Do you believe your enemy should suffer?

Do you believe your enemy should suffer?

  • Yes

  • No

Results are only viewable after voting.
New Age United

New Age United

Well-Known Member
I try my best to transcend ego in all human interaction and avoid enemy making, easier said than done a guy just messaged me on fb complaining about my mother doing her job which is animal control in our town. My mother already asked me about him saying he's being aggressive and intimidating I told I would smack the shit out of him if continues. And I will. Yes when I have an enemy I wish suffering on them, I guess that would make me somewhat sadistic but I think that capacity is in all of us, it is human nature, enemy makes others more other than ourselves and in turn strengthens our sence of self, it is embedded in our egos.
 
Dalek Supreme

Dalek Supreme

Well-Known Member
I would just want their seed to end.

I recently found out a meathead that screwed me over big time some years back had fatally od'ed. My main concern was that he did not reproduce, and thankfully he did not.
 
mauricem00

mauricem00

Well-Known Member
I trust karma to take care of them unless they pose an emanate threat to me or someone I care about.beyond self defense I have no right to judge another person. everything happens for a reason but it make take years to understand that reason
 
Nugachino

Nugachino

Well-Known Member
Most of my enemies have drank or smoked themselves into poor health anyway. So they're already suffering. One even fell off the perch a decade ago.

The rest of them... Well let's just say I hope they spend the rest of their days being fed cockmeat sandies. Whether they want it or not.
 
vostok

vostok

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
If your enemy is caught, do you believe they should suffer in their consequences? Why/why not?
Click to expand...
con•se•quence
(ˈkɒn sɪˌkwɛns, -kwəns) n
.1. the effect, result, or outcome of something occurring earlier.
2. the conclusion reached by a line of reasoning; inference.
3. importance or significance: a matter of no consequence.
4. importance in rank or position; distinction: a man of consequence.
Idioms:
in consequence, consequently; as a result.
(http://www.thefreedictionary.com/consequence)

if he is my enemy as a consequence of his actions

1: He fired a gun at me ...and missed

2: as a consequence I returned fire

3: I killed or wounded him as a consequence of my actions

4: I feel that the consequences of this will result in further action by him or others

5: then the suffering he will endure, as a result of my actions will be seen as a clear message, to any further action on their part

(eye for an eye)
 
too larry

too larry

Well-Known Member
No I would not want them to suffer. I had a friend who ripped me off once. I spent over a ear trying to come up with a safe way to kill him and not get caught. In the end, I never could come up with a good plan, so I let it go. I had wasted a year of my life. Lots of sleepless night, lots of stress and worry during that year. These days I go years without thinking of him.
 
mr sunshine

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
too larry said:
No I would not want them to suffer. I had a friend who ripped me off once. I spent over a ear trying to come up with a safe way to kill him and not get caught. In the end, I never could come up with a good plan, so I let it go. I had wasted a year of my life. Lots of sleepless night, lots of stress and worry during that year. These days I go years without thinking of him.
Click to expand...
Should of talked to me, I have bad ass plan's. Some of the best plans around, I shit you not.
 
Padawanbater2

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
vostok said:
con•se•quence
(ˈkɒn sɪˌkwɛns, -kwəns) n
.1. the effect, result, or outcome of something occurring earlier.
2. the conclusion reached by a line of reasoning; inference.
3. importance or significance: a matter of no consequence.
4. importance in rank or position; distinction: a man of consequence.
Idioms:
in consequence, consequently; as a result.
(http://www.thefreedictionary.com/consequence)

if he is my enemy as a consequence of his actions

1: He fired a gun at me ...and missed

2: as a consequence I returned fire

3: I killed or wounded him as a consequence of my actions

4: I feel that the consequences of this will result in further action by him or others

5: then the suffering he will endure, as a result of my actions will be seen as a clear message, to any further action on their part

(eye for an eye)
Click to expand...
I guess maybe a better question would be; "Do you think your worst enemies, the worst people society produces, the Adolph Hitlers, and Ted Bundy's, those types of people. Do you think those types of people should "suffer" for what they've done?

What I'm essentially trying to understand is why someone who supports putting people who have been found guilty of committing horrible crimes against innocent people through extreme torture/torment and how they believe it's justifiable

Does causing them extreme amounts of pain and anguish before they're eventually executed serve any other actual purpose but to make the people executing them feel better for having tortured them beforehand? If it does, and that's only why we do it, what does that say about us as a species? Why torture someone before we kill them? Is that for society, or is that for us..?
 
vostok

vostok

Well-Known Member
not at all

I'm very surprised Saddam Hussian was handed over to his enemies

that alone was a war crime ...imo

but Colombian neckties do make your enemies rethink

I often choke myself with shame as we are a global village

as Ghandi said

you can't greet a friend with a closed fist
 
Last edited:
mr sunshine

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
Padawanbater2 said:
I guess maybe a better question would be; "Do you think your worst enemies, the worst people society produces, the Adolph Hitlers, and Ted Bundy's, those types of people. Do you think those types of people should "suffer" for what they've done?

What I'm essentially trying to understand is why someone who supports putting people who have been found guilty of committing horrible crimes against innocent people through extreme torture/torment and how they believe it's justifiable

Does causing them extreme amounts of pain and anguish before they're eventually executed serve any other actual purpose but to make the people executing them feel better for having tortured them beforehand? If it does, and that's only why we do it, what does that say about us as a species? Why torture someone before we kill them? Is that for society, or is that for us..?
Click to expand...
Who gets tortured? Seems like that mostly happens when someone doesn't want to cough up information or so something. For the most part, lethal injection seems pretty chill.
 
too larry

too larry

Well-Known Member
mr sunshine said:
Should of talked to me, I have bad ass plan's. Some of the best plans around, I shit you not.
Click to expand...
I was riding a rice burner back them. My only gun at the time was an old pump .22 rifle. He lived in a trailer park full of welfare mothers. I did turn it all around, but never came up with a fool proof way to off him and not get caught. Glad I didn't now. That was 30 years ago. He has faded out of my life, and that's fine with me.
 
mr sunshine

mr sunshine

Well-Known Member
too larry said:
I was riding a rice burner back them. My only gun at the time was an old pump .22 rifle. He lived in a trailer park full of welfare mothers. I did turn it all around, but never came up with a fool proof way to off him and not get caught. Glad I didn't now. That was 30 years ago. He has faded out of my life, and that's fine with me.
Click to expand...
Guns is not part of my plan, you forgive him then get Fucked up with him and have sex. Then you inject air into his veins.. He has a heart attack, you call 911, talk to the cops, then you go home. Or how about treating him to an aids infested pussy?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top