Would you support a bill that required the consent of the father to obtain an abortion?

Would you support a bill that required the consent of the father to obtain an abortion?


  • Total voters
    28

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
I guess it's a good thing that women have never done anything irresponsible simply because they were horny. (yep, that's sarcasm)
Why do they get to decide whether or not they want to be a mommy -- AND whether or not someone else becomes a daddy, and is forced to pay for HER decision to be a mommy? (nope, that's *not* sarcasm)
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
wow.

you've gone from thinking that 11 year olds can consent, to now thinking that fetuses can consent.

I don't think a fetus can consent, which is precisely why I think killing one would be problematic for me.

It sort of reminds me of trying to come up with a justification for "collateral damage". I don't know that I can.

Odd, that on one hand you believe an eleven year old who is incapable of consenting should be protected, but you don't feel the same way about another being that is much younger, (a fetus) is deserving of any protection.

Isn't that a contradiction?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
That man should have wore a condom kids are expensive and it's a full time job raising a child until they go to school.

Condoms are not 100% effective.

I don't think anybody should be forced to carry a pregnancy if they don't want to, but the question is, is there a corollary right to that for a man ? If a man shouldn't force a woman to carry a pregnancy thru to birth, should a woman be able to force a man to pay for a child he didn't plan for?
 

Rob Roy

Well-Known Member
no, that's the job of the court.

pedo.

So, you would allow a woman to extinguish / kill another being, because it's "hers", but then insist a man pay for it, if it escapes abortion...since it is "his" ?

Does that seem equitable to you ?
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
You're using a rhetorical question as the basis for your point. Fact is, men have no say and never will. Men have their say before they stick their dick in. If pregnancy occurs, and the woman doesn't want the kid, the fetus dies. That will not, nor should it, change. Men have a chance to have their say, before pregnancy occurs. After that, it's up to the woman. So, again, what is there to discuss?

This has been distasteful for me, as in MY world, no one would get pregnant until the world's total population is less than three billion people. If men want a say in having kids, men need to figure out a way to carry pregnancies to term. Until then, men have no say. Men should NEVER have say, because men are impulsive and stupid. I include myself in that description, but at least I wasn't stupid enough to become a parent. Kids born today will be lucky to reach 40 and die. Humanity has about 40 years left. Anyone bearing children is giving birth to the LAST generation of humans, because climate change will kill the species in about 30-40 years. So, in the long run, your question doesn't mean shit, anyway.

You want more babies born. I don't want any born. Humanity needs a vast die off, if it has any chance to survive more than about 40 years. Since that's not going to happen, humans will be here for another 30-40 years, and then all the rich people will discover they can't eat money.

tl:dr Bite me.
Men have their say before they stick their pecker in. Ok. So I agree, along with a woman, to have a kid and you think that's it. She can agree to have a kid then change her mind and leave the man hanging?

Its complicated for sure.

As evident you have a hard time with complicated subjects.

You go on to say I want people to have kids. You call having kids stupid. You say this is the last generation.

You call men impulsive and stupid. That's bull. I'm a rock and in complete control of my life.

Man someone must have really done a number on you.

You connect dots that are not even there.

You then say too long didn't read. It was literally 4 sentences. Lol.
 

CaliSmokes

Well-Known Member
I would like a say.

Scenario:

ConDOM malfunctions, she leaves city, finds out she's pregnant, and doesn't inform guy. Gets abortion. Doesn't seem right. I would have wanted to know
 

Fender Super

Well-Known Member
FYI
My sister got screwed over by a dipshit who never paid child support...
Why did she allow herself to become pregnant? Why didn't she have an abortion? Women bear the same responsibility for preventing pregnancy as men do. It's a two-way street. But if a man doesn't want to get financially screwed, his next move should be to make an appointment with a urologist and schedule a vasectomy. It's not even a surgical procedure like it was with me.

Sounds to me like your sister was negligent, unprepared and above all, stupid. Women do stupid crap, too; saving condoms, not swallowing and using said jizz to impregnate themselves (turkey basters, anyone?), etc. But the MAN has control over all of this.

Do not spoo in her mouth. Use a condom and don't let her ever touch it with her hands. Flush it and wash your manhood with plenty of soap. Do you WANT to be a babydaddy? If not, be judicious and prepared. If it cuts into the amorata, well WAAAA. But if you don't take steps, any financial repercussions are your own fault for not keeping your wick dry.

I was lucky, paid for one abortion (and I'm NOT sorry) and dodged the bullet. My two marriages broke up because I simply would not relent on the "no kids" statement I made during pre-marital counseling. BOTH TIMES!!! But when my first said she'd changed her mind, I slept on the couch till a put together enough money to move. But I never touched her again. I was serious about controlling my reproductive destiny and made SURE whomever I boned (so sad those days are over) would not become pregnant.

THAT, sir, is taking control of your own reproductive destiny. If you're forced to pay child support, it's on you for being stupid. If you grow up and stop thinking with the little head, maybe you'll begin to get it but you're young, stupid and impulsive.

Have a nice life, dad!
 
Last edited:

Fender Super

Well-Known Member
I guess it's a good thing that women have never done anything irresponsible simply because they were horny. (yep, that's sarcasm)
Why do they get to decide whether or not they want to be a mommy -- AND whether or not someone else becomes a daddy, and is forced to pay for HER decision to be a mommy? (nope, that's *not* sarcasm)
Man has control until the moment of conception. Just has to think. I did, why can't you?
 

Fender Super

Well-Known Member
I would like a say.

Scenario:

ConDOM malfunctions, she leaves city, finds out she's pregnant, and doesn't inform guy. Gets abortion. Doesn't seem right. I would have wanted to know
Not your choice. You only get to know if she wants you to. If she doesn't want the kid, you have nothing to say about it, no legal standing.
 
Last edited:

Fender Super

Well-Known Member
Condoms are not 100% effective.

I don't think anybody should be forced to carry a pregnancy if they don't want to, but the question is, is there a corollary right to that for a man ? If a man shouldn't force a woman to carry a pregnancy thru to birth, should a woman be able to force a man to pay for a child he didn't plan for?
Yes. Don't be stupid and you WON'T HAVE TO PAY!!!
 

whitebb2727

Well-Known Member
Oh for fuck's sake, I'm not saying that at all. Were you born with reading comprehension this bad, or did you have to take a class?

I AM saying men have control over where their jizz goes and what it does. If you are a man and you do not want accidental children, you will take control of your reproductive destiny, stop thinking with the little head and avoid unwanted pregnancy, with that as your top of mind, PRIOR to any romantic behavior. Oh gee, it might give you a sad to actually think before you fuck. Tough titties. You don't want children? Or you don't want them NOW, jack it a few times, freeze the jizz, get a vasectomy and when you WANT to have kids, call the bank and make some withdrawals. But just leaving it to chance is an act of a very stupid person.

You sound like you want to be a bee, flitting from flower to flower, impregnating everything in your path. I have a word for people like that...assholes.
You are the one with reading comprehension problems. Nowhere in this thread are we talking about unwanted children. Quite the opposite. We are talking about men wanting a child and the mother doesn't.

Kind of the reason for the title of the thread. Why would a man that didn't want a child give a fuck if the woman had an abortion.

Look man, take the time to read this thread again and pay attention.

I doubt you will because you literally said that four sentences was too long and didn't read it. Then act like you know what we are talking about.:wall:
 

Fender Super

Well-Known Member
LOL! i like the way you think, you seem pretty damn smart. Too bad most people are too fucking stupid to understand this simple reality.
Thanks. Not very smart but I've lived a lot. Those who have not, will disagree with me but the people who get it, and their numbers are very small, will understand. American men sure are stupid.
 

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
Um, who's got the comprehension problem? the tl;dr was a courtesy for others who didn't want to read the post. I wrote the fucking post and proofed it, the tl;dr was for others. Get one of your 17 kids to increase the voltage on your Variac. Idiot. Asshole.
LOL!
:dunce: :cuss::dunce:
I hope you're high as fuck, cause that's the only excuse I will accept for your stupid comments.
Think it over Junior, then get back to us. :eyesmoke:
 

Chunky Stool

Well-Known Member
What is illogical about what I wrote? Spell it out. You don't get to make a statement like that and not back it up, Private Pyle.
Attempting to debate anything with you is mental masturbation -- without the happy ending. :-(
You represent stupidity in its purest form, and I pity you. :dunce: :?
 
Top