Greenpeace Founder: Climate Change Is Bogus

[NLXSK1]

more than 50% of america's paper pulp comes from recycled paper, the rest comes from pulpwood farms, and sawmill waste.

old growth wood is far more valuable as timber, and export hardwood. nobody cuts down old growth trees for paper pulp.

facts is facts. even a wikipedia warrior like yourself can look that shit up.

The idiot thinks they cut down shit trees and ship them all the way to America for pulp... LOL!!!! They grow millions of acres of shit trees here in America for paper pulp, no reason to import the shit.

 

[jahbrudda]

What happened to the days of making your kids go to school even if it snowed 40 inches and was 30 below zero out?

They're entitled now.

 

[twostrokenut]

bro, if there were such berries i would be eating some right now.

I think man made climate change is the result of eating dingle berries, not technically fully plant material. I would advise against eating them, they make you see red for no good reason at all.

 

[twostrokenut]

View attachment 3012290

Damn. I just went to lens crafters. Is my Rx off? That makes me derp.

Grow a beard!!!
Beard!!

 

[Padawanbater2]

They're entitled now.

You're entitled.

 

[NLXSK1]

You're entitled.

When it degenerates into this you know you have won the debate with a liberal... LOL!

 

[twostrokenut]

The idiot thinks they cut down shit trees and ship them all the way to America for pulp... LOL!!!! They grow millions of acres of shit trees here in America for paper pulp, no reason to import the shit.

It was an attempt to emphasize importance on the rain forest and climate change I reckon.
Does anyone else Boreal Forest much?

 

[jahbrudda]

When it degenerates into this you know you have won the debate with a liberal... LOL!

He and Buck had a tough one yesterday, their AGW consensus got shoved up their butts, so they're pissed off cause they were wrong.

 

[Pinworm]

Grow a beard!!!
Beard!!

[video=youtube;XPak7z9lzRg]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPak7z9lzRg[/video]

 

[NLXSK1]

It was an attempt to emphasize importance on the rain forest and climate change I reckon.
Does anyone else Boreal Forest much?

It sucks what other countries are doing to their own land but it falls under sovereignty... As a people we need to stop trying to control each other so much...

 

[Pinworm]

It sucks what other countries are doing to their own land but it falls under sovereignty... As a people we need to stop trying to control each other so much...

Agreed. I just wish people would look at this board thusly....

[video=youtube;q0kSuZFOwFE]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0kSuZFOwFE[/video]

We should all just grow some beards.

 

[twostrokenut]

It sucks what other countries are doing to their own land but it falls under sovereignty... As a people we need to stop trying to control each other so much...

I send my support dollars for sure:

 

[UncleBuck]

66.4% of the researchers ... did not feel confident to link human activity with a small short term rise in temps.

*not intended to be a factual statement.

 

[UncleBuck]

66% of Scientists do not believe Climate Change is man made....

*not intended to be a factual statement.

 

[UncleBuck]

>67% do NOT support AGW

*not intended to be a factual statement.

 

[UncleBuck]

You might be interested in:

The period of "Global Cooling" [we are now in, is almost as long as the last "Global Warming" period...

http://blog.heartland.org/2014/03/the-period-of-no-global-warming-will-soon-be-longer-than-the-period-of-actual-global-warming/

the heartland institute?

are you even aware that they are paid by exxonmobil to come to the conclusions that they want?

a few years back they were getting paid by tobacco companies to say that smoking isn't harmful.

good job, sport.

 

[UncleBuck]

MOST of the scientists from the source GodHere provided are undecided.

false.

only a small percentage says they are uncertain as to the cause.

about 66% don't endorse, deny, or express uncertainty.

taking no stance is not the same as being undecided.

being part of a right wing circle jerk does not change the meaning of words.

 

[UncleBuck]

I love it that their own "empirical evidence" came to bit them in the ass

you can believe what you want, doesn't make it true.

that's the great thing about facts, they don't care what morons like you think of them. because they are facts.

This is an excellent article, but the Heartland Institute is attacked repeatedly by the alarmists in the media and here(marching orders)

you are saying the group that said smoking isn't harmful (because tobacco companies paid them to say so) is a good source of information?

you are only exposing your bias and stupidity now.

 

[UncleBuck]

66.4 took a stance saying the science isn't settled.

*not intended to be a factual statement

 

[UncleBuck]

The idiot thinks they cut down shit trees and ship them all the way to America for pulp... LOL!!!!

if you can provide a quote from me where i actually make that claim, i will leave this site forever.

have another lie, ANALLY.