The Dems cave in

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
clinton voters made up less than 50% of the deadbeat counties.

clinton voters made up greater than 50% of the productive counties.

show me the mathematical equation in which trump voters aren't the deadbeats, genius.
election-map-3d-by-county.png
you're on the KKK side of that picture since you, along with the KKK, both oppose civil rights and immigration.
no surprise you only see the two opposing sides when there are four parties in that graphic, you being the larper.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
View attachment 4078185

no surprise you only see the two opposing sides when there are four parties in that graphic, you being the larper.
at least you didn;t cry about being called a klansman, which you are.

nice graphic. it shows that the most productive counties: los angeles, cook, harris, and new york, were incredibly heavy clinton majorities. thus proving my point.

no one likes you. you don't smoke or grow. you only ever spam us with your racist shit. so why are you here?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
at least you didn;t cry about being called a klansman, which you are.

nice graphic. it shows that the most productive counties: los angeles, cook, harris, and new york, were incredibly heavy clinton majorities. thus proving my point.

no one likes you. you don't smoke or grow. you only ever spam us with your racist shit. so why are you here?
still bitching hillary lost? you should kys to really drive the point home that the electoral system that keeps a minority of states from telling the majority of states what to do is just unfair and shit because the constitution founded a literal democracy instead of a representative republic in your fucked up little laquer head.

i suggest destroying your liver on here every night while responding to my posts at about a 10:1 ratio ftw.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
still bitching hillary lost? you should kys to really drive the point home that the electoral system that keeps a minority of states from telling the majority of states what to do is just unfair and shit because the constitution founded a literal democracy instead of a representative republic.

i suggest destroying your liver on here every night while responding to my posts at about a 10:1 ratio.
how is it a representative republic if the person with 3 million more votes loses?

and why are you trying to change the subject yet again from the fact that you are a klansman who doesn't smoke or grow (and no one likes you)?

the electoral college was designed to give special rights to slave states. no wonder you celebrate it.
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
how is it a representative republic if the person with 3 million more votes loses?

and why are you trying to change the subject yet again from the fact that you are a klansman who doesn't smoke or grow (and no one likes you)?

the electoral college was designed to give special rights to slave states. no wonder you celebrate it.
yet when clinton lost the primary against Obama but won the popular vote, not a fucking peep.

what a shill you are.
hillary didn't win a majority.
the majority of the popular vote went to NOT HILLARY.

the end.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
yet when clinton lost the primary against Obama but won the popular vote, not a fucking peep.

what a shill you are.
hillary didn't win a majority.
the majority of the popular vote went to NOT HILLARY.

the end.
if we were a representative democracy, the person with the most votes would win. especially if they got 3 million more votes, like hillary did. she got more votes than any white male ever did.

anyhoo, this is just another distraction, trailer cuck. no one likes you. you don't smoke or grow. you only ever spam us with whatever trump is blathering about, or russian bots. so why are you here?
 

twostrokenut

Well-Known Member
if we were a representative democracy, the person with the most votes would win. especially if they got 3 million more votes, like hillary did.
it's a representative democracy because your representatives are elected democratically and that's your branch of government.
you know, 3rd grade shit.

these representatives are not representing america in 1800 either, they are representing you in 2018 and they are the number of electors as well.
you know, 4th grade shit.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
it's a representative democracy because your representatives are elected democratically
we voted on a representative for the executive and the person with 3 million less votes got in though, however illegitimately.

and this is still a distraction. no one likes you. you don't smoke or grow. you only ever repost trump verbatim, or russian bots. so why are you here?
 

Possum1

Well-Known Member
you are literally a retarded person.

@rollitup , i apologize for using an off-limits word. but there is no other way to describe this trailer-dwelling racist cuckold. he has to invent alternate realities to make himself feel better. he is literally mentally retarded.
@Gary Goodson
Just want to make sure you're ok with this. No double standard?
Seriously cheeto hair president is a ridiculous indictment on this country as a whole, but I'm sick of seeing this stereotyping bigot debase all the valid arguments.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
@Gary Goodson
Just want to make sure you're ok with this. No double standard?
Seriously cheeto hair president is a ridiculous indictment on this country as a whole, but I'm sick of seeing this stereotyping bigot debase all the valid arguments.
so let me see if i have this straight.

twostrokenut, who is a white supremacist neo-nazi, claimed that CHIP "was already funded" on the day democrats forced republicans to fund it.

and your claim is that twostrokenut, who is a white supremacist neo-nazi, had a "valid argument".

i'm sorry, but if you are claiing that CHIP "was already funded" on the day they actually funded it, then you are a fucking retarded person too.

no offense, gary. also, possum here is most definitely a trump cocksucking racist sock.
 

Possum1

Well-Known Member
so let me see if i have this straight.

twostrokenut, who is a white supremacist neo-nazi, claimed that CHIP "was already funded" on the day democrats forced republicans to fund it.

and your claim is that twostrokenut, who is a white supremacist neo-nazi, had a "valid argument".

i'm sorry, but if you are claiing that CHIP "was already funded" on the day they actually funded it, then you are a fucking retarded person too.

no offense, gary. also, possum here is most definitely a trump cocksucking racist sock.
Even as a very new member, I know certain terms are bad taste, or off limits totally(this board). You seem immune to using personal atracks and slander, with immunity to all reprisals. I contend you are not a good ambassador for us. You seem to prioritize personal atracks and bigotry. I just don't like bullies.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Even as a very new member, I know certain terms are bad taste, or off limits totally(this board). You seem immune to using personal atracks and slander, with immunity to all reprisals. I contend you are not a good ambassador for us. You seem to prioritize personal atracks and bigotry. I just don't like bullies.
are you crying?

i asked you whether you thought another member, who was just banned and is a nazi, had a "valid argument" when he said CHIP "was already funded". and you start crying.

anyhoo, welcome new member.
 

Possum1

Well-Known Member
are you crying?

i asked you whether you thought another member, who was just banned and is a nazi, had a "valid argument" when he said CHIP "was already funded". and you start crying.

anyhoo, welcome new member.
Thank You Old Member!
Don't know anything about this particular person you personally attacked and insulted with what I learned were off limit words, this time.
Just calling them as I see them.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Just calling them as I see them.
you said he had a "valid argument" that CHIP "was already funded" on the very day democrats forced republicans to fund it. that was where you chose to jump in.

anyone who says CHIP "was already funded" on the day democrats forced republicans to fund it is a liar. anyone who defends that lie as a "vaild argument" is arguably in the mental retardation zone.

but hey, i've seen lots of new members jump into politics and complain about personal attacks on recently banned neo-nazis.,
 

Possum1

Well-Known Member
you said he had a "valid argument" that CHIP "was already funded" on the very day democrats forced republicans to fund it. that was where you chose to jump in.

anyone who says CHIP "was already funded" on the day democrats forced republicans to fund it is a liar. anyone who defends that lie as a "vaild argument" is arguably in the mental retardation zone.

but hey, i've seen lots of new members jump into politics and complain about personal attacks on recently banned neo-nazis.,
I did?
 
Top