Pissed

born2grow

New Member
aah man, thats harsh.....i can relate.....my grow is in the middle of a blowdown (no one with any smarts goes in unless they have a realy good reason) and random deadheads and shit are allways falling from the tops......i've allways had the fear of a tree actualy falling in it :S

the one thing i will consider a lie is a.......9 footer.....first timer.......like chewy said......i'm guna need pic's to believe that. but Tree Vs Marijuana.....tree usualy wins :D
Just for comparison, i currantly have a plant about 9 feet tall myself.

I'm 6'3" and cant reach the top of it....So because i don't post pics on the web i guess i'm a liar also.....besides he already stated the plant was destroyed. So what is a picture going to prove to you...won't be able to tell how tall it was.
 

Woomeister

Well-Known Member
Just for comparison, i currantly have a plant about 9 feet tall myself.

I'm 6'3" and cant reach the top of it....So because i don't post pics on the web i guess i'm a liar also.....besides he already stated the plant was destroyed. So what is a picture going to prove to you...won't be able to tell how tall it was.
Too many people insist on proof with pictures, one guy told me ''you must have a camera, everyone does'' no they dont!
 

fdd2blk

Well-Known Member
i went into my local cannabis club the other day. i have been going there for 4 years so they are like family. i brought in my camera and showed one of the ladies there some pics of my garden. she freaked out. "you put that on a camera?!!!!"
 

Corbat420

Well-Known Member
yea, im just not willing to believe anyone who says they have a 9' on their first grow......W/O pics......its just not likely...... just from the simple fact that the best "first grows" i have seen are average, and lots of them fail (like my first).

haha, FDD can vouch for the work that it takes to get monsters.....he knows what im talking about.

as for everyone having a camera, i dident for most of this year.....but i borrowed one and still got early pics....
 

born2grow

New Member
yea, im just not willing to believe anyone who says they have a 9' on their first grow......W/O pics......its just not likely...... just from the simple fact that the best "first grows" i have seen are average, and lots of them fail (like my first).

haha, FDD can vouch for the work that it takes to get monsters.....he knows what im talking about.

as for everyone having a camera, i dident for most of this year.....but i borrowed one and still got early pics....
If it's planted outdoors in good old mother-nature....anything is possible!
 

Chewwy1234

Well-Known Member
Just for comparison, i currantly have a plant about 9 feet tall myself.

I'm 6'3" and cant reach the top of it....So because i don't post pics on the web i guess i'm a liar also.....besides he already stated the plant was destroyed. So what is a picture going to prove to you...won't be able to tell how tall it was.
I think your lying....I wanna see pics......just kidding :peace:
 

born2grow

New Member
I bought a better camera just to take better pics of my grow.I upgraded from 2 to 8 megapixels :peace:
How much of a differance from 2 to 8.

Is there noticable differance in the quality of the pics...just curious been thinking about getting one myself.
 

Corbat420

Well-Known Member
OOHH yea, theres an awsome quality difference when you get more MP's.....i went from my friends 4MP to my 10MP kodak M1033, and there was an awsome difference.
 

Chewwy1234

Well-Known Member
How much of a differance from 2 to 8.

Is there noticable differance in the quality of the pics...just curious been thinking about getting one myself.
The difference is very noticable its like going from VHS to Blue Ray.I bought mine for under $200 (Canon Power Shot A590 IS)
 
Top