Can a 3-year old represent herself in immigration court? This judge thinks so.

[bearkat42]

A senior Justice Department official is arguing that 3- and 4-year-olds can learn immigration law well enough to represent themselves in court, staking out an unconventional position in a growing debate over whether immigrant children facing deportation are entitled to taxpayer-funded attorneys.

Jack H. Weil, a longtime immigration judge who is responsible for training other judges, made the assertion in sworn testimony in a deposition in federal court in Seattle. His comments highlighted the plight of thousands of juveniles who are forced to defend themselves each year in immigration court amid a surge of children from Central America who cross the southwestern U.S. border .

“I’ve taught immigration law literally to 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds,” Weil said. “It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of patience. They get it. It’s not the most efficient, but it can be done.”
He repeated his claim twice in the deposition, also saying, “I’ve told you I have trained 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds in immigration law,” according to a transcript. “You can do a fair hearing. It’s going to take you a lot of time.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/can-a-3-year-old-represent-herself-in-immigration-court-this-judge-thinks-so/2016/03/03/5be59a32-db25-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html

 

[ttystikk]

A senior Justice Department official is arguing that 3- and 4-year-olds can learn immigration law well enough to represent themselves in court, staking out an unconventional position in a growing debate over whether immigrant children facing deportation are entitled to taxpayer-funded attorneys.

Jack H. Weil, a longtime immigration judge who is responsible for training other judges, made the assertion in sworn testimony in a deposition in federal court in Seattle. His comments highlighted the plight of thousands of juveniles who are forced to defend themselves each year in immigration court amid a surge of children from Central America who cross the southwestern U.S. border .

“I’ve taught immigration law literally to 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds,” Weil said. “It takes a lot of time. It takes a lot of patience. They get it. It’s not the most efficient, but it can be done.”
He repeated his claim twice in the deposition, also saying, “I’ve told you I have trained 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds in immigration law,” according to a transcript. “You can do a fair hearing. It’s going to take you a lot of time.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/can-a-3-year-old-represent-herself-in-immigration-court-this-judge-thinks-so/2016/03/03/5be59a32-db25-11e5-925f-1d10062cc82d_story.html

Unmotherfuckingbelievable.

Let's strip this worthless fuck bare ass naked in a foreign country where he doesn't speak the lingo and see how HE does. I bet he changes his tune.

Can we implement an immigration program where we deport racist rednecks on a one for one basis to allow children to immigrate?

I vote we start with Donald the Chump.

 

[brimck325]

i vote we take care of our own BEFORE we take care of others.

 

[ttystikk]

i vote we take care of our own BEFORE we take care of others.

I vote we take up donations to buy a bullet 'to take care of' this immigration judge.

 

[bearkat42]

Unmotherfuckingbelievable.

Let's strip this worthless fuck bare ass naked in a foreign country where he doesn't speak the lingo and see how HE does. I bet he changes his tune.

Can we implement an immigration program where we deport racist rednecks on a one for one basis to allow children to immigrate?

I vote we start with Donald the Chump.

He actually said this under sworn testimony. And this clown's job is to train other immigration judges.

 

[ttystikk]

He actually said this under sworn testimony. And this clown's job is to train other immigration judges.

I think that sworn testimony should be used to have him disbarred.

Sure looks like 'Prima Facie' evidence of incompetence due to excessive bias to me!

 

[bearkat42]

I think that sworn testimony should be used to have him disbarred.

Sure looks like 'Prima Facie' evidence of incompetence due to excessive bias to me!

And of course he claimed that this was taken out of context, without actually providing the context in which this would have made any kind of sense.

 

[ttystikk]

And of course he claimed that this was taken out of context, without actually providing the context in which this would have made any kind of sense.

He repeated himself. Does that mean it was taken out of context TWICE?