londonfog
Well-Known Member
cite
"If you do not believe in climate change, you should not be allowed to hold public office"
- Thread starter Padawanbater2
- Start date
Justin-case
Well-Known Member
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
http://climatechangereconsidered.org/
http://climatechangereconsidered.org/nipcc-scientists/
About the NIPCC
The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) is an international panel of nongovernment scientists and scholars who have come together to present a comprehensive, authoritative, and realistic assessment of the science and economics of global warming. Because it is not a government agency, and because its members are not predisposed to believe climate change is caused by human greenhouse gas emissions, NIPCC is able to offer an independent “second opinion” of the evidence reviewed – or not reviewed – by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the issue of global warming.http://climatechangereconsidered.org/nipcc-scientists/
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
say, isn't the NIPCC an arm of the heartland institute, which led the fight several decades ago to convince morons like you that cigarettes don't cause cancer?
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
Climate change denial pays better than being a climate scientist.
Same people are now going after laws that treat e-cigarettes in the same manner as cigarettes.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
You mean morons that still smoke cigarettes, like yourself chief?
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
That would be the FDA leading the charge against the largely free, unregulated vape market with such pseudo science as measuring the plastic smoke from a vape that had the safety turned off with a vaccum hooked to it and citing this measurement as unsafe.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
i am fully aware of the negative health consequences of my habit, because i do not buy into the retarded propaganda for idiots that you cited.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
Yes, standing up for a bar owners right to service smokers while smoking in their establishment is propaganda as is the fact that moderate smoking has proven to have little to no adverse health effects.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
you are literally retarded.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Awww come on, I was waiting for him to explain what 'moderate smoking' meant.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
londonfog
Well-Known Member
Fogdog
Well-Known Member
The presumptive moron in chief is confused about climate change.
Donald Trump: ‘Nobody Really Knows’ If Climate Change Is Real (It Is)
The president-elect says he’s “studying” the Paris agreement.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/if-you-do-not-believe-in-climate-change-you-should-not-be-allowed-to-hold-public-office.922825/page-32#post-13183807
The president-elect says he’s “studying” the Paris agreement.
He's going to study up, just like he studied for the debates.
Donald Trump: ‘Nobody Really Knows’ If Climate Change Is Real (It Is)
The president-elect says he’s “studying” the Paris agreement.
https://www.rollitup.org/t/if-you-do-not-believe-in-climate-change-you-should-not-be-allowed-to-hold-public-office.922825/page-32#post-13183807
The president-elect says he’s “studying” the Paris agreement.
He's going to study up, just like he studied for the debates.
twostrokenut
Well-Known Member
So what's to be confused about? There's one side who believes their hockey stick graph is correct, and has been funding and releasing the regulation hounds accordingly. This side says lack of regulation has caused climate change. This sides crux argument is that man made co2 emissions will influence climate and that the expense of regulation is cheeper than errrrrrfff.
The middle ground is the fact that humans have contributed to atmospheric co2.
The other side, requires no regulation and says more co2 is a good thing for food production and overall human in habitation of Earth and that,
2000 years ago the roman warm period was hotter than today,
the dark ages were cooler,
medieval times were as warm as today,
the little ice age was next, drove the vikings out of greenland,
then a gradual 300 year warming to the present day,
during the past 400000 years there have been 4 major periods of glaciation, interrupted by brief inter-glacial periods.
we currently are in the Pleistocene ice age which began 2.5 million years ago,
30 million years ago the earth had no ice on it at all
and the current warming trend began a century before fossil fuel related co2.
"I have an impact on the weather" is an elitist position, devoid of evidence. So given that, there seems to be a lot of folks here who are cool with elitists holding office and now making it a prerequisite.
The middle ground is the fact that humans have contributed to atmospheric co2.
The other side, requires no regulation and says more co2 is a good thing for food production and overall human in habitation of Earth and that,
2000 years ago the roman warm period was hotter than today,
the dark ages were cooler,
medieval times were as warm as today,
the little ice age was next, drove the vikings out of greenland,
then a gradual 300 year warming to the present day,
during the past 400000 years there have been 4 major periods of glaciation, interrupted by brief inter-glacial periods.
we currently are in the Pleistocene ice age which began 2.5 million years ago,
30 million years ago the earth had no ice on it at all
and the current warming trend began a century before fossil fuel related co2.
"I have an impact on the weather" is an elitist position, devoid of evidence. So given that, there seems to be a lot of folks here who are cool with elitists holding office and now making it a prerequisite.
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Hell just come out with a pronouncement like, 'it's not real!' and that'll be the end of it.
UncleBuck
Well-Known Member
in case anyone is wondering, "elitist" here means "jew".
doublejj
Well-Known Member
the trumpster is on a witch hunt at the DOEnergy....his transition team has asked for a list of names of DOE scientists that have attended & contributed to global warming conferences......
DOE has responded & said they would not provide such a list....the war has started & he's not even in office yet...
DOE has responded & said they would not provide such a list....the war has started & he's not even in office yet...
ttystikk
Well-Known Member
Don't try shoving that in MY mouth, pal- I've met plenty of elitists who aren't Jewish. In fact, almost all the elitists I've met weren't. Many weren't rich, either lol They were just patrician asshole wannabes who think anyone without 7, preferably 8 figures to the left of the decimal in their personal account wasn't worth talking to.
I've actually told a few of them that the only thing all their money couldn't buy them was an ounce of class.
Most of my wealthy Jewish friends are in fact quite the opposite, and hate elitists as much as I do.