political myths

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Except that here, in the real world, that hasn't happened.
except that it has.





CO2 levels have risen and temperature has stalled for at least 17 years.
no it hasn't, you just suck at reading simple graphs.


Until the hypothesis explains that, and the computer models are fixed to reflect a better understanding of what is really happening and produce accurate predictions, skepticism is in order.
the models do produce accurate predictions though.

you are sitting here denying reality and giving us evangelical economists funded by exxon mobil to back it all up.

you are a fucking joke.

L2science, retard.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
you progs are unaware of the warming hiatus
there is no hiatus, unless we listen to your evangelical economist who works for exxon mobil.




the predicted corrolation between increased CO2 and global warming that has not panned out
yes it has.





The internet has been awash in this info for years. You are all free to practice your religion, however, this is America.

says the idiot who is citing an economist who has taken an evangelical pledge on the issue and works for exxon mobil.


The IPCC draft report acknowledges a "global warming hiatus," according to media reports.
media reports from your evangelical exxon mobil sources?

cite it in the IPCC report itself, princess.
 

overgrowem

Well-Known Member
You don't think I was trying to pass that off as a global measure do you?

Considering I started off my sentence with "locally. "
"locally was your mistake. Using a local antidote to introduce a global subject. How does your hiatus square with wave theory and a positive trend.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
This is funny. The IPCC says it, but it's not true!

Cuz science!

IPCC: Despite hiatus, climate change here to stay

Global warming will be irreversible for centuries, latest report warns.


When a sentence says "despite hiatus, ..." that means there IS an hiatus.

IPCC agrees we are in the midst of an hiatus.

http://www.nature.com/news/ipcc-despite-hiatus-climate-change-here-to-stay-1.13832

Why anybody would deny that the IPCC agrees there is an hiatus is beyond me, it just makes them look like fools. We can all read.
 

callitgood

Member
there is no hiatus, unless we listen to your evangelical economist who works for exxon mobil.






yes it has.








says the idiot who is citing an economist who has taken an evangelical pledge on the issue and works for exxon mobil.




media reports from your evangelical exxon mobil sources?

cite it in the IPCC report itself, princess.
From wikipedia:

Hans von Storch
In January 2011, Storch was counted among the 100 most influential Germans by the Focus magazine for being a "climate realist".[6]

On 20 June 2013 Storch stated "So far, no one has been able to provide a compelling answer to why climate change seems to be taking a break. We're facing a puzzle. Recent CO2 emissions have actually risen even more steeply than we feared. As a result, according to most climate models, we should have seen temperatures rise by around 0.25 degrees Celsius (0.45 degrees Fahrenheit) over the past 10 years. That hasn't happened. In fact, the increase over the last 15 years was just 0.06 degrees Celsius (0.11 degrees Fahrenheit) -- a value very close to zero. This is a serious scientific problem that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) will have to confront when it presents its next Assessment Report late next year."[7]
 

Padawanbater2

Well-Known Member
IPCC: Despite hiatus, climate change here to stay

Global warming will be irreversible for centuries, latest report warns.


When a sentence says "despite hiatus, ..." that means there IS an hiatus.

IPCC agrees we are in the midst of an hiatus.

http://www.nature.com/news/ipcc-despite-hiatus-climate-change-here-to-stay-1.13832

Why anybody would deny that the IPCC agrees there is an hiatus is beyond me, it just makes them look like fools. We can all read.
You don't accept the IPPC's overall findings, you don't get to cherry pick from it

If you do, you're tacitly agreeing with its findings

That's how it works
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
IPCC: Despite hiatus, climate change here to stay

Global warming will be irreversible for centuries, latest report warns.


When a sentence says "despite hiatus, ..." that means there IS an hiatus.

IPCC agrees we are in the midst of an hiatus.

http://www.nature.com/news/ipcc-despite-hiatus-climate-change-here-to-stay-1.13832

Why anybody would deny that the IPCC agrees there is an hiatus is beyond me, it just makes them look like fools. We can all read.
that's a media report, not the IPCC report. you fucking stooge.
 

desert dude

Well-Known Member
You don't accept the IPPC's overall findings, you don't get to cherry pick from it

If you do, you're tacitly agreeing with its findings

That's how it works
Bater, we are talking about climate, weather, heat, science, etc. When the discussion turns to coerced sex and auto-asphyxiation accompanied orgasms I will defer to your superior knowledge.
 

UncleBuck

Well-Known Member
Bater, we are talking about climate, weather, heat, science, etc. When the discussion turns to coerced sex and auto-asphyxiation accompanied orgasms I will defer to your superior knowledge.
he has you dead to rights.

you can't choose what part of the IPCC report you want to believe or not believe. either their findings are valid or they are not. the same scientific method and peer review backs all their findings.

sadly for you, the "hiatus" you claim is in there is not. go to their latest report, hit ctrl+F, and search for it yourself.

you are so stupid you can't even tell the difference between a media report and the IPCC's actual findings.

got any more evangelical economists paid by exxon mobil to tout?
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
except that it has.







no it hasn't, you just suck at reading simple graphs.




the models do produce accurate predictions though.

you are sitting here denying reality and giving us evangelical economists funded by exxon mobil to back it all up.

you are a fucking joke.

L2science, retard.
Your Own graph shows no real temperature increase since the late 90's at the latest.

The line of best fit keeps going up in spite of the data because of the hand picked starting date and the increase from then until the 90's.
 

SmokeyDan

Well-Known Member
"locally was your mistake. Using a local antidote to introduce a global subject. How does your hiatus square with wave theory and a positive trend.
I'm not sure how local it truly is.

I'm a weather nerd and the entire southeastern US had a mild Summer.

The trend is actually flattened.

I do know you have to misrepresent the data to make the warming we have had look impressive.

A couple of degrees Increase is supposed to impress me? And we had a mini ice age 2 centuries ago.
 

Harrekin

Well-Known Member
More myths:

•9/11 was committed by Muslim terrorists

•Bashar Al-Assad attacked his own people with banned weapons whilst everybody in the entire world was watching Syria at the time

•Israel is an innocent party in the continued Hamas rocket attacks

•Obama was born in Hawaii
 
Top