Bear attacks may be rare (compared to car accidents) but are not that unlikely for people that spend a lot of time outdoors. Tbh, I am much more afraid of people in the woods. I am not against gun control but look how well it's worked out for Chicago. Even Australia with their tight gun control and the advantage of being able to protect their borders have several mass shootings a year.
Dipshit
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Let me just slander your name, put words in your mouth.
Don't bother replying, kid.
Lol. Care to call me more things you can't back up?

Not trying to be combative, really. But do you see how lying about other people just because their views differ from yours is wrong? Do you understand that calling racist to try to shut down a discussion instead of addressing the others concerns is also wrong? I don't believe that any one side is correct in any political disagreement, rather both sides have some truth and trying to come together is where progress happens. Is kowtowing to your friends (and ignoring reality) really worth your integrity?
Stop being so combative you racist
 

Budley Doright

Well-Known Member
Nope, have literally walked up and scared them twice, once in Ontario, once in nys. Twice more I've walked up on mama bear and her cubs. Bear attacks may be rare (compared to car accidents) but are not that unlikely for people that spend a lot of time outdoors.
Compared to car accidents???? Where are you getting this shit from? Here I’ll help you!!!

“Taylor Y. Cardall and Peter Rosen, in their article "Grizzly Bear Attack" published in the Journal of Emergency Medicine documented 162 bear-inflicted injuries in the United States between 1900 and 1985.[1] Stephen Herrero, a Canadian biologist, reports that during the 1990s bears killed around three people a year in the U.S. and Canada, as compared to the 15 people killed every year by dogs.[2]These numbers are averages over the entire U.S. population,”
 

hanimmal

Well-Known Member
What is racist to you? Is supporting merit based immigration over refugees racist? Is policing high crime areas racist if populations aren't evenly distributed? Is supporting women's freedom in the middle east racist? These are things that can be debated. Going 'naw it's racist' to everything you don't like is exactly why these categories don't mean anything. And yes is an ad hominem simply because you prefer to call me names than debate any of the statements themselves.
The racists are the ones that are pushing this idea, it doesn't make everyone that falls for it racists necessarily. They may not understand why it is bullshit and think that it seems like a sound reasoning.

People with low skills immigrate to have a better chance at success in life for themselves and their children. Our countries benefit along with their economic growth.
 

DIY-HP-LED

Well-Known Member
Lol, accusing someone of being racist out of one side of your mouth while saying someone "owns you like a slave" out of the other.

What's next? An insult insinuating he's gay or calling him a cocksucker while championing LGBTQ+ lifestyles, because you're "OK" with that?

How fucking "woke" of you. Next you and your gang of hypocrites will be deciding which people get to be treated like people, you phoney fuck(s)!!!
Burt, this guy is just a snake playing games, you don't agree with this bigot, I judged him by his posts and his intentions shine through in them. He is just trying to sound reasonable but failing miserably.

I know ya got a beef with Buck, but we have no such problems, I know where you stand on these issues. Please don't get on this clown's side for the wrong reasons. This guy claims the Sandy Hook massacre of children did not happen to drive an agenda, it's the same with raising doubts about the holocaust or the numerous lies he has been caught in here. It does not take too many posts to see through this guy and where he is coming from, he wants his gun before common sense and the way he wants it is indicative of someone driven by fear and hate. He is smart enough not to state his views explicitly, but never denied being a racist, just wanted a specific quote form me to "prove" it. I asked him to deny being a racist several times, each time he just danced, and did not deny, though after reading this I'm sure he will.

Separate your beef with Buck from this turd before ya get the stink of him on ya. Pick a fight with Buck over someone worth the fight, not a Tory gun freak and your political adversary. He has no integrity and it has been proven, he is not worth the trouble buddy, your beef is with Buck, not me. This person has not been treated unjustly by people here, they have just seen through the bullshit, we've all seen it before, far too many times. People make mistakes here Burt, but not this time and not over this guy. Defending this guy would be like defending Trump.

Burt, even gay guys call assholes, cocksuckers, and I'd call anybody who abused the parents of slain children the way this cocksucker did in his Sandy Hook accusations, a cocksucker, or if you prefer an asshole, same thing. It's the intention behind the words that counts and mine was to call this person what they are, using the common vernacular. There is nothing wrong with sucking cocks, many women do it and so do the gay, I have nothing against either.:)
 
Last edited:

Rider101

Well-Known Member
Unclebaldrick i VOTED!


Smoking a joint laughing my ass off.

So many miserably angry people karma is a real bitch eh.
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
This guy claims the Sandy Hook massacre of children did not happen
You claim to know me by my posts, and you even link the one where I actually mention sandy hook, and it has nothing to do with whether it happened or not.. The post was about govt. transparency. You even linked the post so anyone can see that you are again spreading lies.. So are you willfully ignorant of what I've said or are you purposely manipulating my words with bad intentions?

Edit to note that if you actually read any of my posts I am pro gun control, think trumps an idiot (still a better choice than hilldog though), and am generally liberal and advocate for common sense solutions. The world today has it's head so far up it's own ass it can't tell reality from the shit that's being forced down it's throat. Emotions are not what corporations and countries should be run on, simple. Corporations are beholden to the best interests of their shareholders just as countries are beholden to the best interests of the citizenry. I am sorry that you think the role of the government's big daddy who is legally required to take care of baby, that there is no such thing as personal responsibility, and that the welfare of the noisy 1% or even the millions of non-citizens are more important than the welfare of the millions that work for the benefit of this country and who actually live here. To bad you would rather misconstrue what I say just to blend in with the holier than thou crowd.
 
Last edited:

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
You claim to know me by my posts, and you even link the one where I actually mention sandy hook, and it has nothing to do with whether it happened or not.. The post was about govt. transparency. You even linked the post so anyone can see that you are again spreading lies.. So are you willfully ignorant of what I've said or are you purposely manipulating my words with bad intentions?

Edit to note that if you actually read any of my posts I am pro gun control, think trumps an idiot (still a better choice than hilldog though), and am generally liberal and advocate for common sense solutions. The world today has it's head so far up it's own ass it can't tell reality from the shit that's being forced down it's throat. Emotions are not what corporations and countries should be run on, simple. Corporations are beholden to the best interests of their shareholders just as countries are beholden to the best interests of the citizenry. I am sorry that you think the role of the government's big daddy who is legally required to take care of baby, that there is no such thing as personal responsibility, and that the welfare of the noisy 1% or even the millions of non-citizens are more important than the welfare of the millions that work for the benefit of this country and who actually live here. To bad you would rather misconstrue what I say just to blend in with the holier than thou crowd.
Yeah, fuck your government transparency. You just use the tried an true tactic of the day where you find a fact, pretty much any fact, and then assign some sort of ulterior motive to it. This is the problem of being a very not smart person in the information age.
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
Compared to car accidents???? Where are you getting this shit from? Here I’ll help you!!!

“Taylor Y. Cardall and Peter Rosen, in their article "Grizzly Bear Attack" published in the Journal of Emergency Medicine documented 162 bear-inflicted injuries in the United States between 1900 and 1985.[1] Stephen Herrero, a Canadian biologist, reports that during the 1990s bears killed around three people a year in the U.S. and Canada, as compared to the 15 people killed every year by dogs.[2]These numbers are averages over the entire U.S. population,”
There's a reason they only report fatal attacks and from the year 1900. Peoples range is expanding and theirs is decreasing, attacks are on the rise.

National geographic puts black bear attacks at 20-30 per year in canada. Nature (journal) buts brown bear attacks at 12 a year in north America. Wikipedia will claim that healthy wolves have only killed two people on record, but we have half a dozen attacks in north America yearly.

And my comment about cars means there are tens of millions of commuters driving billions of hours. How many combined hours are people out in the forests? Guessing it is 1/100000th if not less of that number.
 

TrippleDip

Well-Known Member
You just use the tried an true tactic of the day where you find a fact, pretty much any fact, and then assign some sort of ulterior motive to it.
Lolol, kinda like you're doing with my posts? Ignoring the black and white facts on the screen just to ascribe motivation to me..

Pot meet kettle.
 

Unclebaldrick

Well-Known Member
There's a reason they only report fatal attacks and from the year 1900. Peoples range is expanding and theirs is decreasing, attacks are on the rise.

National geographic puts black bear attacks at 20-30 per year in canada. Nature (journal) buts brown bear attacks at 12 a year in north America. Wikipedia will claim that healthy wolves have only killed two people on record, but we have half a dozen attacks in north America yearly.

And my comment about cars means there are tens of millions of commuters driving billions of hours. How many combined hours are people out in the forests? Guessing it is 1/100000th if not less of that number.
Are you still trying to justify your lie about it being illegal to go out in the woods without a gun?

Fucking sad.
 
Top